503
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Can China’s leading officials’ accountability audit of natural resources policy promote corporate emissions reduction?

, &
Article: 2317282 | Received 23 May 2023, Accepted 05 Feb 2024, Published online: 16 Feb 2024

References

  • Liu Y, Zhou Y, Wu W. Assessing the impact of population, income and technology on energy consumption and industrial pollutant emissions in China. Appl Energy. 2015;155:904–917. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.051.
  • Lee KH, Min B. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod. 2015;108:534–542. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114.
  • Boiral O. Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth? Organ Sci. 2007;18(1):127–146. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0224.
  • Li H, Zhou LA. Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. J Public Econ. 2005;89(9–10):1743–1762. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009.
  • Fredriksson PG, List JA, Millimet DL. Bureaucratic corruption, environmental policy and inbound US FDI: theory and evidence. J Public Econ. 2003;87(7–8):1407–1430. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00016-6.
  • Hu K, Shi D. The impact of government-enterprise collusion on environmental pollution in China. J Environ Manage. 2021;292:112744. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112744.
  • Zheng S, Kahn ME, Sun W, et al. Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: the role of the Central government and public environmentalism. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 2014;47:61–71. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.09.003.
  • Li J, Shi X, Wu H, et al. Trade-off between economic development and environmental governance in China: an analysis based on the effect of river chief system. China Econ Rev. 2020;60:101403. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101403.
  • Ghanem D, Zhang J. ‘Effortless perfection:’ do Chinese cities manipulate air pollution data? J Environ Econ Manage. 2014;68(2):203–225. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.05.003.
  • Wu X, Cao Q, Tan X, et al. The effect of audit of outgoing leading officials’ natural resource accountability on environmental governance: evidence from China. Managerial Auditing J. 2020;35(9):1213–1241. doi:10.1108/MAJ-08-2019-2378.
  • Cao H, Zhang L, Qi Y, et al. Government auditing and environmental governance: evidence from China’s auditing system reform. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2022;93:106705. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106705.
  • Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Hu H, et al. Accountability audit of natural resource, government environmental regulation and pollution abatement: an empirical study based on difference-in-differences model. J Clean Prod. 2023;410:137205. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137205.
  • Feng Y, Wang X, Hu S. Accountability audit of natural resource, air pollution reduction and political promotion in China: empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. J Cleaner Prod. 2021;287:125002. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125002.
  • Ma X, Shahbaz M, Song M. Off-office audit of natural resource assets and water pollution: a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Enterp Inf Manage. 2021. [cited 2023 May 18]:[26 p.]. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2020-0366.
  • Liu Q, Yu L, Yan G, et al. External governance pressure and corporate environmental responsibility: evidence from a quasi‐natural experiment in China. Business Ethics Environ Responsibility. 2023;32(1):74–93. doi:10.1111/beer.12492.
  • Wang M. Can environmental regulations change the environmental behaviour of local leaders and enterprises? Evidence using the accountability audit of natural resources in China. Local Gov Stud. 2023. [cited 2023 May 18]:[23 p.]. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2023.2206652.
  • Huang R. Auditing the environmental accountability of local officials and the corporate green response: evidence from China. Appl Econ. 2022;55(34):3950–3970. doi:10.1080/00036846.2022.2120958.
  • Wei H, Du L. Official environmental accountability policy and firm’s environmental violations: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023. [cited 2023 Oct 1]:[16 p.]. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03479-4.
  • Jiang C, Liu R, Han J. Does accountability audit of natural resources promote green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023. [cited 2023 May 18]:[26 p.]. doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03114-2.
  • Liu Y, She Y, Liu S, et al. Can the leading officials’ accountability audit of natural resources policy stimulate Chinese heavy-polluting enterprises’ green behavior? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29(31):47772–47799. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18527-1.
  • Zeng H, Li X, Zhou Q, et al. Local government environmental regulatory pressures and corporate environmental strategies: evidence from natural resource accountability audits in China. Bus Strategy Environ. 2022;31(7):3060–3082. doi:10.1002/bse.3064.
  • Liu Y, Ye D, Liu S, et al. The effect of china’s leading officials’ accountability audit of natural resources policy on provincial agricultural carbon intensities: the mediating role of technological progress. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(3):5634–5661. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22465-3.
  • Zhu L, Liu Y, Cai C. Natural resources and assets accountability audit of local officials and government subsidies: evidence from China. Appl Econ Lett. 2023;30(7):981–985. doi:10.1080/13504851.2022.2030854.
  • Laplante B, Rilstone P. Environmental inspections and emissions of the pulp and paper industry in Quebec. J Environ Econ Manage. 1996;31(1):19–36. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0029.
  • Fan H, Peng Y, Wang H, et al. Greening through finance? J Dev Econ. 2021;152:102683. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102683.
  • Zhang Z, Jin X, Yang Q, et al. An empirical study on the institutional factors of energy conservation and emissions reduction: evidence from listed companies in China. Energy Policy. 2013;57:36–42. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.011.
  • Cherniwchan J. Trade liberalization and the environment: evidence from NAFTA and US manufacturing. J Int Econ. 2017;105:130–149. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.01.005.
  • He LY, Wang L. Import liberalization of intermediates and environment: empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing. Sustainability. 2019;11(9):2579. doi:10.3390/su11092579.
  • Tian M, Xu G, Zhang L. Does environmental inspection led by Central government undermine Chinese heavy-polluting firms’ stock value? The buffer role of political connection. J Clean Prod. 2019;236:117695. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117695.
  • Qian W, Burritt R, Monroe G. Environmental management accounting in local government: a case of waste management. Acc Audit Acc. 2011;24(1):93–128. doi:10.1108/09513571111098072.
  • Montesinos V, Brusca I. Towards performance, quality and environmental management in local government: the case of Spain. Local Gov Stud. 2009;35(2):197–212. doi:10.1080/03003930902742971.
  • Aerts W, Cormier D. Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Acc Org Soc. 2009;34(1):1–27. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.005.
  • Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, et al. Necessity as the mother of ‘green’inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Manage J. 2013;34(8):891–909. doi:10.1002/smj.2041.
  • Suchman MC. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage Rev. 1995;20(3):571–610. doi:10.2307/258788.
  • Ramanathan KV. Toward a theory of corporate social accounting. Account Rev. 1976;51(3):516–528.
  • El Ghoul S, Guedhami O, Kim H, et al. Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: international evidence. J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(2):335–361. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-3005-6.
  • Rennings K. Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ. 2000;32(2):319–332. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3.
  • Stadtler L, Lin H. Moving to the next strategy stage: examining firms’ awareness, motivation and capability drivers in environmental alliances. Bus Strategy Environ. 2017;26(6):709–730. doi:10.1002/bse.1937.
  • Loasby BJ, Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. Econ J. 1979;89(356):969–970. doi:10.2307/2231527.
  • Xu C. The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. J Econ Lit. 2011;49(4):1076–1151. doi:10.1257/jel.49.4.1076.
  • Yu D, Hu K, Hao Y. The effect of local government environmental concern on corporate environmental investment: evidence from China. Sustainability. 2023;15(15):11604. doi:10.3390/su151511604.
  • Hadlock CJ, Pierce JR. New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index. Rev Financ Stud. 2010;23(5):1909–1940. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhq009.
  • Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J Financ. 2010;65(5):1637–1667. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x.
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
  • Kang C, Chen Z, Zhang H. The outgoing audit of natural resources assets and enterprise productivity: new evidence from difference-in-differences-in-differences in China. J Environ Manage. 2023;328:116988. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116988.
  • Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, et al. Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Dev Econ. 2016;123:73–85. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.003.
  • Tian Z, Tian Y, Chen Y, et al. The economic consequences of environmental regulation in China: from a perspective of the environmental protection admonishing talk policy. Bus Strategy Environ. 2020;29(4):1723–1733. doi:10.1002/bse.2464.
  • Zhang B, Chen X, Guo H. Does Central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J Public Econ. 2018;164:70–90. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.009.
  • Chen KH, Metcalf RW. The relationship between pollution control record and financial indicators revisited. Account Rev. 1980;55(1):168–177.
  • Jiang L, Lin C, Lin P. The determinants of pollution levels: firm-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing. J Comp Econ. 2014;42(1):118–142. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2013.07.007.
  • Wang H, Mamingi N, Laplante B, et al. Incomplete enforcement of pollution regulation: bargaining power of Chinese factories. Environ Resour Econ. 2003;24(3):245–262. doi:10.1023/A:1022936506398.
  • Kao EH, Fung HG, Li Q. What explains corporate social responsibility engagement in Chinese firms? Chin Econ. 2014;47(5–6):50–80.
  • Bai CE, Xu LC. Incentives for CEOs with multitasks: evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. J Comp Econ. 2005;33(3):517–539. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2005.03.013.
  • Marquis C, Qian C. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: symbol or substance? Organ Sci. 2014;25(1):127–148. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0837.
  • Chen X, Wu J. Do different guanxi types affect capability building differently? A contingency view. Ind Market Manag. 2011;40(4):581–592. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.12.014.
  • Bai SX, Zhang ZZ. Can internal control execution improve corporate environmental investment? Res Financ Econ Iss. 2022;459(02):104–111.
  • Cheng M, Dhaliwal D, Zhang Y. Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting? J Account Econ. 2013;56(1):1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.03.001.
  • Spicer MW. Value pluralism and its implications for American public administration. Admin Theory Prax. 2001;23(4):507–528. doi:10.1080/10841806.2001.11643542.
  • Bozeman B, Sarewitz D. Public value mapping and science policy evaluation. Minerva. 2011;49(1):1–23. doi:10.1007/s11024-011-9161-7.
  • Lehmann N. Do corporate governance analysts matter? Evidence from the expansion of governance analyst coverage. J Accounting Res. 2019;57(3):721–761. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.12254.
  • Dyck A, Volchkova N, Zingales L. The corporate governance role of the media: evidence from russia. J Financ. 2008;63(3):1093–1135. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01353.x.
  • Han S, Pan Y, Mygrant M, et al. Differentiated environmental regulations and corporate environmental responsibility: the moderating role of institutional environment. J Clean Prod. 2021;313:127870. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127870.