Conceptualizing Emergent States: A Strategy to Advance the Study of Group Dynamics

References

• Ablowitz, R. (1939). The theory of emergence. Philosophy of Science, 6(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1086/286529
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 423–438. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriani, P. & McKelvey, B. (2009). Perspective—From Gaussian to Paretian thinking: Causes and implications of power laws in organizations. Organization Science, 20, 1053–1071. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bedau, M. A. (2008). Downward causation and autonomy in weak emergence. In M. Bedau & P. Humphreys (Eds.), Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science (pp. 155–188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bedau, M. A., & Humphreys, P. (2008). Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresman, H., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2013). The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organization Science, 24(4), 1120–1139. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. D., & Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 607–649. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.003135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234. doi: 10.2307/20159921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998a). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998b). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 421–483. doi: 10.1177/109442819814004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Kanfer, R., DeShon, R. P., Mathieu, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2009). The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of cross-level model of motivation in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, C. A. (2006). Seeking the comparative advantage: The dynamics of individual cooperation in single vs. multiple team environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 145–159. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, C. A., & Schnackenberg, A. (2012). Complex system methods for studying multiteam systems. In S. Zaccaro, M. Marks, & L. DeChurch (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments (pp. 453–479). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corning, P. (2002). The emergence of “emergence”: Now what? Emergence, 4(3), 54–71. doi: 10.1207/S15327000EM0403-05
   Google Scholar
• Coultas, C. W., Driskell, T., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2014). A conceptual review of emergent state measurement current problems, future solutions. Small Group Research, 45(6), 671–703. doi: 10.1177/1046496414552285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571–612. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., Kenis, P., Raab, J., & Brandes, U. (2010). Composing effective teams through team dating. Organization Studies, 31(7), 873–894. doi: 10.1177/0170840610373195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., & Schruijer, S. G. (2010). Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(1), 66–79. doi: 10.1037/a0017104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2014). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management, 20(10), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. doi: 10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmeche, C., Køppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F. (1997). Explaining emergence: Towards ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28(1), 83–117. doi: 10.1023/A:1008216127933
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 604–617. doi: 10.1037/a0014367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, L. (2010). How do IT capabilities create strategic value? Toward greater integration of insights from reductionistic and holistic approaches. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 16–33. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2010.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–193. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.762225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldspink, C., & Kay, R. (2010). Emergence in organizations: The reflexive turn. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 12(3), 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1, 49–72. doi: 10.1207/s15327000em0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. (2013). Re-imagining emergence: Part 1. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 15(2), 78–104.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. A., & Endres, A. M. (2012). The anatomy of emergence, with a focus upon capital formation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 352–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E. C., & Wallendorf, M. R. (1982). Free response and card-sort techniques for assessing cognitive content: Two studies concerning their stability, validity, and utility. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 1095–1110. doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.54.3c.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2000). The concept of emergence in social science: Its history and importance. Emergence, 2(4), 65–77. doi: 10.1207/S15327000EM0204_08
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, D. T., Clermont, G., Sexton, J. B., Karlo, C. A., Miller, R. G., Weissfeld, L. A., Rowan, K.M., & Angus, D. C. (2007). Perceptions of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution. Critical Care Medicine, 35, 165–176. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251505.76026.CF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2014.904140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. doi: 10.2307/2393638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. doi: 10.2307/3069453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. (2010). The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 596–616. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, C. F. (2013). An ecosystem approach to sustainable agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175–192. doi: 10.2307/20159571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klep, A., Wisse, B., & Van der Flier, H. (2011). Interactive affective sharing versus non-interactive affective sharing in work groups: Comparative effects of group affect on work group performance and dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 312–323. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., & Chao, G. T. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5–6), 335–354. doi: 10.1002/mde.2552
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 581–615. doi: 10.1177/1094428113493119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236. doi: 10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Langfred, C. W. (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 885–900. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, B. B. (2014). Generative emergence: A new discipline of organizational, entrepreneurial and social innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lissack, M. R., & Letiche, H. (2002). Complexity, emergence, resilience, and coherence: Gaining perspective on organizations and their study. Emergence, 4, 72–94. doi: 10.1207/S15327000EM0403-06
   Google Scholar
• Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims Jr., H. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 573–596. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97–108. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 37–56. doi: 10.1002/job.296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B. P. (2008). The rise and fall of British emergentism. In M. Bedau & P. Humphreys (Eds.), Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science (pp. 19–59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mell, J., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. (2014). The catalyst effect: The impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1154–1173. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., Parker, V., Giles, M., Joyce, P., & Chiang, V. (2014). Transformation through tension: The moderating impact of negative affect on transformational leadership in teams. Human Relations, 67(9), 1095–1121. doi: 10.1177/0018726714521645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi: 10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G. A., & Richardson, H. A. (2007). Group conflict as an emergent state: Temporal issues in the conceptualization and measurement of disagreement. In K. J. Behfar & L. L. Thompson (Eds.), Conflict in organizational groups: New directions in theory and practice (pp. 145–179). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, T. A., & Allen, N. J. (2012). Team meeting attitudes: Conceptualization and investigation of a new construct. Small Group Research, 43(2), 186–210. doi: 10.1177/1046496411426485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta, C. F., Lopes, P. N., Gilson, L. L., Lourenço, P. R., & Pais, L. (2015). Innovation processes and team effectiveness: The role of goal clarity and commitment, and team affective tone. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 80–107. doi: 10.1111/joop.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. O., Gogus, C. I., & Yu, R. C. F. (2011). Does backing up behavior explain the efficacy–performance relationship in teams? Small Group Research, 42(4), 458–474. doi: 10.1177/1046496410390964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentsch, J. R., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. In M. M. Beyerlein & D. A. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams (Vol. 1, pp. 223–261). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Randall, K. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2014). Information elaboration and team performance: Examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Reinforcing the micro/macro bridge: Organizational thinking and pluralistic vehicles. Journal of Management, 37, 429–442. doi: 10.1177/0149206310372414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C. M., & Passos, A. M. (2013). Team mental models, relationship conflict and effectiveness over time. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 19(7/8), 363–385. doi: 10.1108/TPM-01-2013-0003
   Google Scholar
• Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods and applications. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Proximities, networks, and schemata. In R. W. Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 135–148). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, Y., & Choi, J. N. (2010). What makes a group of good citizens? The role of perceived group-level fit and critical psychological states in organizational teams. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 531–552. doi: 10.1348/096317909X440233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 17–27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533. doi: 10.2307/1412188
   Google Scholar
• Waller, M. J., Conte, J. M., Gibson, C. B., & Carpenter, M. A. (2001). The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review, 26, 586–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, E. J. (2010). Riot in Alexandria: Tradition and group dynamics in late antique pagan and Christian communities. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L. Q., & Wu, L. (2013). What a diverse top management team means: Testing an integrated model. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 389–412. doi: 10.1111/joms.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, S., Albert, S., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Time scales and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 725–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Maloney, M. M., Bhappu, A. D., & Salvador, R. B. (2008). When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar