Rapid mapping of seismic intensity assessment using ground motion data calculated from early aftershocks selected by GIS spatial analysis

References

• Atkinson GM, Wald DJ. 2007. “Did You Feel It?” intensity data: a surprisingly good measure of earthquake ground motion. Seismol Res Lett. 78(3):362–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wang D, Si H, Zhang C. 2022b. Rapid estimation of seismic intensities using a new algorithm that incorporates array technologies and ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Bull Seismol Soc Am. 112(3):1647–1661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wang D, Zhang C, Yao Q, Si H. 2022a. Estimating seismic intensity maps of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Madoi, Qinghai and Mw 6.1 Yangbi, Yunnan, China earthquakes. J Earth Sci. 33:839–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. 1988. Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc. 83(403):596–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 74(368):829–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS. 1981. LOWESS: a program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. Am Stat. 35(1):54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua F, Gamba P. 2012. Remote sensing and earthquake damage assessment: experiences, limits, and perspectives. Proc IEEE. 100(10):2876–2890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Wu Z, Song K. 2017. SeismOlympics. Seismol Res Lett. 88(6):1429–1430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felzer KR, Brodsky EE. 2006. Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress. Nat Commun. 441(7094):735–738.
   Google Scholar
• Fornasari SF, Pazzi V, Costa G. 2022. A machine-learning approach for the reconstruction of ground-shaking fields in real time. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 112(5):2642–2652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García D, Mah R, Johnson K, Hearne M, Marano K, Lin K, Wald D, Worden C, So E. 2012. ShakeMap Atlas 2.0: An improved suite of recent historical earthquake ShakeMaps for global hazard analyses and loss model calibration. Proceedings of the World conference on earthquake engineering; Lisbon, Portugal: WCEE.
   Google Scholar
• Han B, Liu Z, Chen B, Li Z, Yu C, Zhang Y, Peng J. 2022. Coseismic deformation and slip distribution of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.6 earthquake revealed by InSAR observations. Geomat Inf Sci Wuhan Univ. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20220636
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour V, Saeidi A, Nollet M-J, Nastev M. 2021. Seismic loss estimation software: a comprehensive review of risk assessment steps, software development and limitations. Eng Struct. 232:111866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough SE, Martin SS. 2021. Which earthquake accounts matter? Seismol Res Lett. 92(2A):1069–1084.
   Google Scholar
• Hough SE, Martin SS. 2022. Reply to “Comment on ‘Which Earthquake Accounts Matter?’ by Susan E. Hough and Stacey S. Martin” by David J. Wald. Seismol Res Lett. 93(1):506–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao P, Alavi AH. 2020. Artificial intelligence in seismology: advent, performance and future trends. Geosci Front. 11(3):739–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Z, Fialko Y. 2021. Coseismic and early postseismic deformation due to the 2021 M7. 4 Maduo (China) earthquake. Geophys Res Lett. 48(21):e2021GL095213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilb D, Gomberg J, Bodin P. 2000. Triggering of earthquake aftershocks by dynamic stresses. Nature. 408(6812):570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisslinger C. 1996. Aftershocks and fault-zone properties. Adv Geophys. 38:1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei J, Gao M, Yu Y. 2007. Seismic motion attenuation relations in Sichuan and adjacent areas (in Chinese). Acta Seismol Sin. 20(5):532–543.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani M, Basu K. 2014. Local regression type methods applied to the study of geophysics and high frequency financial data. Physica A. 410:609–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi SM, Ellsworth WL, Zhu W, Chuang LY, Beroza GC. 2020. Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking. Nat Commun. 11(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neo JC, Huang Y, Yao D, Wei S. 2021. Is the aftershock zone area a good proxy for the mainshock rupture area? Bull Seismol Soc Am. 111(1):424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie G, An J, Deng Y. 2012. Advance in earthquake emergency disaster service (in Chinese). Seismol Geol. 34(04):782–791.
   Google Scholar
• Nie G, An J. 2013. Basic theoretical model of earthquake emergency response (in Chinese). Urban Disaster Reduct. 3:25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Okada Y, Kasahara K, Hori S, Obara K, Sekiguchi S, Fujiwara H, Yamamoto A. 2004. Recent progress of seismic observation networks in Japan—Hi-net, F-net, K-NET and KiK-net. Earth Planet Sp. 56(8):xv–xxviii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otake R, Kurima J, Goto H, Sawada S. 2020. Deep learning model for spatial interpolation of real‐time seismic intensity. Seismol Res Lett. 91(6):3433–3443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozawa S, Ando R. 2021. Mainshock and aftershock sequence simulation in geometrically complex fault zones. J Geophys Res: solid Earth. 126(2):e2020JB020865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng C, Jiang P, Ma Q, Wu P, Su J, Zheng Y, Yang J. 2021. Performance evaluation of an earthquake early warning system in the 2019–2020 M 6.0 Changning, Sichuan, China, Seismic Sequence. Front Earth Sci. 9:699941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plank S. 2014. Rapid damage assessment by means of multi-temporal SAR—A comprehensive review and outlook to Sentinel-1. Remote Sens. 6(6):4870–4906.
   Google Scholar
• Poggi V, Scaini C, Moratto L, Peressi G, Comelli P, Bragato PL, Parolai S. 2021. Rapid damage scenario assessment for earthquake emergency management. Seismol Res Lett. 92(4):2513–2530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcari M, Montuori A, Bignami C, Moro M, Stramondo S, Tolomei C. 2017. Using multi-band InSAR data for detecting local deformation phenomena induced by the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. Remote Sens Environ. 201:234–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShakeMap Atlas 2.0 World conference on earthquake engineering. 2012. An improved suite of recent historical earthquake ShakeMaps for global hazard analyses and loss model calibration.
   Google Scholar
• Shebalin P, Narteau C. 2017. Depth dependent stress revealed by aftershocks. Nat Commun. 8(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Si H, Midorikawa S. 1999. New attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and velocity considering effects of fault type and site condition. Transactions of AIJ. 64(523):63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wald DJ, Worden BC, Quitoriano V, Pankow KL. 2006. ShakeMap® manual. Technical manual, users guide, software guide version.
   Google Scholar
• Wald DJ. 2022. Comment on “which earthquake accounts matter?” by Susan E. Hough and Stacey S. Martin. Seismol Res Lett. 93(1):500–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Mori J. 2011. Frequency‐dependent energy radiation and fault coupling for the 2010 Mw8. 8 Maule, Chile, and 2011 Mw9. 0 Tohoku, Japan, earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett. 38(22):L22308.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Ni S, Li J. 2013. Research statues of rapid assessment on seismic intensity (in Chinese). Progress in Geophys. 28(04):1772–1784.
   Google Scholar
• Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ. 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 84(4):974–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden CB, Thompson EM, Hearne M, Wald DJ. 2020. ShakeMap manual online: technical manual, user’s guide, and software guide. US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7D21VPQ
   Google Scholar
• Xia C, Nie G, Fan X, Zhou J, Pang X. 2019. Research on the application of mobile phone location signal data in earthquake emergency work: a case study of Jiuzhaigou earthquake. PLoS One. 14(4):e0215361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, An J, Nie G. 2016. A quick earthquake disaster loss assessment method supported by dasymetric data for emergency response in China. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 16(3):885–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Zhou H, Nie G, An J. 2020. Plotting earthquake emergency maps based on audience theory. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 47:101554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan L, Liu Y, Liao S, Pang Y, Tang L, Fang L. 2022. Analysis and research of the real-time automatic detecting results for the Sichuan Maerkang earthquakes sequence on 10 June, 2022 (in Chinese). China Earthquake Eng J. 44(06):1450–1458.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Wang D, Guo R, Xie M, Zang Y, Wang Y, Yao Q, Cheng C, An Y, Zhang Y. 2022. Rapid report of the 8 January 2022 MS 6.9 Menyuan earthquake, Qinghai, China. Earthquake Res Adv. 2(1):100113.
   Google Scholar
• Yin XZ, Chen JH, Peng Z, Meng X, Liu QY, Guo B, Li SC. 2018. Evolution and distribution of the early aftershocks following the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 123(9):7775–7790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Li T, Su P, Sun H, Ha G, Guo P, Chen G, Thompson Jobe J. 2022. Large surface‐rupture gaps and low surface fault slip of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo earthquake along a low‐activity strike‐slip fault, Tibetan Plateau. Geophys Res Lett. 49(6):e2021GL096874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukutake Y, Iio YJE. 2017. Why do aftershocks occur? Relationship between mainshock rupture and aftershock sequence based on highly resolved hypocenter and focal mechanism distributions. Earth Planets Space. 69(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Chen W, Zhang C, Kang D. 2022b. Rapid estimation of seismic intensities by analysing early aftershock sequences using the robust locally weighted regression program (Lowess). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discuss. [preprint] https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2022-228 (in review).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao H, He S, Chen W, Si H, Yin X, Zhang C. 2022a. A rapid evaluation method of earthquake intensity based on the aftershock sequence: a case study of Menyuan M6. 9 earthquake in Qinghai Province. China Earthq Eng J. 44(02):432–439.
   Google Scholar