Effect of coal particle density on combustion kinetics of Indian coal

References

• Agacayak, T. 2023. Investigation of co-combustion characteristics of olive bagasse, coal and their respective blends by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 43 (1):13–26. doi:10.1080/19392699.2022.2061473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzoom, S. J., Y. Deo, F. Sekh, S. K. Tripathy, and M. Kumar. 2022. Flotation behavior of metallurgical coals from different seams under electrolytic process water. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 42 (11):3380–98. doi:10.1080/19392699.2021.1962313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, D., B. K. Nandi, and S. Bhattacharya. 2018. Chemical properties and combustion behavior of constituent relative density fraction of a thermal coal. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 41 (6):654–64. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1520348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, D., B. K. Nandi, and S. Bhattacharya. 2020. Variations in combustion properties of coal with average relative density and functional groups identified by FTIR analysis. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 42 (6):1695–711. doi:10.1080/19392699.2020.1755661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duzyol, S., and C. Sensogut. 2018. Investigation of the thermal improvement and the kinetic analysis of the enriched coal. Journal of Combustion 2018:1–10. doi:10.1155/2018/1761023.
   Google Scholar
• García, R., C. Pizarro, A. Álvarez, A. G. Lavín, and J. L. Bueno. 2015. Study of biomass combustion biomass combustion wastes. Fuel 148:152–59. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, O. P. 2000. Elements of fuels, furnaces and refractories. 5th. New Delhi, India: Khanna publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, A. A., and Y. Akbulut. 2022. Interpretation of combustion properties of raw-pyrolyzed lignite with kinetic data. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization. doi:10.1080/19392699.2022.2104266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koukouzas, N., C. R. Ward, D. Papanikolaou, Z. Li, and C. Ketikidis. 2009. Quantitative evaluation of minerals in fly ashes of biomass, coal and biomass–coal mixture derived from circulating fluidised bed combustion technology. Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (1–3):100–07. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., and B. K. Nandi. 2021a. Combustion characteristics of high ash Indian coal, wheat straw, wheat husk and their blends. Material Science for Energy Technologies 4:274–81. doi:10.1016/j.mset.2021.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., and B. K. Nandi. 2021b. Effect of rice husk and petroleum coke blending on combustion characteristics of high ash Indian coals. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. doi:10.1007/s13399-021-02090-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., and B. K. Nandi. 2022a. Combustion characteristics of coal, petroleum coke, biomass, and their ternary blends. Journal of Energy Resources and Technology 144 (1):012302. doi:10.1115/1.4052469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., and B. K. Nandi. 2022b. Effects of mustard husk, wheat straw and flaxseed residue blending on combustion behavior of high ash coal and petroleum coke blends. Journal of Energy Resource Technology 144 (9):092101. doi:10.1115/1.4053438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. K., and K. Mohanty. 2020. Kinetic analysis and pyrolysis behaviour of waste biomass towards its bioenergy potential. Bioresource Technology 311:123480. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, R. F. D., M. Kumar, S. L. Singer, C. Zhang, and A. F. Ghoniem. 2009. Reduced order modeling of entrained flow solid fuel gasification. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition: Combustion Science and Engineering. Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA 3:397–409. doi:10.1115/IMECE2009-12985.
   Google Scholar
• Ronsse, F., S. V. Hecke, D. Dickinson, and W. Prins. 2013. Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: Influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. Global Change Biology: Bioenergy 5:104–15. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu, N. K., A. Dewan, and M. Kumar. 2022. Computational investigation on the impact of coal feed size in a tangentially fired gasifier. Combustion Science and Technology. doi:10.1080/00102202.2022.2157210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, M. K., and P. K. Srivastava. 2017. Effect of coal cleaning on ash composition and its fusion characteristics for a high-ash non-coking coal of India. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 37 (1):1–11. doi:10.1080/19392699.2015.1115399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Y., J. Wang, F. Preto, J. Zhu, and C. Xu. 2012. Ash deposition in biomass combustion or co-firing for power/heat generation. Energies 5:5171–89. doi:10.3390/en5125171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, K., M. Kang, Z. Zhang, J. Jin, Z. Wang, Z. Pan, D. Xu, F. Wu, and B. Xing. 2013. Impact of deashing treatment on biochar structural properties and potential sorption mechanisms of phenanthrene. Environmental Science and Technology 47:11473–81. doi:10.1021/es4026744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D., P. Zhou, H. Yan, P. Shi, and C. Q. Zhou. 2019. Numerical investigation of the effects of size segregation on pulverized coal combustion in a blast furnace. Powder Technology 342:41–53. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., Z. Xueqing, Y. Wen, X. Haihui, H. Sherong, and S. Yu. 2020. Pore structure and its impact on susceptibility to coal spontaneous combustion based on multiscale and multifractal analysis. Scientific Reports 10:7125. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63715-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar