2,979
Views
79
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Practical Relevance of Management Research: Turning the Debate on Relevance into a Rigorous Scientific Research Program

, &

References

  • AACSB. (2008). Final report of AACSB international. Impact of research. Tampa, FL: The Advanced Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business.
  • Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254–285.
  • Abrahamson, E., & Eisenman, M. (2001). Why management scholars must intervene strategically in the management knowledge market. Human Relations, 54(1), 67–75. doi: 10.1177/0018726701541009
  • Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708–740. doi: 10.2307/2667053
  • Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (2001). Knowledge industries and idea entrepreneurs: New dimensions of innovative products, services, and organizations. In C. B. Schoonhoven & E. Romanelli (Eds.), The entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries (pp. 147–177). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Academy of Management Perspectives. (2009). New direction and look for Academy of Management Perspectives. Retrieved from http://www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?id=44&page_id=215
  • Aldag, R. J. (1997). Moving sofas and exhuming woodchucks on relevance, impact, and the following of fads. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(1), 8–16. doi: 10.1177/105649269761003
  • Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P. W., Marsh, M., & Kramer, S. J. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418–431. doi: 10.2307/3069464
  • American Task Force on the Development of Marketing Thought. (1988). Developing, disseminating, and utilizing marketing knowledge. The Journal of Marketing, 52, 1–25.
  • Argyris, C. (Ed.). (2003). Actionable knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain-Smith, D. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. (2007). Evidence-based management in health care organizations: A critique of its assumptions. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007(1), 1–6. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26516028
  • Astley, W. G. (1985a). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 497–513. doi: 10.2307/2392694
  • Astley, W. G. (1985b). Organizational size and bureaucratic structure. Organization Studies, 6(3), 201–228. doi: 10.1177/017084068500600301
  • Astley, W. G., & Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3(4), 443–460. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.4.443
  • Augier, M., & March, J. G. (2007). The pursuit of relevance in management education. California Management Review, 49(3), 129–146. doi: 10.2307/41166398
  • Augier, M., & March, J. G. (2011). The roots, rituals, and rhetorics of change: North American business schools after the Second World War. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
  • Axelsson, R. (1998). Towards an evidence based health care management. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 13(4), 307–317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199810/12)13:4<307::AID-HPM525>3.0.CO;2-V
  • Bach, G. L. (1958). Some observations on the business school of tomorrow. Management Science, 4(4), 351–364. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.4.4.351
  • Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.
  • Bansal, P., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., MacConnachie, P., & O'Brien, J. (2012). Bridging the research–practice gap. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 73–92. doi: 10.5465/amp.2011.0140
  • Barends, E., ten Have, S., & Huisman, F. (2012). Learning from other evidence-based practices: The case of medicine. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 25–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Barley, S. R., Meyer, G. W., & Gash, D. C. (1988). Cultures of culture: Academics, practitioners and the pragmatics of normative control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 24–60. doi: 10.2307/2392854
  • Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2001). The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 124–188). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Bartunek, J. M. (2011a). Commentary on “Research utilization: Bridging a culture gap between communities” Reflecting on research utilization with Janice Beyer. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(4), 392–394. doi: 10.1177/1056492611421076
  • Bartunek, J. M. (2011b). What has happened to mode 2? British Journal of Management, 22(3), 555–558.
  • Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: What's in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 100–117. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2010.48661194
  • Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181–1201. doi: 10.1177/0149206314529160
  • Bechmann, G. (2003). The rise and crisis of scientific expertise. In G. Bechmann & I. Hronszky (Eds.), Expertise and Its interfaces: The tense relationship of science and politics (pp. 17–34). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
  • Beck, U., & Bonß, W. (1991). Verwendungsforschung—Umsetzung wissenschaftlichen Wissens. In U. Flick, E. v. Kardorff, H. Keupp, L. v. Rosenstiel, & S. Wolff (Eds.), Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen (pp. 416–419). Munich: Psychologie Verlags Union.
  • Beech, N., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2010). Dialogues between academics and practitioners: The role of generative dialogic encounters. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1341–1367. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374396
  • Beer, M. (2001). Why management research findings are unimplementable: An action science perspective. Reflections: The SoL Journal, 2(3), 58–65. doi: 10.1162/152417301570383
  • Beer, M. (2011). Making a difference and contributing useful knowledge—principles derived from life as a scholar-practitioner. In S. A. Mohrman & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice (pp. 147–168). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Behrman, J. N., & Levin, R. I. (1984). Are business schools doing their job. Harvard Business Review, 62(1), 140–147.
  • Benders, J., & van Bijsterveld, M. (2000). Leaning on lean: The reception of a management fashion in Germany. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15, 50–64. doi: 10.1111/1468-005X.00064
  • Bennis, W. G., & O'Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.
  • Bettis, R. A. (1991). Strategic management and the straightjacket: An editorial essay. Organization Science, 2(3), 315–319. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.3.315
  • Beyer, J. M. (1982). Introduction. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 588–590. doi: 10.2307/2392533
  • Beyer, J. M. (1997). Research utilization bridging a cultural gap between communities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(1), 17–22. doi: 10.1177/105649269761004
  • Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 591–622. doi: 10.2307/2392533
  • Bijker, W. E., Bal, R., & Hendriks, R. (2009). The paradox of scientific authority: The role of scientific advice in democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bimber, B. (1996). The politics of expert advice in congress. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2010). How politics deals with expert dissent: The case of ethics councils. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(6), 888–914. doi: 10.1177/0162243909357913
  • Böschen, S., Kastenhofer, K., Rust, I., Soentgen, J., & Wehling, P. (2010). Scientific nonknowledge and its political dynamics: The cases of agri-biotechnology and mobile phoning. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(6), 783–811. doi: 10.1177/0162243909357911
  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The scholastic point of view. Cultural anthropology, 5(4), 380–391. doi: 10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00030
  • Brennan, R., & Ankers, P. (2004). In search of relevance: Is there an academic-practitioner divide in business-to-business marketing? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(5), 511–519. doi: 10.1108/02634500410551897
  • Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 19–32. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2009.45590138
  • Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01287.x
  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40–57. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
  • Buckley, M. R., Ferris, G. R., Bernardin, H. J., & Harvey, M. G. (1998). The disconnect between the science and practice of management. Business Horizons, 41(2), 31–38. doi: 10.1016/S0007-6813(98)90032-5
  • Burgoyne, J., & James, K. T. (2006). Towards best or better practice in corporate leadership development: Operational issues in mode 2 and design science research. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 303–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00468.x
  • Burrell, G. (1996). Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 642–658). London: Sage.
  • Butter, F. A. G. den, & Mosch, R. H. J. (2003). The Dutch miracle: Institutions, networks, and trust. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159(2), 362–391. doi: 10.1628/0932456032974844
  • Cabantous, L., & Gond, J. P. (2011). Rational decision making as performative praxis: Explaining rationality's eternel retour. Organization Science, 22(3), 573–586. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0534
  • Cascio, W. F. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … bridge application and scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(4), 455–468. doi: 10.1002/job.528
  • Charan, R., Aines, R. O., Ball, B. C., Knoepfel, R. W., & Lancey, R. C. (Eds.). (1979). Practitioners views: Policy and planning research. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
  • Charlier, S. D., Brown, K. G., & Rynes, S. L. (2011). Teaching evidence-based management in MBA programs: What evidence is there? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2), 222–236. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2011.62798931
  • Cherns, A. B. (1968). The Use of the social sciences. Human Relations, 21(4), 313–325. doi: 10.1177/001872676802100401
  • Cherns, A. B. (1972). Models for the use of research. Human Relations, 25(1), 25–33. doi: 10.1177/001872677202500103
  • Chi Vo, L., Mounoud, E., & Rose, J. (2012). Dealing with the opposition of rigor and relevance from Dewey's pragmatist perspective. Management, 15(4), 368–390.
  • Choudhury, N. (1986). In search of relevance in management accounting research. Accounting & Business Research, 17(65), 21–32. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1986.9729778
  • Churchman, C. W. (1964). Managerial acceptance of scientific recommendations. California Management Review, 7(1), 31–38. doi: 10.2307/41165618
  • Clinebell, S. K., & Clinebell, J. M. (2008). The tension in business education between academic rigor and real-world relevance: The role of executive professors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 99–107. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2008.31413867
  • Coghlan, D. (2011). Action research: Exploring perspectives on a philosophy of practical knowing. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 53–87. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.571520
  • Cohen, D. J. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management: Reasons for the divide and concrete solutions for bridging the gap. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1013–1019. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.27151946
  • Corburn, J. (2005). Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.55662499
  • Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Daft, R. L., & Buenger, V. (1990). Hitching a ride on a fast train to nowhere: The past and future of strategic management research. In G. J. Fredrickson (Ed.), Perspectives on strategic management (pp. 81–103). New York, NY: Harper Business.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (1990). Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organization Science, 1(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1.1.1
  • Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (2008). Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science, 19, 177–183. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0346
  • DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (2005). What's really wrong with US business schools. SSRN working paper. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=766404
  • Dehler, G. E. (1998). “Relevance” in management research: A critical reappraisal. Management Learning, 29(1), 69–89. doi: 10.1177/1350507698291004
  • DeNisi, A. S. (1994). Is relevant research irrelevant? On evaluating the contribution of research to management practice. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6(2), 145–159.
  • Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413. doi: 10.1177/0170840607088020
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Lexington, MA: Heath.
  • Donaldson, L. (1992). The Weick stuff: Managing beyond games. Organization Science, 3(4), 461–466. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.4.461
  • Donaldson, L. (2002). Damned by our own theories: Contradictions between theories and management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 96–106. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2002.7373701
  • Donham, W. B. (1922). Essential groundwork for a broad executive theory. Harvard Business Review, 1(1), 1–10.
  • Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Dunbar, R. L. M. (1983). Toward an applied administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 129–144. doi: 10.2307/2392390
  • Dunbar, R. L. M., & Bresser, R. F. (2014). Knowledge generation and governance in management research. Journal of Business Economics, 84(1), 129–144. doi: 10.1007/s11573-013-0693-1
  • Duncan, W. J. (1972). The knowledge utilization process in management and organization. Academy of Management Journal, 15(3), 273–287. doi: 10.2307/254853
  • Duncan, W. J. (1974). Management theory and the practice of management. Business Horizons, 17(5), 48–52. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(74)90037-8
  • Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for management research. British Journal of Management, 7(1), 75–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00107.x
  • Elden, M., & Chisholm, R. (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46, 121–142. doi: 10.1177/001872679304600201
  • Estabrooks, C. A. (1999). Mapping the research utilization field in nursing. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 31(1), 53–72.
  • Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2009). Performativity of theory, arbitrary conventions, and possible worlds: A reality check. Organization Science, 20(3), 676–678. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0433
  • Ferguson, L. L. (1966). How social science research can help management. California Management Review, 8(4), 3–10. doi: 10.2307/41165693
  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005a). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281412
  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005b). Prescriptions are not enough. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 32–35. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281419
  • Foster, M. (1972). An introduction to the theory and practice of action research in work organizations. Human Relations, 25, 529–556. doi: 10.1177/001872677202500605
  • Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53(1), 7–32. doi: 10.1177/0018726700531002
  • Frank, G., & Kieser, A. (2013). Kann man Management-Wissenschaft nach dem Muster der evidenz-basierten Medizin betreiben? Die Betriebswirtschaft, 73(3), 167–181.
  • Frese, M., Bausch, A., Schmidt, P., Rauch, A., & Kabst, R. (2012). Evidence-based entrepreneurship (EBE): A systematic approach to cumulative science. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 92–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frese, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Wiklund, J. (2014). The emergence of evidence-based entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 38, 209–216. doi: 10.1111/etap.12094
  • Galbraith, J. R. (1980). Applying the theory of managemenz of organizations. In W. M. Evans (Ed.), Frontiers in organization and management (pp. 151–167). New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558
  • Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Godin, B. (1998). Writing performative history: The New New Atlantis? Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 465–483. doi: 10.1177/030631298028003004
  • Gopinath, C., & Hoffman, R. C. (1995a). The relevance of strategy research: Practitioner and academic viewpoints. Journal of Management Studies, 32(5), 575–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00789.x
  • Gopinath, C., & Hoffman, R. C. (1995b). A comment on the relevance of strategy research. Advances in Strategic Management, 12, 93–110.
  • Gordon, R. A., & Howell, J. E. (1959a). Higher education for business. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Gordon, R. A., & Howell, J. E. (1959b). Higher education for business. The Journal of Business Education, 35(3), 115–117. doi: 10.1080/08832323.1959.10116245
  • Grayson, C. J. (1973). Management science and business practice. Harvard Business Review, 51(4), 41–48.
  • Greenwood, D. J. (2002). Action research: Unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges. Concepts and Transformation, 7(2), 117–139. doi: 10.1075/cat.7.2.02gre
  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Grey, C. (2001). Re-imagining relevance: A response to Starkey and Madan. British Journal of Management, 12(s1), S27–S32. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.3
  • Gruber, W. H., & Niles, J. S. (1975). The science-technology-utilization relationship in management. Management Science, 21(8), 956–963. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.21.8.956
  • Gulati, R. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 775–782. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279170
  • Gustavsen, B. (2003). New forms of knowledge production and the role of action research. Action Research, 1(2), 153–164. doi: 10.1177/14767503030012003
  • Haire, M. (1964). The social sciences and management practices: Why have the social sciences contributed so little to the practice of management? California Management Review, 6, 3–10. doi: 10.2307/41165601
  • Halffman, W., & Hoppe, R. (2005). Science/policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice. In S. Maasen & P. Weingart (Eds.), Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision making (pp. 135–151). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
  • Hambrick, D. C. (1994). 1993 presidential address: What if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11–16.
  • Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York, NY: SCM Press.
  • Heinrichs, H. (2005). Advisory systems in pluralistic knowledge societies: A criteria-based typology to assess and optimize environmental policy advice. In S. Maasen & P. Weingart (Eds.), Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision making (pp. 41–62). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
  • Hessels, L. K., & Van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740–760. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008
  • Hewison, A. (2004). Evidence-based management in the NHS: Is it possible? Journal of Health Organization and Management, 18(5), 336–348. doi: 10.1108/14777260410560839
  • Hilgartner, S. (2001). Science on stage: Expert advice as public drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Hilgert, R. L. (1972). Business schools fail to communicate with managers. Business Horizons, 15(6), 59–63. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(72)90062-6
  • Hodgkinson, G. P. (2011). Why evidence-based practice in I–O psychology is not there yet: Going beyond systematic reviews. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 49–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01294.x
  • Hodgkinson, G. P. (2012). The politics of evidence-based decision making. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 404–419). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hodgkinson, G. P., Herriot, P., & Anderson, N. (2001). Re-aligning the stakeholders in management research: Lessons from industrial, work and organizational psychology. British Journal of Management, 12, S41–S48. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.5
  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Starkey, K. (2011). Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again: Reframing relevance. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 355–369.
  • Holmström, J., Ketokivi, M., & Hameri, A. P. (2009). Bridging practice and theory: A design science approach. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 65–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.x
  • Huberman, M. (1987). Steps toward an integrated model of research utilization. Science Communication, 8(4), 586–611. doi: 10.1177/0164025987008004002
  • Huberman, M. (1994). Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy, 7(4), 13–33. doi: 10.1007/BF02696290
  • Huff, A. S. (2000). Changes in organizational knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 288–293.
  • Huff, A. S., & Huff, J. O. (2001). Re-focusing the business school agenda. British Journal of Management, 12(s1), S49–S54. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.6
  • Jarzabkowski, P., Mohrman, S. A., & Scherer, A. G. (2010). Organization studies as applied science: The generation and use of academic knowledge about organizations introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1189–1207. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374394
  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Wilson, D. C. (2006). Actionable strategy knowledge: A practice perspective. European Management Journal, 24(5), 348–367. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2006.05.009
  • Jasanoff, S. (1994). The fifth branch. science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge.
  • Jelinek, M., Romme, A. G. L., & Boland, R. J. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: Organization studies as a science for design: Creating collaborative artifacts and research. Organization Studies, 29(3), 317–329. doi: 10.1177/0170840607088016
  • Kelemen, M., & Bansal, P. (2002). The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management, 13(2), 97–108. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00225
  • Khurana, R., & Spender, J. C. (2012). Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: More than “a problem in organizational design”. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 619–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01040.x
  • Kieser, A. (1997). Myth and rhetoric in management fashion. Organization, 4, 49–74. doi: 10.1177/135050849741004
  • Kieser, A. (2002). On communication barriers between management science, consultancies and business companies. In T. Clark & R. Fincham (Eds.), Critical consulting (pp. 206–227). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00831.x
  • Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2011). Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 14–28. doi: 10.1177/1056492611411923
  • Kieser, A., & Nicolai, A. T. (2005). Success factor research overcoming the trade-off between rigor and relevance? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(3), 275–279. doi: 10.1177/1056492605279098
  • Knorr, K. D. (1977). Policymakers' use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 165–182). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Langlois, R. N. (2000, August 4–9). Strategy as economics versus economics as strategy. Paper for the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Toronto.
  • Latham, G. P. (2007). A speculative perspective on the transfer of behavioral science findings to the workplace: “The times they are a-changin”. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1027–1032. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.27153899
  • Learmonth, M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”? A commentary on Rousseau's 2005 presidential address. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1089–1091. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.22528177
  • Learmonth, M. (2008). Speaking out: Evidence-based management: A backlash against pluralism in organizational studies? Organization, 15(2), 283–291. doi: 10.1177/1350508407087763
  • Learmonth, M., & Harding, N. (2006). Evidence-based management: The very idea. Public Administration, 84(2), 245–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00001.x
  • Leisenring, J. J., & Johnson, L. T. (1994). Accounting research: On the relevance of research to practice. Accounting Horizons, 8, 74–79.
  • Lengwiler, M. (2008). Participatory approaches in science and technology: Historical origins and current practices. Science, Technology, & Human Value, 33, 186–200. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311262
  • Lentsch, J., & Weingart, P. (2011). Introduction: The quest for quality as a challenge to scientific policy advice: An overdue debate? In J. Lentsch & P. Weingart (Eds.), The politics of scientific advice: Institutional design for quality assurance (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levidow, L. (1999). Britain's biotechnology controversy: Elusive science, contested expertise. New Genetics and Society, 18, 47–64. doi: 10.1080/14636779908656889
  • Levin, M., & Greenwood, D. J. (2001). Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 103–113). London: Sage.
  • Levin, M., & Greenwood, D. J. (Eds.). (2008). The future of universities: Action research and the transformation of higher education. London: Sage.
  • Lorsch, J. W. (1978). Making behavioral science more useful. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 171–180.
  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767217
  • Lynton, E. A. (1984). The missing connection between business and the universities (American Council on Education/Macmillan Series on Higher Education: ERIC). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Maasen, S., & Weingart, P. (2005). What's new in scientific advice to politics? In S. Maasen & P. Weingart (Eds.), Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision making (pp. 1–19). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 107–145. doi: 10.1086/374404
  • MacLean, D., MacIntosh, R., & Grant, S. (2002). Mode 2 management research. British Journal of Management, 13(3), 189–207. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00237
  • Mann, F., & Likert, R. (1952). The need for research on the communication of research results. Human Organization, 11(4), 15–19. doi: 10.17730/humo.11.4.k6p20p687j667144
  • March, J. G. (2006). Ideas as art. Interview by Dane Cutu. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 82–89.
  • March, J. G., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science, 8(6), 698–706. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.6.698
  • Marcus, A. A., Goodman, R. S., & Grazman, D. N. (1995). The diffusion of strategic management frameworks. Advances in Strategic Management, 12, 115–145.
  • McGahan, A. (2007). Academic research that matters to managers: On zebras, dogs, lemmings, hammers, and turnips. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 748–753. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279166
  • McKelvey, B. (2006). Van De Ven and Johnson's “engaged scholarship”: Nice try, but … . Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 822–829. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.22527451
  • Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8, 193–210. doi: 10.2307/4609267
  • Mesny, A., & Mailhot, C. (2012). Control and traceability of research impact on practice: Reframing the “relevance gap” debate in management. Management, 15, 180–207.
  • Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers, not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Franciscost, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Mintzberg, H., & Quinn, J. B. (1996). Introduction. In H. Mintzberg & J.B. Quinn (Eds.), The strategy processconcepts, contexts, cases (3rd ed., pp. xi–xviii). New Jersey, CA: Prentice Hall Europe.
  • Mitchell, F. (2002). Research and practice in management accounting: Improving integration and communication. European Accounting Review, 11(2), 277–289. doi: 10.1080/09638180020017087
  • Mohrman, S., Pasmore, W., Shani, A. B., Stymne, B., & Adler, N. (Eds.). (2008). Toward building a collaborative research community. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Morrell, K. (2008). The narrative of evidence based management: A polemic. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 613–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00755.x
  • Mulkay, M., Pinch, T., & Ashmore, M. (1987). Colonizing the mind: Dilemmas in the application of social science. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 231–256. doi: 10.1177/030631287017002002
  • Muth, J. F. (1961). Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica, 29(3), 315–335. doi: 10.2307/1909635
  • Nicolai, A., & Seidl, D. (2010). That's relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1257–1285. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374401
  • Nicolai, A. T. (2004). The bridge to the “real world”: Applied science or a “schizophrenic tour de force”? Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 951–976. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00462.x
  • Nicolai, A. T., & Dautwiz, J. (2010). Fuzziness in action: What consequences has the linguistic ambiguity of the core competence concept for organizational usage? British Journal of Management, 20, 1–12.
  • Nowotny, H. S., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, CA: Polity.
  • Numagami, T. (1998). The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organization Science, 9(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.1.1
  • Nyilasy, G., & Reid, L. N. (2007). The academician-practitioner gap in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 26(4), 425–445.
  • O'Toole, J. (Ed.). (2011). On the verge of extinctionsome final reptilian thoughts. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Oviatt, B. M., & Miller, W. D. (1989). Irrelevance, intransigence, and business professors. Academy of Management Executive, 3(4), 304–312. doi: 10.5465/AME.1989.4277409
  • Owens, S. (2011). Knowledge, advice and influence: The role of the UK royal commission on environmental pollution, 1970–2009. In J. Lentsch & P. Weingart (Eds.), The politics of scientific advice: Institutional design for quality assurance (pp. 73–101). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pandza, K., & Thorpe, R. (2010). Management as design, but what kind of design? An appraisal of the design science analogy for management. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 171–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00623.x
  • Pascal, A., Thomas, C., & Romme, A. G. L. (2013). Developing a human-centred and science-based approach to design: The knowledge management platform project. British Journal of Management, 24(2), 264–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00802.x
  • Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8, 157–181. doi: 10.1177/1358902002008002512
  • Pearce, J. L., & Huang, L. (2012). The decreasing value of our research to management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 247–262. doi: 10.5465/amle.2011.0554
  • Pelz, D. C. (1978). Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy. In M. Yinger & S. J. Cutler (Eds.), Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view (pp. 346–357). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best run companies. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1998). Six dangerous myths about pay. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 109–119.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (1999). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006a). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 62–74.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006b). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2013). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Pierson, F. C. (1959a). The education of American businessmen: A study of university-college programs in business administration. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Pierson, F. C. (1959b). The education of American businessmen. The Journal of Business Education, 35(3), 114–117. doi: 10.1080/08832323.1959.10116244
  • Porter, L. W., & McKibbin, L. E. (1988). Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century? Hightstown, NJ: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence and the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91.
  • Rapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research with special reference to the Tavistock experience. Human Relations, 23(6), 499–513. doi: 10.1177/001872677002300601
  • Rasche, A., & Behnam, M. (2009). As if it were relevant A systems theoretical perspective on the relation between science and practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 243–255.
  • Reason, P. (2006). Choice and quality in action research practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 187–203. doi: 10.1177/1056492606288074
  • Reay, P., Whitney, B., & Kohn, M. (2009). What's the evidence on evidence-based management? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 5–18. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2009.45590137
  • Rich, R. F. (1977). Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action vs. knowledge for understanding. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social science in public policy making (pp. 199–233). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Rich, R. F. (1991). Knowledge creation, diffusion, and utilization perspectives of the founding editor of knowledge. Science Communication, 12(3), 319–337. doi: 10.1177/107554709101200308
  • Rip, A. (2000). Fashions, lock-ins and the heterogeneity of knowledge production. In M. Jacob & T. Hellstrom (Eds.), The future of knowledge production in the academy (pp. 28–39). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769
  • Romme, A. G. L., & Endenburg, G. (2006). Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design. Organization Science, 17(2), 287–297. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0169
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2006). 2005 presidential address: Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256–269. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208679
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2007). A sticky, leveraging, and scalable strategy for high-quality connections between organizational practice and science. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1037–1042. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.27155539
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2012). Envisioning evidence-based management. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 3–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rousseau, D. M., & Boudreau, J. W. (2011). Sticky findings: Research evidence practitioners find useful. In S. A. Mohrman & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice (pp. 351–368). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 475–515. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211651
  • Rousseau, D. M., & McCarthy, S. (2007). Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 84–101. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2007.24401705
  • Roux, D. J., Rogers, K. H., Biggs, H. C., Ashton, P. J., & Sergeant, A. (2006). Bridging the science-management divide: Moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 23–42.
  • Ryan, W. G. (1977). Management practice and research—Poles apart. Business Horizons, 20(3), 23–29. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(77)90067-2
  • Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340–355. doi: 10.2307/3069460
  • Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & Brown, K. G. (2002). HR professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management, 41(2), 149–174. doi: 10.1002/hrm.10029
  • Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005). Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay-for-performance. In S. Fiske, D. L. Schacter, & A. Kasdin (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 571–600). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 987–1008. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.27151939
  • Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (Eds.). (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Salipante, P., & Aram, J. D. (2003). Managers as knowledge generators: The nature of practitioner-scholar research in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 129–150. doi: 10.1002/nml.26
  • Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338–360. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330942
  • Schendel, D. (1995). Notes from the editor-in-chief. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 1–2.
  • Schulz, A.-C., & Nicolai, A. T. (in press). The intellectual link between management research and popularization media: A bibliometric analysis of the Harvard Business Review. Academy of Management Learning & Education.
  • Seidl, D. (2007). General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: A systemic-discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 28(2), 197–218. doi: 10.1177/0170840606067994
  • Seidl, D. (2009). Productive misunderstandings between organisation science and organisation practice: The science-practice relation from the perspective of Niklas Luhmann's theory of autopoietic systems. In R. Magalhaes & R. Sanchez (Eds.), Autopoiesis in organization theory and practice (pp. 133–148). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Shapiro, D. L., Kirkman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. (2007). Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 249–266. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634433
  • Shinn, T. (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599–614. doi: 10.1177/030631202128967271
  • Shrivastava, P., & Mitroff, I. I. (1984). Enhancing organizational research utilization: The role of decision makers' assumptions. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 18–26.
  • Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Simon, H. A. (1988). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560. doi: 10.1177/0018726708101984
  • Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (2011). Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(1), 98–120. doi: 10.1177/0021886310396322
  • Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (in press). Practical relevance of practice-based research on strategy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A., & Tempest, S. (2009). Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 547–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00833.x
  • Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12, S3–S26. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.2
  • Staw, B. (1995). Repairs on the road to relevance and rigor: Some unexplored issues in publishing organizational research. In L. Cummings & P. Frost (Eds.), Foundations for organizational science (2nd ed., pp. 85–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Steffens, P. R., Weeks, C. S., Davidsson, P., & Isaak, L. (2014). Shouting from the ivory tower: A marketing approach to improve communication of academic research to entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 399–426. doi: 10.1111/etap.12079
  • Stehr, N. (1992). Practical knowledge: Applying the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Stilgoe, J. (2005). Controlling mobile phone health risks in the UK: A fragile discourse of compliance. Science and Public Policy, 32, 55–64. doi: 10.3152/147154305781779704
  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2001). Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms. Human Relations, 54, 933–953. doi: 10.1177/0018726701547007
  • Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582–603. doi: 10.2307/2392581
  • Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Robertson, M., Newell, S., & Dopson, S. (2010). When policy meets practice: Colliding logics and the challenges of “mode 2” initiatives in the translation of academic knowledge. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1311–1340. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374402
  • Terry, G. R. (1977). Principles of management. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  • Thomas, K. W., & Tymon, W. G.Jr. (1982). Necessary properties of relevant research: Lessons from recent criticisms of the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 345–352.
  • Thompson, J. D. (1956). On building an administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1), 102–111. doi: 10.2307/2390842
  • Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Tourish, D. (2013). “Evidence based management”, or “evidence oriented organizing”? A critical realist perspective. Organization, 20(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1177/1350508411435281
  • Tranfield, D. (2002). Formulating the nature of management research. European Management Journal, 20(4), 378–382. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00057-9
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  • Tranfield, D., & Starkey, K. (1998). The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British Journal of Management, 9(4), 341–353. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00103
  • Tsoukas, H. (1994). Introduction: From social engineering to reflective action in organizational behaviour. In H. Tsoukas (Ed.), New thinking in organizational behaviour: From social engineering to reflective action (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Tushman, M. L., O'Reilly, C., Fenollosa, A., Kleinbaum, A. M., & McGrath, D. (2007). Relevance and rigor: Executive education as a lever in shaping practice and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(3), 345–362. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2007.26361625
  • van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x
  • van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 19–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x
  • Van de Ven, A. H. (2000). Professional science for a professional school: Action science and normal science. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 391–446). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Van de Ven, A. H. (2011). Reflections on research for theory and practice: From an engaged scholarship perspective. In S. A. Mohrman & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice (pp. 387–406). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.22527385
  • Vermeulen, F. (2005). On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 978–982. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573102
  • Vermeulen, F. (2007). “I shall not remain insignificant”: Adding a second loop to matter more. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 754–761. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279167
  • Walsh, J. P., Tushman, M. L., Kimberly, J. R., Starbuck, B., & Ashford, S. (2007). On the relationship between research and practice debate and reflections. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(2), 128–154. doi: 10.1177/1056492607302654
  • Webber, A. M., & Peters, T. (2001). Tom Peters's true confessions (interview on the 20th anniversary of In Search of Excellence). Fastcompany 53. Retrieved from http://www.fastcompany.com/44077/tom-peterss-true-confessions
  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Gapping the relevance bridge: Fashions meet fundamentals in management research. British Journal of Management, 12(s1), S71–S75. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.9
  • Weingart, P. (1997). From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: Old wine in new bottles? Social Science Information, 36(4), 591–613. doi: 10.1177/053901897036004002
  • Weingart, P. (1998). Science and the media. Research Policy, 27, 869–879. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00096-1
  • Weiss, C. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Science Communication, 1(3), 381–404. doi: 10.1177/107554708000100303
  • Wensley, R. (1982). PIMS and BCG: New horizons or false dawn? Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 147–158. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250030206
  • Wensley, R. (2007). Beyond rigour and relevance: The underlying nature of both business schools and management research (Advanced Institute of Management Research Working Paper Series). University of Warwick, Warwick Business School.
  • Whitley, R. (1984a). The scientific status of management research as a practically-oriented social science. Journal of Management Studies, 21(4), 369–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00234.x
  • Whitley, R. (1984b). The fragmented state of management studies: Reasons and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 21(3), 331–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00415.x
  • Whitley, R. (1988). The management sciences and managerial skills. Organization Studies, 9(1), 47–68. doi: 10.1177/017084068800900110
  • Whitley, R. (1995). Academic knowledge and work jurisdiction in management. Organization Studies, 16(1), 81–105. doi: 10.1177/017084069501600105
  • Wickert, C., & Schaefer, S. M. (2015). Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations, 68(1), 107–130. doi: 10.1177/0018726713519279
  • Willmott, H. (2012). Reframing relevance as “social usefulness”: A comment on Hodgkinson and Starkey's “Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again”. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 598–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00839.x
  • Wingens, M. (1990). Toward a general utilization theory A systems theory reformulation of the two-communities metaphor. Science Communication, 12(1), 27–42. doi: 10.1177/107554709001200103
  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wolf, J., & Rosenberg, T. (2012). How individual scholars can reduce the rigor-relevance gap in management research. Business Research, 5(2), 178–196. doi: 10.1007/BF03342737
  • Wren, D. A., Halbesleben, J. R., & Buckley, M. R. (2007). The theory–application balance in management pedagogy: A longitudinal update. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(4), 484–492. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2007.27694948
  • Zell, D. (2001). The market-driven business school: Has the pendulum swung too far. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(4), 324–338. doi: 10.1177/1056492601104006
  • Zell, D. (2005). Pressure for relevancy at top-tier business schools. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(3), 271–274. doi: 10.1177/1056492605279097

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.