1,924
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Diverging and Converging: Integrative Insights on a Paradox Meta-perspective

, , , , , & show all

References

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
  • Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1–21. doi: 10.2307/2391741
  • Capra, F. (2010). The tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and eastern mysticism. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.
  • Chung, C. C., & Beamish, P. W. (2010). The trap of continual ownership change in international equity joint ventures. Organization Science, 21(5), 995–1015. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0489
  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. doi: 10.1108/09534811111132758
  • Ford, J., & Backoff, R. (1988). Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 81–121). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21(3), 593–608. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0485
  • Hatch, M. J. (1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of a management team. Organization Science, 8(3), 275–288. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.3.275
  • Hatch, M. J., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1993). Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(4), 505–526. doi: 10.1177/017084069301400403
  • Huxham, C., & Beech, N. (2003). Contrary prescriptions: Recognizing good practice tensions in management. Organization Studies, 24(1), 69–93. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024001678
  • Huy, Q. N. (2002). The emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 31–69. doi: 10.2307/3094890
  • Iedema, R., Degeling, P., Braithwaite, J., & White, L. (2004). “It’s an interesting conversation I’m hearing”: The doctor as manager. Organization Studies, 25(1), 15–33. doi: 10.1177/0170840604038174
  • Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250141009
  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.
  • Lüscher, L., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767217
  • March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  • McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P., (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 10, 1–16.
  • Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.006
  • Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. doi: 10.1177/0170840609349875
  • Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2002). Managing discursive tension: The co-existence of individualist and collaborative discourses in flight centre. Journal of Management Studies, 39(8), 1045–1069. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00323
  • Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578.
  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. G. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1). doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
  • Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316058
  • Raisch, S., & Tushman, M. (in press). Growing new corporate businesses: From initiation to graduation. Organization Science.
  • Schad, J., Lewis, M., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1). doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422
  • Sheep, M. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Khazanchi, S. (in press). Knots in the discourse of innovation: Investigating multiple tensions in a reacquired spin-off. Organization Studies.
  • Smith, K., & Berg, D. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Smith, W. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0932
  • Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
  • Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
  • Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.