Connecting the Dots: Bringing External Corporate Governance into the Corporate Governance Puzzle

References

• Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 17–32. doi: 10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B. (2012). Governance and the financial crisis. International Review of Finance, 12(1), 7–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2443.2011.01147.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOS and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1403–1432. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhi030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1331–1355. doi: 10.1002/smj.940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 154–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. (2012). Corporate governance objectives of labor union shareholders: Evidence from proxy voting. Review of Financial Studies, 25(1), 187–226. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhr081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1998). Managerial compensation and the threat of takeover. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(2), 219–239. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00044-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V. (2005). Corporate governance and director accountability: An institutional comparative perspective. British Journal of Management, 16, S39–S53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00446.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415–443. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., & Desender, K. (2012). Methodological challenges in comparative corporate governance and strategic issues. In D. Ketchen, C.L. Wang, & D. Bergh. (Ed.), Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 289–322). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., Goyer, M., & Kabbach-Castro, L. R. (2013). Regulation and comparative corporate governance. In M. Wright, D. S. Siegel, K. Keasey, & I. Filatotchev (Eds.), Handbook of corporate governance (pp. 23–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and international corporate governance. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 485–556. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2010.495525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allee, K. D., & Yohn, T. L. (2009). The demand for financial statements in an unregulated environment: An examination of the production and use of financial statements by privately held small businesses. The Accounting Review, 84(1), 1–25. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, D., & Doyle, J. J. (2011). After midnight: A regression discontinuity design in length of postpartum hospital stays. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1327. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866. doi: 10.1177/0003122410386689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, J., Deakin, S., Lele, P., & Siems, M. (2009). How do legal rules evolve? Evidence from a crosscountry comparison of shareholder, creditor, and worker protection. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(3), 579–629. doi: 10.5131/ajcl.2008.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspara, J., Pajunen, K., Tikkanen, H., & Tainio, R. (2014). Explaining corporate short-termism: Self-reinforcing processes and biases among investors, the media and corporate managers. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 667–693. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwu019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bakker, F. G. A., den Hond, F., King, B. G., & Weber, K. (2013). Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 573–593. doi: 10.1177/0170840613479222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Jayaraman, S., & Shivakumar, L. (2012). Audited financial reporting and voluntary disclosure as complements: A test of the confirmation hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 136–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. M. (2007). Monitoring the monitor: Evaluating CalPERs' activism. Journal of Investing, 16(4), 66–80. doi: 10.3905/joi.2007.698965
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, T., & Child, C. (2011). Movements, markets and fields: The effects of anti-sweatshop campaigns on U.S. firms, 1993–2000. Social Forces, 90(2), 425–451. doi: 10.1093/sf/sor010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2004). Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2005). Pay without performance: Overview of the issues. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(4), 8–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00056.x
   Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., & Hamdani, A. (2009). The elusive quest for global governance standards. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157(5), 1263–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939–961. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhp121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2010). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 3093–3129. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn054.ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, M. K. (2012). Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 131–150. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednar, M. K., Boivie, S., & Prince, N. R. (2013). Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organization Science, 24(3), 910–925. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednar, M. K., Love, E. G., & Kraatz, M. (in press). Paying the price? The impact of controversial governance practices on managerial reputation. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.1091.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, G., Filatotchev, I., & Aguilera, R. V. (2014). Corporate governance and investors' perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 301–320. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J. (2010). Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organization Science, 21(1), 42–62. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111(5), 1043–1075. doi: 10.1086/376950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27(2), 231–273.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., Dong, M., Hirshleifer, D., & Noah, R. (2005). Do tender offers create value? New methods and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), 3–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, M. T., King, T. H. D., & Mauer, D. C. (2004). Bondholder wealth effects in mergers and acquisitions: New evidence from the 1980s and 1990s. The Journal of Finance, 59(1), 107–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizjak, J. M., & Marquette, C. J. (1998). Are shareholder proposals all bark and no bite? Evidence from shareholder resolutions to rescind. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33(4), 499–521. doi: 10.2307/2331129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, D. W., Noland, T. R., & Winters, D. B. (1998). The value of auditor assurance: Evidence from loan pricing. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), 57–70. doi: 10.2307/2491320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, M., & Stout, L. A. (1999). A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247–328. doi: 10.2307/1073662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, M., & Stout, L. A. (2001). Director accountability and the mediating role of the corporate board. Washington Law Review, 79, 403–447.
   Google Scholar
• Blasi, J. R., Freeman, R. B., Mackin, C., & Kruse, D. L. (2010). Creating a bigger pie? The effects of employee ownership, profit sharing, and stock options on workplace performance. In D. L. Kruse, R. B. Freeman, & J. R. Blasi (Eds.), Shared capitalism at work: Employee ownership, profit and gain sharing, and broad-based stock options (pp. 139–165). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bodolica, V., & Spraggon, M. (2009). The implementation of special attributes of CEO compensation contracts around M&A transactions. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 985–1011. doi: 10.1002/smj.779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F., & Thomas, R. (2008). Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1729–1775. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189–220. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(96)00013-2
   Google Scholar
• Brickley, J. A., & James, C. M. (1987). The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure: The case of banking. The Journal of Law and Economics, 30(1), 161–180. doi: 10.1086/467134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bris, A., Brisley, N., & Cabolis, C. (2008). Adopting better corporate governance: Evidence from cross-border mergers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 224–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, F., Chin, M. K., & Hambrick, D. C. (2014). CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1786–1809. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491. doi: 10.2189/asqu.53.3.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart, M., Gromb, D., Mueller, H. M., & Panunzi, F. (2014). Legal investor protection and takeovers. The Journal of Finance, 69(3), 1129–1165. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushee, B. J., Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Hamm, S. J. W. (2010). The role of the business press as an information intermediary. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, J., & Walkling, R. A. (2011). Shareholders' say on pay: Does it create value? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(02), 299–339. doi: 10.1017/S0022109010000803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, A. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1993). Effects of executive departures on the performance of acquired firms. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S1), 137–152. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprio, L., Croci, E., & Del Giudice, A. (2011). Ownership structure, family control, and acquisition decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1636–1657. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capron, L., & Guillén, M. F. (2009). National corporate governance institutions and post-acquisition target reorganization. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 803–833. doi: 10.1002/smj.768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384. doi: 10.1506/CHWK-GMQ0-MLKE-K03V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, H. K., & Wu, D. (2011). Aggregate quasi rents and auditor independence: Evidence from audit firm mergers in China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 175–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Crossland, C. (2014). Can you believe it? Managerial discretion and financial analysts? Responses to management earnings forecasts. In B. Villalonga (Ed.), Finance and strategy (Vol. 31, pp. 103–143). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., & Wong, T. J. (2007). Auditors' governance functions and legal environments: An international investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 13–46. doi: 10.1506/X478-1075-4PW5-1501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. E., & Crawford, E. P. (2012). Influencing climate change policy: The effect of shareholder pressure and firm environmental performance. Business and Society, 51(1), 148–175. doi: 10.1177/0007650311427594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffee, J. C. (1999). Privatization and corporate governance: The lessons from securities market failure. Journal of Corporation Law, 25(1), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. R., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2007). The impact of roles of the board on auditors' risk assessments and program planning decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 91–112. doi: 10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Larcker, D. F. (2008). The power of the pen and executive compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Larcker, D. F. (2003). Executive equity compensation and incentives: A survey. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., & Michelman, J. E. (1993). An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework, case-mix accounting systems and health-care organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(1), 65–80. doi:10.1016/0361–3682(93)90025–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., & Rittenberg, L. (2003). Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: The institutionalization of the global knowledge expert. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 323–355. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00029-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, A. P., & Marcel, J. J. (2011). Damaged goods: Board decisions to dismiss reputationally compromised directors. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 509–527. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 767–789. doi: 10.1002/smj.610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797–819. doi: 10.1002/smj.913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuñat, V., Gine, M., & Guadalupe, M. (2012). The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. The Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1943–1977. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuñat, V., Gine, M., & Guadalupe, M. (2013). Say pays! Shareholder voice and firm performance (ECGI Finance Working Paper, 373). Brussels: European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI).
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Rajagopalan, N. (2003). Governance through ownership: Centuries of practice, decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 151–158. doi: 10.2307/30040611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daines, R. M., Gow, I. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2010). Rating the ratings: How good are commercial governance ratings? Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), 439–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Roengpitya, R. (2003). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 13–26. doi: 10.2307/30040673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 1–64. doi: 10.1080/078559806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583–613. doi: 10.2307/2393275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F. (2005). New directions in corporate governance. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 143–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F. (2013). After the corporation. Politics & Society, 41(2), 283–308. doi:10.1177/0032329213483110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1086/231170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F., & Stout, S. K. (1992). Organization theory and the market for corporate control: A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets, 1980–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 605–633. doi: 10.2307/2393474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. (1994). A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 141–173. doi: 10.2307/2393497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, “low balling”, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90009-4
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Guercio, D., & Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(3), 293–340. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00011-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Guercio, D., Seery, L., & Woidtke, T. (2008). Do boards pay attention when institutional investor activists “just vote no”? Journal of Financial Economics, 90(1), 84–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209–233. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, D. K., & McConnell, J. J. (2003). International corporate governance. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36. doi: 10.2307/4126762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desender, K., Aguilera, R. V., Crespi, R., & Garcia-cestona, M. (2013). When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 823–842. doi: 10.1002/smj.2046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desender, K., Aguilera, R. V., López-Puertas Lamy, M., & Crespi, R. (in press). A clash of governance logics: Foreign ownership and board monitoring. Strategic Management Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Dharmapala, D. (2008). What problems and opportunities are created by tax havens? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(4), 661–679. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grn031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopuch, N., & Simunic, D. (1982). Competition in auditing: An assessment. In Fourth symposium on auditing research (pp. 401–450). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, A., Volchkova, N., & Zingales, L. (2008). The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1093–1135. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2002). The corporate governance role of the media. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95(6), 1401–1440. doi: 10.1086/229459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1531–1576. doi: 10.1086/229939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. B., & Suchman, M. C. (1997). The legal environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 479–515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Muslu, V. (2011). Shareholder activism and CEO pay. Review of Financial Studies, 24(2), 535–592. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhq113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Stubben, S. R. (2010). Board of directors' responsiveness to shareholders: Evidence from shareholder proposals. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(1), 53–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach, R., & Stulz, R. M. (2011). Bank CEO incentives and the credit crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faleye, O. (2004). Cash and corporate control. The Journal of Finance, 59(5), 2041–2060. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325. doi: 10.1086/467037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri, F., & Sandino, T. (2009). The impact of shareholder activism on financial reporting and compensation: The case of employee stock options expensing. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 433–466. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I. (2008). Developing an organizational theory of corporate governance: Comments on Henry L. Tosi, Jr. (2008) “Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research”. Journal of Management & Governance, 12(2), 171–178. doi: 10.1007/s10997-008-9055-8
   Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I., & Boyd, B. K. (2009). Taking stock of corporate governance research while looking to the future. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 257–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00748.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finegold, D., Benson, G. S., & Hecht, D. (2007). Corporate boards and company performance: Review of research in light of recent reforms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 865–878. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. New York, NY: West.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 501–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & Choo, J. (2005). Law and corporate governance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1(1), 61–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, C. F., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Greenstein, J., & Zwick, E. (2014). Opting out of good governance. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w19953.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17–34. doi: 10.2308/aud.1999.18.2.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2002). Expanded disclosures and the increased usefulness of earnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 515–546. doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, K., Netter, J., & Stegemoller, M. (2002). What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1763–1793. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Castro, R., & Aguilera, R. V. (2015). Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 137–147. doi: 10.1002/smj.2241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Castro, R., Aguilera, R. V., & Ariño, M. A. (2013). Bundles of firm corporate governance practices: A fuzzy set analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(4), 390–407. doi: 10.1111/corg.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00058-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2007). The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2007.00125.x
   Google Scholar
• Giroud, X., & Mueller, H. M. (2011). Corporate governance, product market competition, and equity prices. The Journal of Finance, 66(2), 563–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01642.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156. doi: 10.1162/00335530360535162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2010). Extreme governance: An analysis of dual-class firms in the United States. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 1051–1088. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhp024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. C., Hebb, T., & Hoepner, A. (2014). Shareholder dialogue behind the scenes: Addressing the bulk of the iceberg. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1). Retrieved from http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2014/1/17084.short
   Google Scholar
• Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. V. (2014). Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1230–1268. doi: 10.1177/0149206313515519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, V. K., & Park, C. W. (2002). Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00028-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Schor, M. (2009). Investor activism and takeovers. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(3), 362–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, T., Doh, J., & Sinclair, G. (2004). Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 125–139. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033112.11461.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, R.-J., Kruse, T. A., & Nohel, T. (2008). Undoing the powerful anti-takeover force of staggered boards. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 274–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469–502. doi: 10.1177/0149206308330554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. J., & Murphy, K. J. (2003). The trouble with stock options. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 49–70. doi: 10.1257/089533003769204353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. v., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3), 381–385. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2001). The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89(2), 439–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2004). What is corporate law? In R. Kraakman, J. Armour, P. Davies, L. Enriques, H. B. Hansmann, G. Hertig, … , E. B. Rock (Eds.), The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harford, J. (2003). Takeover bids and target directors' incentives: The impact of a bid on directors' wealth and board seats. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 51–83. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00108-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Bromiley, P. (2007). Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science, 18(3), 350–367. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A., Rao, H., & Paruchuri, S. (2007). The winds of change: The progressive movement and the bureaucratization of thrift. American Sociological Review, 72(1), 117–142. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, J. P., & Williams, A. T. (2000). The rise of fiduciary capitalism: How institutional investors can make corporate America more democratic. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191. doi: 10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, M. L. A., & Boeker, W. (1998). Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 1–22. doi: 10.2307/2393589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, M. L. A., Rindova, V. P., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Believing one's own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 637–653. doi: 10.1002/smj.405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 3–26. doi: 10.1257/089533003765888403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. doi: 10.1177/0149206309343469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. M. (1986). From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 800–837. doi: 10.1086/228351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O. K., Langli, J. C., & Thomas, W. B. (2012). Agency conflicts and auditing in private firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), 500–517. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O. K., Thomas, W., & Vyas, D. (2011). Financial credibility, ownership, and financing constraints in private firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(7), 935–957. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 697–716. doi: 10.2307/3069305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance the role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2012.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, J. C., & Lennox, C. S. (2002). The large audit firm fee premium: A case of selectivity bias? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(1), 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., Lambert, R. A., & Larcker, D. F. (2003). The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1–3), 89–127. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00088-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (1984). Takeovers: Folklore and science. Harvard Business Review, 62(6), 109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joe, J. R. (2003). Why press coverage of a client influences the audit opinion. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 109–133. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joe, J. R., Louis, H., & Robinson, D. (2009). Managers' and investors' responses to media exposure of board ineffectiveness. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(3), 579–605. doi: 10.1017/S0022109009990044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 409–438. doi: 10.1177/014920639602200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2005). The influence of the financial press on stockholder wealth: The case of corporate governance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 461–471. doi: 10.1002/smj.457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. A., Moorman, T. C., & Sorescu, S. (2009). A reexamination of corporate governance and equity prices. Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4753–4786. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhp018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, W. Q., Gaur, A., & Muller-Kahle, M. I. (2010). Antecedents of shareholder activism in target firms: Evidence from a multi-country study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 258–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karceski, J., Ongena, S., & Smith, D. C. (2005). The impact of bank consolidation on commercial borrower welfare. The Journal of Finance, 60(4), 2043–2082. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00787.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, V. (2009). Corporate governance ratings: One score, two scores, or more. University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, 158, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. B., Chung, R., & Firth, M. (2003). Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 323–359. doi: 10.1506/J29K-MRUA-0APP-YJ6V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395–421. doi: 10.2189/asqu.53.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. G., & Pearce, N. A. (2010). The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 249–267. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007). Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 413–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187–200. doi: 10.1002/smj.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2009). Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 187–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2011). The impact of hedge fund activism on the target firm's existing bondholders. Review of Financial Studies, 24(5), 1735–1771. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhr016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2012). Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 304–315. doi: 10.1177/1476127012453108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnik, R. D. (1990). Effects of board demography and directors' incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 129–150. doi: 10.2307/256355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H. B., Hertig, G., … Rock, E. B. (2004). The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, J. A., & Hegarty, W. H. (2001). Predicting who stays and leaves after an acquisition: A study of top managers in multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 185–196. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<185::AID-SMJ149>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. doi: 10.1086/250042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 3–27. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking agency theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 294–314. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.48463335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., McCall, A. L., & Ormazabal, G. (2013). Outsourcing shareholder voting to proxy advisory firms (Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper, 119). Palo Alto, CA: Rock Center for Corporate Governance, Stanford Graduate School of Business.
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., McCall, A. L., Ormazabal, G., & Tayan, B. (2012). Ten myths of “say on pay” (Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Closer Look Series: Topics, Issues and Controversies in Corporate Governance No. CGRP-26). Palo Alto, CA: Rock Center for Corporate Governance, Stanford Graduate School of Business.
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Domesticating radical rant and rage: An exploration of the consequences of environmental shareholder resolutions on corporate environmental performance. Business and Society, 50(1), 155–188. doi: 10.1177/0007650310394640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. S., & Pittman, J. A. (2010). Big five audits and accounting fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(1), 209–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. S., & Pittman, J. A. (2011). Voluntary audits versus mandatory audits. The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1655–1678. doi: 10.2308/accr-10098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., & McConnell, J. J. (2013). The role of the media in corporate governance: Do the media influence managers' capital allocation decisions? Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logsdon, J. M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2008). Justice and large corporations: What do activist shareholders want? Business and Society, 47(4), 523–548. doi: 10.1177/0007650308316524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpj017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. M., Sundaramurthy, C., & Mahoney, J. T. (1997). The effects of corporate antitakeover provisions on long-term investment: Empirical evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(5), 349–365. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199708)18:5<349::AID-MDE835>3.0.CO;2-P
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, J. J., & Cowen, A. P. (2014). Cleaning house or jumping ship? Understanding board upheaval following financial fraud. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 926–937. doi: 10.1002/smj.2126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martynova, M., & Renneboog, L. (2008). Spillover of corporate governance standards in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 200–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi: 10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2013). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595–612. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGahan, A. M. (2014). Opening governance: Theme for the 75th annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Retrieved from http://aom.org/annualmeeting/
   Google Scholar
• Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163–184. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(94)00809-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. doi: 10.2307/256809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. S. (2006). The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5), 1001–1033. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00224.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2005). Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring – firm returns in the recent merger wave. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 757–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00745.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(0), 293–315. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., & Quack, S. (2010). Laws as governing institution. In G. Morgan, J. Campbell, C. Crouch, R. Whitley, & O. K. Petersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (pp. 275–308). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. (2005). Cultural adaptation and institutional change: The evolution of vocabularies of corporate governance, 1972–2003. Poetics, 33(3–4), 163–178. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Rourke, A. (2003). A new politics of engagement: Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(4), 227–239. doi: 10.1002/bse.364
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, N. (2000). The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 32(4), 397–414. doi: 10.1006/bare.2000.0139
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1–41. doi: 10.1162/00335530360535135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642. doi: 10.2307/30040654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevost, A. K., & Rao, R. P. (2000). Of what value are shareholder proposals sponsored by public pension funds? The Journal of Business, 73(2), 177–204. doi: 10.1086/209639
   Google Scholar
• Proffitt, W. T., & Spicer, A. (2006). Shaping the shareholder activism agenda: Institutional investors and global social issues. Strategic Organization, 4(2), 165–190. doi: 10.1177/1476127006064067
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2000). The governance of the new enterprise (No. w7958). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rediker, K. J., & Seth, A. (1995). Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 85–99. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250160202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeb, D., Sakakibara, M., & Mahmood, I. P. (2012). From the editors: Endogeneity in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 211–218. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business and Society, 43(3), 239–267. doi: 10.1177/0007650304266869
   Google Scholar
• Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2011). The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(1), 167–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 50–71. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.19379624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, M. J. (1994). Strong managers, weak owners: The political roots of American corporate finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, R. (1993). Public pension fund activism in corporate governance reconsidered. Columbia Law Review, 93, 795–853. doi: 10.2307/1122989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneper, W. D., & Guillén, M. F. (2004). Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 263–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, K. B., & Soo, B. S. (1996). The association between auditor changes and reporting lags. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 353–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00505.x
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. In A. Auerbach (Ed.), Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences (pp. 33–68). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. doi: 10.2307/2490397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöström, E. (2008). Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: What do we know? Sustainable Development, 16(3), 141–154. doi: 10.1002/sd.361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. P. (1996). Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERs. The Journal of Finance, 51, 227–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05208.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. M., Steensma, K. H., Harrison, D. A., & Cochran, P. L. (2005). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives' decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 181–195. doi: 10.1002/smj.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaramurthy, C. (2000). Antitakeover provisions and shareholder value implications: A review and a contingency framework. Journal of Management, 26(5), 1005–1030. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. S., & Cotter, J. F. (2007). Shareholder proposals in the new millennium: Shareholder support, board response, and market reaction. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2–3), 368–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200006)21:6<689::AID-SMJ115>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tihanyi, L., Graffin, S. D., & George, G. (2014). Rethinking governance in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1535–1543. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.4006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirole, J. (2001). Corporate governance. Econometrica, 69(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tkac, P. (2006). One proxy at a time: Pursuing social change through shareholder proposals. Economic Review, 91(3), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tosi, H. (2008). Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research. Journal of Management & Governance, 12(2), 153–169. doi: 10.1007/s10997-008-9054-9
   Google Scholar
• Tosi, H., Werner, S., Katz, J., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26(2), 301–339. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, C., & O'Sullivan, N. (2007). The impact of acquisitions on firm performance: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(2), 141–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlenbruck, K., Hitt, M. A., & Semadeni, M. (2006). Market value effects of acquisitions involving internet firms: A resource-based analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 899–913. doi: 10.1002/smj.546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2004). Tracing the American roots of the political consumerism movement. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (Eds.), Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 83–100). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, J. B., Porac, J. F., Pollock, T. G., & Graffin, S. D. (2006). The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 643–660. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913. doi: 10.1002/smj.1952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J. L., & Hoffman, A. J. (2013). Exceptional boards: Environmental experience and positive deviance from institutional norms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 253–271. doi: 10.1002/job.1813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J. L., & Triandis, H. (2014). Universal truths: Can universally held cultural values inform the modern corporation? Cross Cultural Management, 21(3), 345–356. doi: 10.1108/CCM-12-2013-0186
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 421–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A. J., Brown, J. A., & Rodriguez, D. (2009). Governance bundles, firm performance, and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 646–660. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00766.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn, M., & Bromiley, P. (2014). Managers and analysts: An examination of mutual influence. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 849–868. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. (2005). Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms' strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 262–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Clement, M. B. (2008). Sociopolitical dynamics in relations between top managers and security analysts: Favor rendering, reciprocity, and analyst stock recommendations. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 873–897. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Deephouse, D. L. (2011). Avoiding bad press: Interpersonal influence in relations between CEOS and journalists and the consequences for press reporting about firms and their leadership. Organization Science, 22(4), 1061–1086. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Graebner, M. E. (2010). A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 15–44. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48036721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. M. (1997). Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 366–394. doi: 10.2307/2393924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., Park, S. H., McDonald, M. L., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2012). Helping other CEOs avoid bad press social exchange and impression management support among CEOs in communications with journalists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2), 217–268. doi: 10.1177/0001839212453267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1998). The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 127–153. doi: 10.2307/2393593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2013). A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 607–661. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.783669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersema, M. F., & Zhang, Y. (2011). CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1161–1182. doi: 10.1002/smj.932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Wurthmann, K. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2008). The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 231–251. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2008.27752771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1970). Corporate control and business behavior: An inquiry into the effects of organization form on enterprise behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, J., & Singh, H. (2011). How do acquirers retain successful target CEOS? The role of governance. Management Science, 57(12), 2101–2114. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, L. Q., Rao, H., & Ingram, P. (2013). Information spillovers from protests against corporations: A tale of Walmart and target. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(4), 669–701. doi: 10.1177/0001839213511243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (2004). The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. American Sociological Review, 69, 433–457. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, D. H. (2013). Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 800–822. doi: 10.1002/smj.2039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingales, L. (1998). Corporate governance. In P. Newman (Ed.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law (Vol. 1, pp. 497–503). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438. doi: 10.1086/210178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar