Framing climate futures: the media representations of climate and energy policies in Finnish broadcasting company news

References

• Aalberg T. 2017. Does public media enhance citizen knowledge? Shifting through the evidence, in: the death of public knowledge? London: Goldsmiths - MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abson DJ, Fischer J, Leventon J, Newig J, Schomerus T, Vilsmaier U, von Wehrden H, Abernethy P, Ives CD, Jager NW, et al. 2017. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio. 46(1):30–22. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne AG. 2016. Climate change communication: what can we learn from communication theory? WIREs climate change. 7:329–344. doi:10.1002/wcc.392.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff M. 2011. Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of mass media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511978586
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff MT, Roberts T. 2007. Media coverage of climate change: current trends, strengths, weaknesses. human development report office (HDRO). United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann M, Lörcher I, Walter S. 2020. Post-normal science communication: exploring the blurring boundaries of science and journalism. J Sci Commun. 19. doi:10.22323/2.19030202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchs M, Koch M. 2019. Challenges for the degrowth transition: the debate about wellbeing. Futures. 105:155–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Iyengar S. 2016. The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. null. 19:7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Google Scholar
• Cann HW, Raymond L. 2018 . Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative frames in opposition to climate policy. Environmental Politics. 27:433–454. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1439353.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick AE. 2017. Climate Change Communication. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.22
   Google Scholar
• Dator J. 2009. Alternative futures at the Manoa School. J. Futures Stud. 14:2.
   Google Scholar
• Dator J. 2014. “New beginnings” within a new normal for the four futures. Foresight. 16:496–511. doi:10.1108/FS-09-2013-0046
   Google Scholar
• Davis A. 2019. Political communication: a new introduction for crisis times. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Death C. 2022. Climate Fiction, Climate Theory: decolonising imaginations of global futures. Millennium. 50:430–455. doi:10.1177/03058298211063926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehler-Holland J, Schumacher K, Fichtner W. 2021. Topic Modeling Uncovers Shifts in Media Framing of the German Renewable Energy Act. Patterns. 2(1):100169. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eide E, Kunelius R. 2020. Climate reporting: challenges and opportunities, in: research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer F, Forester J (Eds.), 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822381815
   Google Scholar
• Freedman D. 2018. Populism and media policy failure. Eur. J. Commun. 33:604–618. doi:10.1177/0267323118790156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ. Innov. Soc Transitions. 1(1):24–40.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience., frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge (MA, US): Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granjou C, Walker J, Salazar JF. 2017. The politics of anticipation: on knowing and governing environmental futures. Futures. 92:5–11. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin DC, Mancini P. 2004. Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics, communication, society and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511790867.
   Google Scholar
• Harjuniemi T. 2021. The power of primary definers: how journalists assess the pluralism of economic journalism. Journalism 14648849211035300. doi:10.1177/14648849211035299
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopmann DN, Elmelund-Præstekær C, Albæk E, Vliegenthart R, Vreese de CH. 2012. Party media agenda-setting: how parties influence election news coverage. Party Politics. 18:173–191. doi:10.1177/1354068810380097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2021. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. contribution of working group i to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009157896. [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds.)].
   Google Scholar
• Kekkonen S, Raunio T. 2011. Towards stronger political steering: program management reform in the Finnish government. In: . : Dahlström C, Peters BG, Pierre J, editors. Steering from the Centre : Strengthening Political Control in Western democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 241–260. doi:10.3138/9781442687066-013
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa P, Mickwitz P. 2011. Public policy as a part of transforming energy systems: framing bioenergy in Finnish energy policy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 19:1812–1821. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortenkamp K, Basten B. 2015. Environmental science in the media: effects of opposing viewpoints on risk and uncertainty perceptions. Sci Commun. 37(3):287–313. doi:10.1177/2F1075547015574016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff G. 2010. Why it matters how we frame the environment. null. 4:70–81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749
   Google Scholar
• Loiseau E, Saikku L, Antikainen R, Droste N, Hansjürgens B, Pitkänen K, Leskinen P, Kuikman P, Thomsen M. 2016. Green economy and related concepts: an overview. J. Clean. Prod. 139:361–371. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J. 2007. Temporalities and environmental reporting: press news on eutrophication in Finland. Environ Sci J Integr Environ Res. 4(1):41–51. doi:10.1080/15693430701295866.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J. 2011. Mainstreaming climate policy: the role of media coverage in Finland. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 16:649–661. doi:10.1007/s11027-011-9286-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Kangas H-L, Mervaala E, Vikström S, 2020. Muted by a crisis? COVID-19 and the long-term evolution of climate change newspaper coverage. Sustainability 12. 10.3390/su12208575
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara JR. 2005. Media content analysis: its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal. 6:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment. 2017. Government report on medium-term climate change plan for 2030 – towards climate-smart day-to-day living. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Moser SC. 2016. Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say? WIREs climate change. 7:345–369. doi:10.1002/wcc.403.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy PD. 2021. Speaking for the youth, speaking for the planet: Greta Thunberg and the representational politics of eco-celebrity. Popular Commun. 19(3):193–206. doi:10.1080/15405702.2021.1913493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf KA, Kumar A. 2016. Content analysis, in: the international encyclopedia of political communication. American Cancer Society. 1–10. doi:10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc065
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nisbet MC. 2009. Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. null. 51:12–23. doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
   Google Scholar
• Paloheimo H. 2003. The Rising Power of the Prime Minister in Finland. Scandinavian Pol Stud. 26:219–243. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson AR, Tsai CG, Clayton S. 2021. Ethics, morality, and the psychology of climate justice. Current Opin Psychol. 42:36–42. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. 2015. Finland, a land of solutions. In: Strategic programme of prime minister Juha Sipilä’s government. Helsinki, Finland: Prime Minister’s Office. p. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. 2016. Government report on the national energy and climate strategy for 2030. Helsnki, Finland: Prime Minister’s Office.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. 2018. Eight parties in parliament decide on common climate policy goals. Helsinki, Finland: Prime Minister’s Office.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. 2019. Inclusive and competent Finland – a socially, economically and ecologically sustainable society. In: Programme of Prime minister Antti rinne’s government. Helsinki, Finland: Prime Minister’s Office. p. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. 2020. Fair transition towards carbon neutral Finland - roadmap for achieving the carbon neutrality goal. Helsinki, Finland: Prime Minister’s Office.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2022. Reuters Institute digital news report 2022. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. .
   Google Scholar
• Risbey JS. 2008. The new climate discourse: alarmist or alarming? Global Environ Change. 18:26–37. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachsman DB, Valenti JM. Eds. 2020. Routledge handbook of environmental journalism. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer MS, O’Neill S, Nisbet M, Ho S, Markowitz E, Thaker J. 2017. Frame analysis in climate change communication: approaches for assessing journalist’ minds, online communication and media portrayals. In: Ho, Shirley, Markowitz, Ezra, O'Neill, Saffron, Nisbet, Matthew, Jagadish, Thaker, Schäfer, Mike S, editors. Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer MS, Painter J. 2020. Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world. WIREs Climate Change. 12(1):e675. doi:10.1002/wcc.675.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte S, Vasileiadou E, Petersen AC. 2013. Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: how newspaper frames are changing. J Integr Environ Sci. 10(1):1–16. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2012.759593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm P. 2020. The green economy transition: the challenges of technological change for sustainability. Sustain Earth. 3:6. doi:10.1186/s42055-020-00029-y
   Google Scholar
• Stecula DA, Merkley E. 2019. Framing climate change: economics, ideology, and uncertainty in American news media content from 1988 to 2014. Frontiers in Commun. 4. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard I, Anderson K, Capstick S, Carton W, Depledge J, Facer K, Gough C, Hache F, Hoolohan C, Hultman M, et al. 2021. Three decades of climate mitigation: why haven’t we bent the global emissions curve? Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 46:653–689. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supran G, Oreskes N. 2021. Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate change communications. One Earth. 4(5):696–719. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014.
   Google Scholar
• Temple M. 2018. The Rise and Fall of the British Press. 1st. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Tiili M. 2008. Ministers as strategic political leaders? Strategic political steering after NPM reforms in Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila T, Vesa J, Eranti V, Kukkonen A, Lehtimäki T, Lonkila M, Luhtakallio E. 2018. Up with ecology, down with economy? The consolidation of the idea of climate change mitigation in the global public sphere. Eur J Commun. 33:587–603. doi:10.1177/0267323118790155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yle, 2020. Yle’s strategy: for all of us, for each of us. Yle 2020 May 19.
   Google Scholar
• Yle, 2021. Yle’s year 2020. [accessed 2020 May 19]. https://yle.fi/aihe/s/10000907
   Google Scholar