Improvement of embryonic development and clinical outcomes of germinal vesicle stage oocytes using a microvibration culture system

References

• Chian RC, Buckett WM, Tulandi T, Tan SL. 2000. Prospective randomized study of human chorionic gonadotrophin priming before immature oocyte retrieval from unstimulated women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod. 15:165–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chian RC, Uzelac PS, Nargund G. 2013. In vitro maturation of human immature oocytes for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 99:1173–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Rocha AM, Smith GD. 2012. Culture systems: fluid dynamic embryo culture systems (microfluidics). Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 912:355–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fauci LJ, Dillon R. 2006. Biofluidmechanics of reproduction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 38:371–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Lane M. 1993. Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod. 48:377–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gremeau AS, Andreadis N, Fatum M, Craig J, Turner K, McVeigh E, Child T. 2012. In vitro maturation or in vitro fertilization for women with polycystic ovaries? A case-control study of 194 treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 98:355–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammon DS, Wang S, Holyoak GR. 2000. Effects of ammonia during different stages of culture on development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Anim Reprod Sci. 59:23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara T, Matsuura K, Kodama T, Sato K, Kikkawa Y, Muneto T, Tanaka J, Naruse K. 2013. A tilting embryo culture system increases the number of high-grade human blastocysts with high implantation competence. Reprod Biomed Online. 26:260–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennet ML, Combelles CM. 2012. The antral follicle: a microenvironment for oocyte differentiation. Int J Dev Biol. 56:819–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo YS, Cabrera LM, Bormann CL, Shah CT, Takayama S, Smith GD. 2010. Dynamic microfunnel culture enhances mouse embryo development and pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 25:613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur YS, Park JH, Ryu EK, Park SJ, Lee JH, Lee SH, Yoon J, Yoon SH, Hur CY, Lee WD, et al. 2013. Effect of micro-vibration culture system on embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 30:835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isachenko E, Maettner R, Isachenko V, Roth S, Kreienberg R, Sterzik K. 2010. Mechanical agitation during the in vitro culture of human pre-implantation embryos drastically increases the pregnancy rate. Clin Lab. 56:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isachenko V, Maettner R, Sterzik K, Strehler E, Kreinberg R, Hancke K, Roth S, Isachenko E. 2011. In-vitro culture of human embryos with mechanical micro-vibration increases implantation rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 22:536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isachenko V, Sterzik K, Maettner R, Isachenko E, Todorov P, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Strehler E, Pereligin I, Alabart JL, et al. 2017. In vitro microvibration increases implantation rate after embryonic cell transplantation. Cell Transplant. 26:789–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 1994. Radical solutions and cultural problems: could free oxygen radicals be responsible for the impaired development of preimplantation mammalian embryos in vitro? BioEssays. 16:31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike T, Matsuura K, Naruse K, Funahashi H. 2010. In-vitro culture with a tilting device in chemically defined media during meiotic maturation and early development improves the quality of blastocysts derived from in-vitro matured and fertilized porcine oocytes. J Reprod Dev. 56:552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuura K, Hayashi N, Kuroda Y, Takiue C, Hirata R, Takenami M, Aoi Y, Yoshioka N, Habara T, Mukaida T, et al. 2010. Improved development of mouse and human embryos using a tilting embryo culture system. Reprod Biomed Online. 20:358–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizobe Y, Yoshida M, Miyoshi K. 2010. Enhancement of cytoplasmic maturation of in vitro-matured pig oocytes by mechanical vibration. J Reprod Dev. 56:285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltieli Y, Weichselbaum A, Hoffman N, Eibschitz I, Kam Z. 1995. Laser scattering instrument for real time in-vivo measurement of ciliary activity in human fallopian tubes. Hum Reprod. 10:1638–1641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotterdam. 2004. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 81:19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyhan A, Ata B, Son WY, Dahan MH, Tan SL. 2014. Comparison of complication rates and pain scores after transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte pickup procedures for in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 101:705–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son WY, Tan SL. 2010. Laboratory and embryological aspects of hCG-primed in vitro maturation cycles for patients with polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod Update. 16:675–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer C, Mills C, Tan S, Campbell S, Edwards R. 1992. The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 7:117–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Honda T, Hatoya S, Inaba T, Kawate N, Tamada H. 2018. Efficacy of mechanical micro-vibration in the development of bovine embryos during in vitro maturation and culture. J Vet med sci. 80:532–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannus S, Hatirnaz S, Tan J, Ata B, Tan SL, Hatirnaz E, Kenat-Pektas M, Dahan MH. 2018. Predictive factors for live birth after in vitro maturation of oocytes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 297:199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpes A, Sammartano F, Coffaro F, Mistretta V, Scaglione P, Allegra A. 2004. Number of good quality embryos on day 3 is predictive for both pregnancy and implantation rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 82:1330–1336.
   Google Scholar
• Walls ML, Hunter T, Ryan JP, Keelan JA, Nathan E, Hart RJ. 2015. In vitro maturation as an alternative to standard in vitro fertilization for patients diagnosed with polycystic ovaries: a comparative analysis of fresh, frozen and cumulative cycle outcomes. Hum Reprod. 30:88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolchok JC, Brokopp C, Underwood CJ, Tresco PA. 2009. The effect of bioreactor induced vibrational stimulation on extracellular matrix production from human derived fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 30:327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanez LZ, Camarillo DB. 2017. Microfluidic analysis of oocyte and embryo biomechanical properties to improve outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Hum Reprod. 23:235–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon HG, Yoon SH, Son WY, Lee SW, Park SP, Im KS, Lim JH. 2001. Pregnancies resulting from in vitro matured oocytes collected from women with regular menstrual cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 18:325–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Yoon HJ, Juhn KM, Ko JK, Yoon SH, Ko Y, Lim JH. 2011. Application of two different synthetic sequential media for the human IVF-ET program: a prospective, randomized, and comparative study. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 38:186–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zervomanolakis I, Ott HW, Hadziomerovic D, Mattle V, Seeber BE, Virgolini I, Heute D, Kissler S, Leyendecker G, Wildt L. 2007. Physiology of upward transport in the human female genital tract. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1101:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar