The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory

References

• Abell, P. (2004). Narrative explanation: An alternative to variable-centered explanation? Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 287–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell, P. (2009). A case for cases: Comparative narratives in sociological explanation. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(1), 38–70. doi: 10.1177/0049124109339372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2008). Building microfoundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 489–502. doi: 10.1002/mde.1413
   Google Scholar
• Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2010). Causal and constitutive relations, and the squaring of Coleman's diagram: Reply to Vromen. Erkenntnis, 73, 385–391. doi: 10.1007/s10670-010-9238-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2014). Microfoundations of social theory: A response to Jepperson and Meyer. Sociologica, May/August, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Abell, P., Foss, N. J., & Lyngsie, J. (2014). Empirical microfoundations for management research (Working Paper). Department of Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Agassi, J. (1960). Methodological individualism. British Journal of Sociology, 11, 244–270. doi: 10.2307/586749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, B. K., Boyd, C. A., & Pierce, J. C. (2011). Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains. Journal of Management, 37, 395–403. doi: 10.1177/0149206310382456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434–448. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aime, F., Johnson, S., & Ridge, J. W. (2010). The routine may be stable but the advantage is not: Competitive implications of key employee mobility. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 75–87. doi: 10.1002/smj.809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L., & Ren, Y. (2012). Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1375–1382. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01077.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyres, N., Felin, T., Foss, N., & Zenger, T. (2012). Organizational economics of capability and heterogeneity. Organization Science, 23, 1213–1226. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyres, N., & Zenger, T. (2012). Capabilities, transaction costs and firm boundaries. Organization Science 23(6), 1643–1657. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. (2013). Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 197–214. doi: 10.1002/smj.2004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapuji, H., Hora, M., & Saeed, A. M. (2012). Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: Examining the emergence of routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1586–1607. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01063.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. (1938). Functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J., & Felin, T. (2013). What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138–155. doi: 10.5465/amp.2012.0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, F. (1981). Process and form in social life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, F. (2007). Overview: Sixty years in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 1–16. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, F., Gingrich, A., Parkin, R., & Silverman, S. (2005). One discipline, four ways: British, German, French, and American anthropology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M., Balogun, J., & Do, D. (2011). Considering planned change anew: Stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally, and meaningfully. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 1–52. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.567109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27, 14–49. doi: 10.1177/1059601102027001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory. New York, NY: George Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 107–125. doi: 10.1002/smj.2089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I-O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 3–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burk, W. J., Steglich, C. E. G., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 397–404. doi: 10.1177/0165025407077762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek's challenge: An intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B. A., Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2012). Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review, 37, 376–395. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., Ganco, M., Franco, A. M., & Agarwal, R. (2010). Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effect on source firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 65–87. doi: 10.1002/smj.943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 55–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T. N. (1969). Gabriel tarde on communication and social influence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Coff, R. (1997). Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Academic Management Review, 22, 374–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coff, R. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: Resource-based theory and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10, 119–133. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.2.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37, 1429–1443. doi: 10.1177/0149206310397772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. (2012). Perceiving and remembering routine action: Fundamental micro-level origins. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1383–1388. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1964). Introduction to mathematical sociology. London: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1986). Social theory, social research and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309–1335. doi: 10.1086/228423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Devinney, T. (2013). Is microfoundational thinking critical to management thought and practice? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 81–84. doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504–1511. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1962). The rules of sociological method. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizaitonal competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egidi, M., & Narduzzo, A. (1997). The emergence of path-dependent behaviors in cooperative contexts. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), 677–709. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00007-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers, J., & Kaplan, S. (2013). Cognition and capabilities. A multi-level perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 295–340. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.769318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21, 1263–1273. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, H. C. (1965). The transfer of learning. Oxford: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. M. (2007). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1970). Learning theory and mental development. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. W., & Honkapohja, S. (2005). An interview with Thomas J. Sargent. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 9, 561–583. doi: 10.1017/S1365100505050042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T. (2012). Cosmologies of capability, markets and wisdom of crowds: Introduction and comparative agenda. Management and Decision Economics, 33, 283–294. doi: 10.1002/mde.2567
   Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 441–455. doi: 10.1177/1476127005055796
   Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2009). Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and course-correction toward microfoundations. Scandinavian Journal Management, 25, 157–167. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2012). The (proper) microfoundations of routines and capabilities: A response to Winter, Pentland, Hodgson and Knudsen. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8, 271–288. doi: 10.1017/S1744137411000506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., Foss, N., Heimeriks, K., & Madsen, T. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351–1374. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Hesterly, W. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32, 195–218. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.23464020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Koppl, R., & Longo, G. (2014). Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8, 269–282. doi: 10.1002/sej.1184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Knudsen, T. (2012). A theory of nascent entrepreneurship and organization. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33, 409–426. doi: 10.1002/mde.2557
   Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2011). Information aggregation, matching and radical market–hierarchy hybrids: Implications for the theory of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9, 163–173. doi: 10.1177/1476127011408250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (1767). An essay on the history of civil society. London: T. Cadell.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fitza, M. (2013). The use of variance decomposition in the investigation of ceo effects: how large must the ceo effect be to rule out chance? Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1839–1852. doi: 10.1002/smj.2192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. (2003). Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 185–201. doi: 10.1093/icc/12.2.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (2011). Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. Journal of Management, 37, 1413–1428. doi: 10.1177/0149206310390218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Micro-foundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 85–102. doi: 10.5465/amp.2012.0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16, 599–617. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G. (2012). Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1), 267–285. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D., & Ocasio, W. (2007). Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School's past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science, 18, 523–536. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D. A., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005). Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 691–712. doi: 10.1002/smj.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalg, O., & Zollo, M. (2007). Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32, 418–437. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 109–122. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. (2014). Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. Journal of Management, 40(2), 586–615. doi: 10.1177/0149206313513612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hann, C., & Hart, K. (2011). Economic anthropology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. doi: 10.1086/226424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65. doi: 10.1037/h0062474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Philips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74. doi: 10.1002/smj.801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, K., Schmidt, L., Asplund, W., Killham, A., & Agrawal, S. (2010). Causal impact of employee work perceptions on the bottom line of organizations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 378–389. doi: 10.1177/1745691610374589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausknecht, J. P., & Trevor, C. O. (2011). Collective turnover at the group, unit, and organizational levels: Evidence, issues, and implications. Journal of Management, 37, 352–388. doi: 10.1177/0149206310383910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Sitkin, S. (2001). Big-B versus big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 43–58. doi: 10.1002/job.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Klayman, J. (1998). Cognitive repairs: How organizational practices can compensate for individual shortcomings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. (1996). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (in press). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 63–84. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250150906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel toward a reconciliation of old and new institutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 406–418. doi: 10.1177/0002764297040004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1971). Exit, voice and loyalty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, M., Beamish, P., Jackson, S., & Mathieu, J. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academic Management Journal, 50, 1385–1399. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.28166219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmieleski, K. M., Cole, M. S., & Baron, R. A. (2012). Shared authentic leadership and new venture performance. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1467–1499. doi: 10.1177/0149206311415419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2011). Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1500–1516. doi: 10.1002/smj.964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. (2012). The mirage of microfoundations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1389–1394. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01079.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G., & Knudsen, T. (2010). Darwin's conjecture: The search for general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G., & Knudsen, T. (2012). Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause: Some questions for Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 295–298. doi: 10.1017/S1744137411000129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, A. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
   Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. (2013). Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 704–726. doi: 10.1002/smj.2035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M. D., & Jundt, D. K. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input–process–output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M., & Winter, S. (2012). Capabilities: Structure, agency, and evolution. Organization Science, 23(5), 1365–1381. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R., & Meyer, J. (2011). Multiple levels of analysis and the limitations of methodological individualisms. Sociological Theory, 29, 54–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. (2007). What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 97–127. doi: 10.1086/517899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, J., Schilke, O., Brettel, M. (2013). Social capital as a microlevel origin of organizational capabilities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 589–603. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B., Felin, T., & Whetten, D. (2010). Finding the organization in organization theory: A meta-theory of the organization as social actor. Organization Science, 21, 290–305. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen, T., & Levinthal, D. (2007). Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organization Science, 18, 39–54. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 405–425. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<405::AID-SMJ103>3.0.CO;2-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.5.502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S., & Chao, G. T. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in works teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5–6), 335–354. doi: 10.1002/mde.2552
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S., Chao, G., Grand, J., Braun, M., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 581–615. doi: 10.1177/1094428113493119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergence processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martinez, D., Brusoni, S., & Zollo, M. (2010). The neuroscientific foundations of the exploration–exploitation dilemma. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology and Economics, 3, 95–115. doi: 10.1037/a0018495
   Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martinez, D., Brusoni, S., Canessa, N., & Zollo, M. (2015). Understanding the exploration-exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 319–338. doi: 10.1002/smj.2221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. doi: 10.1177/1056492610387222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Menzel, H. (1961). On the relation between individual and collective properties. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), A sociological reader on complex organizations (pp. 499–516). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2007). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi: 10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, A. (1968). On Keynesian economics and the economics of Keynes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, A., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. (2011). Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22(1), 81–98. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberson, S., & O'Connor, J.F. (1972). Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large corporations. American Sociological Review, 37(2), 117–130. doi: 10.2307/2094020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.61031808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberg, S., Foss, N., & Wittek, R. (2014). Why routines decline (Copenhagen Business School working paper). Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. (2003a). The payments perspective: Micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 903–927. doi: 10.1002/smj.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. (2003b). A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1069–1086. doi: 10.1002/smj.345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design and status of group agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (1991). Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loch, C., Segupta, K., & Ahmad, M. (2013). The microevolution of routines: How problem solving and social preferences interact. Organizational Science, 24, 99–115. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. (2008). The effect of CEOs on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1357–1367. doi: 10.1002/smj.708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macy, M. W., & Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. (1998). Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science, 9(3), 326–339. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.3.326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, K., Sumelius, J., Höglund, M., & Ahlvik, C. (2012). Determinants of strategic HR capabilities in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1459–1483. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24, 662–678. doi: 10.2307/2128040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., & Chen, G. (2011). The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management, 37, 610–641. doi: 10.1177/0149206310364663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2013). A Review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40, 130–160. doi: 10.1177/0149206313503014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGahan, A., & Porter, M. (1997). How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, 18, 15–30. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<15::AID-SMJ916>3.3.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, B., & Andriani, P. (2005). Why Gaussian statistics are mostly wrong for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 3, 219–228. doi: 10.1177/1476127005052700
   Google Scholar
• Menger, C. (1883). Untersuchungen uber die method der socialwissenschaften und der oekonomie insbesondere. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Bromley, P. (2013). The worldwide expansion of “organization”. Sociological Theory, 31(4), 366–389. doi: 10.1177/0735275113513264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Rowan, B., (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., Pentland, B., & Choi, S. (2012). Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1536–1558. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., Pentland, B., & Choi, S. (2014). The role of transactive memory in the formation of organizational routines. Strategic Organization, 12, 109–133. doi: 10.1177/1476127014521609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J., (1992). Economics, organization and management. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Minbaeva, D., Makela, K., & Rabbiosi, L. (2012). HRM and knowledge transfer via individual-level mechanisms. Human Resource Management, 51, 387–405. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2014). Microfoundations of strategic management: Towards micro-macro research in the resource-based theory. Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollick, E. (2012). People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1001–1015. doi: 10.1002/smj.1958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, J. C., Ployhart, R. E., & Wright, P. M. (2011). The myth of “the” micro–macro divide: Bridging system-level and disciplinary divides. Journal of Management, 37, 581–609. doi: 10.1177/0149206310365000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2008). The case for behavioral decision research in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 399–431. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S., Hammond, R., & Snell, S. (2014). A microfoundations approach to transnational capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 405–427. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2014.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 39–53). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Murmann, J. P., Aldrich, H., Levinthal, D., & Winter, S. (2003). Evolutionary thought in management and organization theory in the beginning of the new millennium: A symposium on the state of the art and opportunities for future research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 22–40. doi: 10.1177/1056492602250516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2008). Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1371–1394, 1429–1449. doi: 10.1002/smj.718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paruchuri, S., & Eisenman, M. (2012). Microfoundations of firm R&D capabilities: A study of inventor networks in a merger. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1509–1535. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. (2011). The foundation is solid, if you know where to look: comment on Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economic, 7(2), 279–293. doi: 10.1017/S174413741000041X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B., Feldman, M., Becker, M., & Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1484–1508. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., Walumbwa, O., Byron, K., & Myrowitz, J. (2009). CEO positive psychological traits, transformational leadership, and firm performance in high-technology start-up and established firms. Journal of Management, 35, 348–368. doi: 10.1177/0149206307312512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E. (2012). Multilevel selection and the paradox of sustained competitive advantage. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of assessment and selection (pp. 667–685). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., & Hale, D. (2014). The fascinating psychological microfoundations of strategy and competitive advantage. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 145–172. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091312
   Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36, 127–150. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.55662569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., & Schneider, B. (2012). The organizational context of personnel selection. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of assessment and selection (pp. 48–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., Nyberg, A. J., Reilly, G., & Maltarich, M. A. (2014). Human capital is dead; Long live human capital resources. Journal of Management, 40, 371–398. doi: 10.1177/0149206313512152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, P. (1957). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Porac, J., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 224–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porac, J., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00736.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. W. (1966). Personnel management. Annual Review of Psychology, 17, 395–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.17.020166.002143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. W., & Schneider, B. (2014). What was, what is, and what may be in OP/OB. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091302
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1369–1386. doi: 10.1002/smj.968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145. doi: 10.2307/2393988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranam, P., Stieglitz, N., Osman, M., & Pillutla, M. M. (in press). Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. The Academy of Management Annals.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reger, R. K., & Huff, A. S. (1993). Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 103–123. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. (2003). Selling system dynamics to (other) social scientists. System Dynamics Review, 19, 303–327. doi: 10.1002/sdr.278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan, M., & Mors, M. L. (2014). A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organization Science, 25(6), 1860–1877. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation drive by individual-, firm- and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18, 898–921. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of levels in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–13. doi: 10.1002/job.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelt, R. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167–185. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250120302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., Schmit, M. J., & Johnson, R. (1996). Attitudes and Effectiveness: Examining relations at an organizational level. Personnel Psychology, 49, 853–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1984). The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. American Economic Review, 76(4), 716–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1986). The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. American Economic Review, 76, 716–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satz, D., & Ferejohn, J. (1994). Rational choice and social theory. Journal of Philosophy, 91(2), 71–87. doi: 10.2307/2940928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Schmalensee, R. (1985). Do markets differ much. American Economic Review, 75(3), 341–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2012). A funny thing happened on the way to the future: The focus on organizational competitive advantage lost out. Industrial Organizational Psychology, 5, 96–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01411.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Smith, B., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2003). Which comes first: Employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 836–851. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Smith, D., & Sipe, W. P. (2000). Personnel selection psychology: Multilevel considerations. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new direction (pp. 91–120). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism old and new. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270–277. doi: 10.2307/2393719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. doi: 10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2007). Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 87–104. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45–62. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). New York, NY: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, W. C., & Felin, T. (2013). Game theory, conditional preferences and social influence. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e56751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056751
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350. doi: 10.1002/smj.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (1984). The limits of neoclassical theory in management education. American Economic Review, 74(2), 116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tollefsen, D. (2002). Collective intentionality and the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32(1), 25–50. doi: 10.1177/004839310203200102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Udehn, L. (2001). Methodological individualism: Background, history and meaning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Udehn, L. (2002). The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 479–507. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 447–504. doi: 10.1086/432782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H., Foss, N., & Lyles, M. (2010). Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931–951. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vromen, J. (2010). Micro-foundations in strategic management: Squaring Coleman's diagram. Erkenntnis, 73(3), 365–383. doi: 10.1007/s10670-010-9237-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. R. (1979). Microfoundations: The compatibility of microeconomics and macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D., Felin, T., & King, B. (2009). The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 35, 537–563. doi: 10.1177/0149206308330556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J. W. (1996). Linking survey results to customer satisfaction and business performance. In A. Kraut (Ed.), Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change (pp. 330–359). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. (2011). Problems at the foundation? Comments on Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 257–277. doi: 10.1017/S1744137410000470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. (2013). Habit, deliberation and action: Strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 120–137. doi: 10.5465/amp.2012.0124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenger, T., Felin, T., & Bigelow, L. (2011). Theories of the firm-market boundary. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 89–133. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenger, T. R. (1994). Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: The allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Science, 40, 708–729. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.6.708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenger, T. R., & Hesterly, W. S. (1997). The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units. Organization Science, 8, 209–222. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.3.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339–351. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398–1438. doi: 10.1086/210178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar