Effects of a New Artificial Reef Complex on Red Snapper and the Associated Fish Community: an Evaluation Using a Before–After Control–Impact Approach

REFERENCES

• Addis, D. T., W. F. Patterson III, and M. A. Dance. 2016. The potential for unreported artificial reefs to serve as refuges from fishing mortality for reef fishes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 36:131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Addis, D. T., W. F. Patterson III, M. A. Dance, and G. W. Ingram Jr. 2013. Implications of reef fish movement from unreported artificial reef sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Research 147:349–358.
   Google Scholar
• Alevizon, W. S., and J. C. Gorham. 1989. Effects of artificial reef deployment on nearby resident fishes. Bulletin of Marine Science 44:646–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allman, R. J., G. R. Fitzhugh, K. J. Starzinger, and R. A. Farsky. 2005. Precision of age estimation in Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus). Fisheries Research 73:123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allman, R. J., L. A. Lombardi-Carlson, G. R. Fitzhugh, and W. A. Fable. 2002. Age structure of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the Gulf of Mexico by fishing mode and region. Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 53:482–495.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, H. K., J. H. Cowan Jr., and R. L. Shipp. 2001. Experimental evaluation of potential effects of habitat size and presence of conspecifics on habitat association by young-of-the-year Red Snapper. Gulf of Mexico Science 19:119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Baine, M. 2001. Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance. Ocean and Coastal Management 44:241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baine, M., and J. Side. 2003. Habitat modification and manipulation as a management tool. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13:187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M. W., K. L. Heck Jr., K. W. Able, D. L. Childers, D. B. Eggleston, B. M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C. G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T. J. Minello, R. J. Orth, P. F. Sheridan, and M. P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51:633–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, J. A. 1989. Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioral preference? Bulletin of Marine Science 44:631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, J. A., D. E. Harper, D. B. McClellan, and M. Hulsbeck. 1994. Effects of reef size on colonization and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs off southeastern Florida, USA. Bulletin of Marine Science 55:796–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, J. A., D. L. Johnson, and R. F. Ambrose. 1991. Ecology of artificial reef habitats and fishes. Pages 61–107 in W. Seaman Jr. and L. M. Sprague, editors. Artificial habitats for marine and freshwater fisheries. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, J. A., and D. L. Sutherland. 1985. Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science 37:11–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, E., and C. E. Bryan. 1975. Life history and fishery of the Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico 1970–1974. Proceedings of the Annual Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 27:77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, J. R., and D. C. Jackson. 2013. Influences of artificial reefs on juvenile Red Snapper along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 5:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickhill, M. J., S. Y. Lee, and R. M. Connolly. 2005. Fish associated with artificial reefs: attributing changes to attraction or production using novel approaches. Journal of Fish Biology 67:53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, K. 2012. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries science review of artificial reefs. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-12-05, Silver Spring, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M. H., and M. A. Hixon. 1997. Artificial reefs: the importance of comparisons with natural reefs. Fisheries 22(4):28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenci, E., M. Pizzolon, N. Chimento, and C. Mazzoldi. 2011. The influence of a new artificial structure on fish assemblages of adjacent hard substrata. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 91:133–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, S. D., and G. P. Jones. 1991. The influence of habitat complexity on postrecruitment processes in a temperate reef population. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 151:271–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufrene, T. A. 2005. Geological variability and Holocene sedimentary record on the northern Gulf of Mexico inner to mid-continental shelf. Master’s thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2015. ArcGIS 10.3.1 for desktop. ESRI, Redlands, California.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, T. K., and W. J. Lindberg. 1994. Refuge spacing similarly affects reef associated species from three phyla. Bulletin of Marine Science 55:388–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich, C. Y. M., and R. J. Kline. 2015. Using fish population metrics to compare the effects of artificial reef density. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 10(9):e0139444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaway, B. J., and J. G. Cole. 1999. Reduction of juvenile Red Snapper bycatch in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:342–355.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaway, B. J., J. G. Cole, R. Meyer, and P. Roscigno. 1999. Delineation of essential habitat for juvenile Red Snapper in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:713–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaway, B. J., S. T. Szedlmayer, and W. J. Gazey. 2009. A life history review for Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico with an evaluation of the importance of offshore petroleum platforms and other artificial reefs. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17:48–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, C. P. 1995. Red Snapper in U.S. waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Stock Assessment Report MIA-95/96-05, Miami.
   Google Scholar
• Gregalis, K. C., L. S. Schlenker, J. M. Drymon, J. F. Mareska, and S. P. Powers. 2012. Evaluating the performance of vertical longlines to survey reef fish populations in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:1453–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. D., G. P. Jones, and W. J. Seaman. 1997. Do artificial reefs increase regional fish production? A review of existing data. Fisheries 2(4):17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Q. A., M. M. Reese Robillard, J. A. Williams, M. J. Ajemian, and G. W. Stunz. 2016. Reopening of a remote tidal inlet increases recruitment of estuarine-dependent nekton. Estuaries and Coasts 39:1769–1784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixon, M. A., and J. P. Beets. 1993. Predation, prey refugees, and the structure of coral-reef fish assemblages. Ecological Monographs 63:77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoese, H. D., and R. H. Moore. 1998. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico: Texas, Louisiana, and adjacent waters, 2nd edition. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, S. A., and C. R. Arnold. 1982. Growth of juvenile Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus, in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 80:644–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jearld, A. Jr. 1983. Age determination. Pages 301–324 in L. A. Nielsen and D. L. Johnson, editors. Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. J., and A. G. Pulsipher. 2005. Rigs-to-reef programs in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Development and International Law 36:119–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulaw, D. H., J. H. Cowan Jr., and M. W. Jackson. 2017. Temporal and spatial comparisons of the reproductive biology of northern Gulf of Mexico (USA) Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) collected a decade apart. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 12 (3):e0172360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, W. J., T. K. Frazer, K. M. Portier, F. Vose, J. Loftin, D. J. Murie, D. M. Mason, B. Nagy, and M. K. Hart. 2006. Density-dependent habitat selection and performance by a large mobile reef fish. Ecological Applications 16:731–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, W. J., T. K. Frazer, and G. R. Stanton. 1990. Population effects of refuge dispersion for adult stone crabs (Xanthidae, Menippe). Marine Ecology Progress Series 66:239–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, M. S., D. M. Schroeder, W. Lenarz, A. MacCall, A. S. Bull, and L. Thorsteinson. 2006. Potential use of offshore marine structures in rebuilding an overfished rockfish species, Bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis). U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 104:383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCawley, J. R., and J. H. Cowan Jr. 2007. Seasonal and size specific diet and prey demand of Red Snapper on Alabama artificial reefs. Pages 77–104 in W. F. Patterson III, J. H. Cowan Jr., G. R. Fitzhugh, and D. L. Nieland, editors. Red Snapper ecology and fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 60, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Minton, R. V., and S. R. Heath. 1998. Alabama’s artificial reef program: building oases in the desert. Gulf of Mexico Science 1:105–106.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. N. 1966. Biology of the Red Snapper, Lutjanus aya Bloch, of the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Publications of the Institute of Marine Science 11:90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mudrak, P. A., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2012. Proximity effects of larger resident fishes on recruitment of age-0 Red Snapper in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, J. C., R. A. Brown, and N. Salesky. 1973. Grazing by the echinoid Diadema antillarum Phillipi: formation of halos around West Indian patch reefs. Science 182:715–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzts, A. C., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2003. Diel feeding patterns of Red Snapper on artificial reefs in the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:1186–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. O. Jr., D. R. Colby, and T. D. Willis. 1983. Estimated amount of reef habitat on a portion of the U.S. South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico continental shelf. Bulletin of Marine Science 33:935–940.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. H., J. H. Grabowski, and S. P. Powers. 2003. Estimated enhancement of fish production resulting from restoring oyster reef habitat: quantitative valuation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 264:249–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, H., and D. Whitmarsh. 1997. Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research 31:39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar, and R Core Team. 2017. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. ( September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available: http://www.R-project.org/. (August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Reese, M. M., G. W. Stunz, and A. M. Bushon. 2008. Recruitment of estuarine-dependent nekton through a new tidal inlet: the opening of Packery Channel in Corpus Christi, TX, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 31:1143–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezak, R., T. J. Bright, and D. W. McGrail. 1985. Reefs and Banks of the northwestern Gulf of Mexico: their geological, biological and physical dynamics. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rooker, J. R., A. M. Landry Jr., B. W. Geary, and J. A. Harper. 2004. Assessment of a shell bank and associated substrates as nursery habitat of postsettlement Red Snapper. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 59:653–661.
   Google Scholar
• Sale, P. 1991. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, W. S. Jr. 2000. Artificial reef evaluation with application to natural marine habitats. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• SEAMAP (Southeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program). 2013. SEAMAP vertical line survey protocol, version 1.7. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean Springs, Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• SEDAR (Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review). 2013. SEDAR 31 Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper stock assessment report. SEDAR, North Charleston, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• SEDAR (Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review). 2015. SEDAR 43 stock assessment report Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish. SEDAR, North Charleston, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Shideler, G. L. 1981. Development of the benthic nepheloid layer on the South Texas Continental Shelf, western Gulf of Mexico. Marine Geology 41:37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, C. M., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2011. Recruitment of age-0 Gray Triggerfish to benthic structured habitat in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140:14–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, C. M., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2012. Territoriality, reproductive behavior, and parental care in Gray Triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 88:197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Oaten, A., W. W. Murdoch, and K. R. Parker. 1986. Environmental impact assessment: “pseudoreplication” in time? Ecology 67:929–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelcheck, A. J., J. H. Cowan Jr., and A. Shah. 2005. Influence of reef location on artificial-reef fish assemblages in the northcentral Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 77:425–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syc, T. S., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2012. A comparison of size and age of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with the age of artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 110:458–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szedlmayer, S. T., and J. D. Lee. 2004. Diet shifts of juvenile Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with changes in habitat and fish size. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 102:366–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, A. J. 1994. On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications 4:3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderKooy, S. 2009. A practical handbook for determining the ages of Gulf of Mexico fishes. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Publication 167, Ocean Springs, Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Vose, F. E., and W. G. Nelson. 1994. Gray Triggerfish (Balistes capriscus Gmelin) feeding from artificial and natural substrate in shallow Atlantic waters of Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 55:1316–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wege, G. W., and R. O. Anderson. 1978. Relative weight (Wr): a new index of condition for Largemouth Bass Pages 79–91 in G. D. Novinger and J. G. Dillard, editors. New approaches to the management of small impoundments. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 5, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, R. J. D., K. M. Boswell, J. H. Cowan Jr., and W. F. Patterson III. 2008a. Size selectivity of sampling gears targeting Red Snapper in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Research 89: 294–299.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, R. J. D., J. H. Cowan Jr., and B. Fry. 2008b. Feeding ecology of Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 361:213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, R. J. D., J. H. Cowan Jr., W. F. Patterson III, and C. J. Walters. 2008c. Effect of trawling on juvenile Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) habitat selection and life history parameters. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:2399–2411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, I., A. Shah, D. Foster, and B. Hataway. 2002. Habitat preferences and site fidelity of juvenile Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus). ICES Journal of Marine Science 59:S43–S50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar