Outcome of varicocelectomy on different degrees of total motile sperm count: A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Agarwal R, Short RA, Sabanegh E, Marmar JL. 2007. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 70(3):532–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AYALA C, STEINBERGER E, SMITH DP. 1996. The influence of semen analysis parameters on the fertility potential of infertile couples. J Androl. 17(6):718–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çayan S, Erdemir F, Özbey I, Turek PJ, Kadioğlu A, Tellaloğlu S. 2002. Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies? J Urol. 167(4):1749–1752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges E Jr. 2016. Total motile sperm count: a better way to rate the severity of male factor infertility? JBRA Assisted Reprod. 20(2):47–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayan S, Lee D, Black LD, Reijo Pera RA, Turek PJ. 2001. Response to varicocelectomy in oligospermic men with and without defined genetic infertility. Urology. 57(3):530–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioglu A. 2009. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 30(1):33–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubin JM, Greer AB, Kohn TP, Masterson TA, Ji L, Ramasamy R. 2018. Men with severe oligospermia appear to benefit from varicocele repair: a cost-effectiveness analysis of assisted reproductive technology. Urology. 111:99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzanaty S. 2014. Varicocele repair in non-obstructive azoospermic men: diagnostic value of testicular biopsy–a meta-analysis. Scand J Urol. 48(6):494–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enatsu N, Yamaguchi K, Chiba K, Miyake H, Fujisawa M. 2014. Clinical outcome of microsurgical varicocelectomy in infertile men with severe oligozoospermia. Urology. 83(5):1071–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujisawa M, Dobashi M, Yamasaki T, Okada H, Arakawa S, Kamidono S. 2002. Therapeutic strategy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in the modern assisted reproductive technology era. Urol Res. 30(3):195–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukuda T, Miyake H, Enatsu N, Matsushita K, Fujisawa M. 2015. Assessment of time-dependent changes in semen parameters in infertile men after microsurgical varicocelectomy. Urology. 86(1):48–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg SH. 1977. Varicocele and male fertility. Fertil Steril. 28(7):699–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui X, Chen J, Sun X, Wen R, Chen R, Zheng J, Zhang C. 2006. The value of pre-operative semen analysis as a restore index of fertilizing capacity after varicocelectomy. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 12(2):145–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton J, Cissen M, Brandes M, Smeenk J, De Bruin J, Kremer J, Nelen W, Hamilton C. 2015. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system. Human Reprod. 30(5):1110–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. 2009. A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 172(1):137–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. 2003. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 170(6):2366–2370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jallouli H, Hadj Slimen M, Sahnoun A, Kechou S, Ben Amar S, Bahloul A, Mhiri MN. 2008. [Surgical treatment of varicocele improves fertility and facilitates medically assisted procreation]. Prog Urol. 18(8):543–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal KM, Jarvi K, Zini A. 2001. Microsurgical varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproductive technology: influence of initial semen quality on pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 75(5):1013–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby EW, Wiener LE, Rajanahally S, Crowell K, Coward RM. 2016. Undergoing varicocele repair before assisted reproduction improves pregnancy rate and live birth rate in azoospermic and oligospermic men with a varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 106(6):1338–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks J, McMahon R, Lipshultz L. 1986. Predictive parameters of successful varicocele repair. J Urol. 136(3):609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson TA, Greer AB, Ramasamy R. 2018. Time to improvement in semen parameters after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with severe oligospermia. Can Urol Assoc J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matkov TG, Zenni M, Sandlow J. 2001. Preoperative semen analysis as a predictor of seminal improvement following varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 75:63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehraban D, Taghdiri M, Nategh S, Ahmadzadeh A, Ranjbarnovin N, Taheri APH. 2012. Ultrasonic predictors of improved seminal parameters after bilateral laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 44(4):1121–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. 2005. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 174(5):1926–1931, discussion 1931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor JL, Kent-First M, Muallem A, Van Bergen AH, Nolten WE, Meisner L, Roberts KP. 1997. Microdeletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men. N Engl J Med. 336(8):534–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijo R, Alagappan RK, Page D, Patrizio P. 1996. Severe oligozoospermia resulting from deletions of azoospermia factor gene on Y chromosome. Lancet. 347(9011):1290–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samplaski MK, Lo KC, Grober ED, Zini A, Jarvi KA. 2017. Varicocelectomy to “upgrade” semen quality to allow couples to use less invasive forms of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 108(4):609–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer I, Madersbacher S, Jost R, Hubner WA, Imhof M. 2012. The impact of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 187(5):1540–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrepferman C, Ehle J, Sparks A, Donovan J, Sandlow J. 2000. Preoperative total motile count (TMC) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are predictive of response to varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 74(3):S240.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi T, Nagao K, Aono N, Mori Y, Nakajo Y, Okuda T, Kyono K. 2014. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on semen parameters and clinical outcome in severe male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 102:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumavalavan N, Scovell JM, Balasubramanian A, Kohn TP, Ji B, Hasan A, Pastuszak AW, Lipshultz LI. 2018. The impact of microsurgical repair of subclinical and clinical varicoceles on total motile sperm count: is there a difference? Urology. 120:109–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef T, Abd-Elaal E, Gaballah G, Elhanbly S, Eldosoky E. 2009. Varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: is it beneficial? Int J Surg. 7(4):356–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JW, Xu QQ, Kuang YL, Wang Y, Xu F, Tian YD. 2017. Predictors for spontaneous pregnancy after microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy: a prospective cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol. 49(6):955–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar