Individual-Based Model use in Marine Policy

References

• Akerlof K. 2022. Beyond the sheltering academic silo: norms for scientists’ participation in policy. In: Progress in molecular biology and translational science. Vol. 188, Elsevier; pp. 29–21. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.007.
   Google Scholar
• Akerlof K, Lemos M, Cloyd E, Heath E, Nelson S, Hathaway J, Timm K (2018, August 6). Barriers in communicating science for policy in Congress. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, 2018 Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Béland D, Howlett M. 2016. The Role and Impact of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis. Jour of Compa Poli Analy: Resea and Prac. 18(3):221–227. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce E, Gershenson C. 2015. Modelling complexity for policy: opportunities and challenges. In: Geyer R, Cairney P, editors. Handbook on complexity and public policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; pp. 190–204.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney P, Oliver K. 2017. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Res Policy Sys. 15(1):15. https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cartwright SJ, Bowgen KM, Collop C, Hyder K, Nabe-Nielsen J, Stafford R, Stillman RA, Thorpe RB, Sibly RM. 2016. Communicating complex ecological models to non-scientist end users. Ecol Modell. 338:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case Studies. (n.d). Bournemouth University Individual Ecology. [accessed March 30, 2023]. https://www.individualecology.com/case-studies/
   Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100(14):8086–8091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang M, Thellufsen JZ, Zakeri B, Pickering B, Pfenninger S, Lund H, Østergaard PA. 2021. Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition. Appl Energ. 290:116731. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childress MJ (2014, October 15). Going with the flow: forecasting the impact of climate change on blue crabs. Proceedings of the 2014South Carolina Water Resources Conference Proceedings of the 2014 South Carolina Water Resources Conference. https://core.ac.uk/display/268629091?utm_source=pdf&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=pdf-decoration-v1
   Google Scholar
• Cockrell M, Dubickas K, Hepner M, Ilich A, McCarthy M. 2018. Embracing Advocacy in Science. Fisheries. 43(4):179–182. doi: 10.1002/fsh.10055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codling EA. 2008. Individual-based movement behaviour in a simple marine reserve—fishery system: why predictive models should be handled with care. Hydrobiologia. 606(1):55–61. doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9345-9.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger D, Thulke H-H, Selhorst T, Müller T. 2005. Emergency vaccination of rabies under limited resources – combating or containing? BMC Infect Dis. 5(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein G, Bennett A, Gruby R, Acton L, Nenadovic M. 2014. Studying power with the Social-ecological system framework. In: Manfredo MJ, Vaske JJ, Rechkemmer A Duke EA, editors. Understanding society and natural resources: forging new strands of integration across the social sciences. Springer Netherlands; pp. 111–135. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8959-2_6.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and FisheriesFiorentino F, Calleja D, Colloca F, Perez M, Prato G, Russo T, Sabatella R, Scarcella G, Solidoro C, Vrgoč N. 2020. Marine protected areas: network(s) for enhancement of sustainable fisheries in EU Mediterranean waters: mANTIS : marine protected areas network towards sustainable fisheries in the Central Mediterranean. Publications Office. doi: 10.2771/33931.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Davis AL. 2014. Communicating scientific uncertainty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111(supplement_4):13664–13671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317504111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller RA, Lee JR, Watson JEM. 2014. Achieving open access to conservation science. Conserv Biol. 28(6):1550–1557. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Asorey MI, Escati-Peñaloza G, Parma AM, Pascual MA, Marshall C. 2011. Conflicting objectives in trophy trout recreational fisheries: evaluating trade-offs using an individual-based model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 68(11):1892. doi: 10.1139/f2011-108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gojovic MZ, Sander B, Fisman D, Krahn MD, Bauch CT. 2009. Modelling mitigation strategies for pandemic (H1N1) 2009. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J. 181(10):673–680. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon HS. 1954. The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ. 62(2):124–142. doi: 10.1086/257497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm V, Berger U, Bastiansen F, Eliassen S, Ginot V, Giske J, Goss-Custard J, Grand T, Heinz SK, Huse G, et al. 2006. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol Modell. 198(1):115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm V, Johnston AS, Thulke H, Forbes VE, Thorbek P. 2020. Three questions to ask before using model outputs for decision support. Nat Commun. 11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17785-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm V, Railsback S. 2005. Introduction. In: Individual-based modeling and ecology. STU-Student. Princeton University Press; JSTOR; pp. 3–21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhnk8.5
   Google Scholar
• Hall AJ, McConnell BJ, Rowles TK, Aguilar A, Borrell A, Schwacke L, Reijnders PJH, Wells RS. 2006. Individual-based model framework to assess population consequences of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure in Bottlenose Dolphins. Environ Health Perspect. 114(Suppl 1):60–64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8053.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hare M, Deadman P. 2004. Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management. Mathe and Compin Simul. 64(1):25–40. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4754(03)00118-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes A, Slater M, Snyder L. 2008. The SAGE Sourcebook of Advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Sage Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781452272054.
   Google Scholar
• Holland D. 2010. Management strategy evaluation and management procedures: tools for rebuilding and sustaining fisheries (OECD food, agriculture and fisheries papers 25; OECD food. Agric Fish Papers. 25. doi: 10.1787/5kmd77jhvkjf-en.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2022. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama, eds. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009325844. In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MN, Jørgensen SE, Eds. 2017. Environmental management of marine ecosystems. CRC Press. doi: 10.4324/9781315153933.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan IC, Gaichas SK, Stawitz CC, Lynch PD, Marshall KN, Deroba JJ, Masi M, Brodziak JKT, Aydin KY, Holsman K, et al. 2021. Management strategy evaluation: allowing the light on the hill to illuminate more than One species. Front Mar Sci. 8:624355. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.624355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler L, Lowther J. 2022. Policy making for sharks and the role and contribution of non-governmental organisations in the fulfilment of international legal obligations. Mar Policy. 144:105228. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkman DA, Campo P, Balke-Visser T, Gilbert N. 2016. How to build models for government: criteria driving model acceptance in policymaking. Policy Sci. 49(4):489–504. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9250-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Kalafatis SE, Scavia D, Rood RB. 2014. Moving climate information off the shelf: boundary chains and the role of RISAs as adaptive organizations. Weather, Climate, And Soc. 6(2):273–285. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00044.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig F, Johansson E, Davidsson P. 2021. Agent-based Social simulation of the Covid-19 Pandemic: a systematic review. J Art Soc Social Simul. 24(3):5. doi: 10.18564/jasss.4601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marine science (Ninth Report of Session 2012–13). 2013. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmsctech/727/727.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation: UK initial assessment and proposals for Good Environmental Status. 2012, December. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/marine-strategy-framework-directive-consultation-uk-initial-assessment-and-proposals-for-good-environmental-status
   Google Scholar
• McBryde ES, Meehan MT, Adegboye OA, Adekunle AI, Caldwell JM, Pak A, Rojas DP, Williams BM, Trauer JM. 2020. Role of modelling in COVID-19 policy development. Paediatr Respir Rev. 35:57–60. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell A, Hart P. 2019. Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’. Policy Sci. 52(4):645–661. doi: 10.1007/s11077-019-09362-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcintosh B, Giupponi C, Voinov A, Smith C, Matthews K, Monticino M, Kolkman M, Crossman N, van Ittersum M, Haase D, et al. 2008. Bridging the gaps between design and use: developing tools to support Environmental management and policy. U S Environ Protect Agency Papers. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usepapapers/71.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JL, Frumhoff PC, Hamburg SP, de la Rosa C. 2010. Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 8(6):299–305. doi: 10.1890/090143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mika AM, Newman JA. 2010. Climate change scenarios and models yield conflicting predictions about the future risk of an invasive species in North America. Agric For Entomol. 12(3):213–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2009.00464.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne GJ, Kelso JK, Kelly HA, Huband ST, McVernon J, Montgomery JM. 2008. A small community model for the transmission of infectious diseases: comparison of school closure as an Intervention in Individual-based models of an influenza Pandemic. PloS One. 3(12):e4005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORPH. n.d. Bournemouth University Individual Ecology. [accessed March 30, 2023] https://www.individualecology.com/morph/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson MP, Vucetich JA. 2009. On advocacy by Environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how. Conserv Biol. 23(5):1090–1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01250.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz M, Jordán F. 2021. Marine coastal ecosystems modelling and conservation: latin american experiences. 1st ed. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58211-1.
   Google Scholar
• Paolisso M, Trombley J, Hood RR, Sellner KG. 2015. Environmental models and public stakeholders in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Estuar Coast. 38(1):97–113. doi: 10.1007/s12237-013-9650-z.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin AS, Knight TM. 2003. Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. J Nat Conserv. 11(2):83–90. doi: 10.1078/1617-1381-00040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullin AS, Knight TM. 2005. Assessing conservation management’s evidence base: a survey of management-plan Compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia. Conserv Biol. 19(6):1989–1996. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00287.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railsback S, Ayllón D, Harvey BC. 2021. InSTREAM 7: instream flow assessment and management model for stream trout. River Res Apps. 37(9):1294–1302. doi: 10.1002/rra.3845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railsback S, Grimm V. 2011. Agent-based and Individual-based modeling: a practical Introduction. Princton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Railsback S, Grimm V (2019). Agent-Based And Individual-Based Modeling (2nd ed.). https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691190822/agent-based-and-individual-based-modeling
   Google Scholar
• Railsback SF, Harvey BC. 2002. Analysis of Habitat-Selection Rules Using an Individual-Based Model. Ecology. 83(7):1817. doi: 10.2307/3071767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railsback S, Harvey B, Jackson S, Lamberson R. 2009. InSTREAM: The Individual-Based Stream Trout Research and Environmental Assessment Model. InSTREAM: The Individual-Based Stream Trout Research and Environmental Assessment Model. doi: 10.2737/PSW-GTR-218.
   Google Scholar
• Rose D. 2015. The case for policy-relevant conservation science. Conserv Biol. 29(3):748–754. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose N, Parsons ECM. 2015. “Back off, man, I’m a scientist!” when marine conservation science meets policy. Ocean Coast Manag. 115:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squazzoni F, Boero R. 2010. Complexity-friendly policy modelling. In: Ahrweiler P, editor. Innovation in Complex Social Systems, edited by Petra Ahrweiler. New York: Routledge; pp. 290–299.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis KA, McBride TD, Brownson RC. 2010. Communicating prevention messages to policy makers: the role of stories in promoting physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 7(1):S99–107. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.s1.s99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steel B, List P, Lach D, Shindler B. 2004. The role of scientists in the environmental policy process: a case study from the American west. Environ Science & Policy. 7(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2003.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhay E, Cloyd ET (2018, December 10). Incentives, Opportunities, and Success? AAAS Members’ Experiences Communicating with Policymakers. AGU Fall Meeting 2018. https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm18/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/394004
   Google Scholar
• Süsser D, Ceglarz A, Gaschnig H, Stavrakas V, Flamos A, Giannakidis G, Lilliestam J. 2021. Model-based policymaking or policy-based modelling? How energy models and energy policy interact. Energy Res Social Sci. 75:101984. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syme G, Bennett D, Macpherson D, Thomas J. 2011 December 12. Guidelines for policy modellers – 30 years on: new tricks or old dogs? In: Chan F, Marinova D Anderssen R S, editors. MODSIM2011, 19th international congress on modelling and simulation. 10.36334/modsim.2011.G6.syme
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill JL (2014). Bridging the Gap between Research and Decision-Making: Empirical Evidence from a Case Study of Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Management in the U.S. [Ph.D., George Mason University]. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1556432405/abstract/28C4434EE9FB4EFFPQ/1
   Google Scholar
• Tuinstra W. 2022. Air pollution, science, policy, and international negotiations. Oxford Res Encyclop Environ Sci. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.730.
   Google Scholar
• Tuinstra W, Hordijk L, Mol APJ, Hisschemoeller M, Berk M (2002). Climate Options for the Long Term (COOL). Synthesis Report. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/20309687
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout E, Stuiver M, Klostermann J, Harms B, Leeuwis C. 2013. New roles of science in society: different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Sci Public Policy. 40(3):354–365. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny J, Radaelli CM, Jordan A, Jacob K. 2009. The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging Trends and New directions. J Eur Public Policy. 16(4):640–653. doi: 10.1080/13501760902872783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchmański J, Grimm V. 1996. Individual-based modelling in ecology: what makes the difference? Trends Ecol Evol. 11(10):437–441. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)20091-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner S. 2011. How information literacy becomes policy: an analysis using the multiple streams framework. Libr Trends. 60(2):297–311. doi: 10.1353/lib.2011.0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm‐Rechmann A, Cowling RM. 2011. Framing biodiversity conservation for decision makers: insights from four South African municipalities. Conserv Lett. 4(1):73–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00149.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Lacy RC, Ashe E, Hall A, Lehoux C, Lesage V, McQuinn I, Plourde S (2017). Predicting Responses Of St. Lawrence Beluga To Environmental Change And Anthropogenic Threats To Orient Effective Management Actions. Fisheries and Oceans Canada: Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. https://waves-vagues.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Library/40605772.pdf
   Google Scholar