Seismic hazard analysis of Silchar city located in North East India

References

• Ahmed R, Singh RP. 2016. Attenuation relation predicted observed ground motion of Gorkha Nepal earthquake of April 25, 2015. Nat Haz. 80:311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aman A, Singh UK, Singh RP. 1995. A new empirical relation for strong seismic ground motion for the Himalayan region. Current Sci. 69(9):772–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan P, Kumar A, Sitharam TG. 2013. Ground Motion prediction equation considering combined dataset of recorded and simulated sound motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 53:92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahuguna A, Sil A. 2018. Comprehensive seismicity, seismic sources and seismic hazard assessment of Assam, North East India. J Earthq Eng. 24(2):254–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj K, Anbazhagan P. 2019. Regional stochastic GMPE with available recorded data for active region – application to the Himalayan region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 126:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baro O, Kumar A, Zadeh AI. 2020. Seismic hazard assessment of the Shillong Plateau using a probabilistic approach. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 11(1):2210–2238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das R, Sharma ML, Wason HR. 2016. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Northeast India region. Pure App Geophysics. 173:2653–2670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Gupta ID, Gupta VK. 2002. A new attenuation model for North-East India. 12th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, IIT Roorkee, India.
   Google Scholar
• Devi A, Sarbeswar K. 2014. Seismic hazard analysis of Northeast India and its adjoining region. Int J Environ Sci. 4(5):859–874.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner JK, Knopoff L. 1974. Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seis Soc America. 64(5):1363–1367.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta ID. 2002. The state of art in sesimic hazard analysis. Indian Soc Earthq Tech. 39(4):311–346.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta ID. 2010. Response spectral attenuation relations for in-slab earthquakes in Indo- Burmese subduction zone. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 30(5):368–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta PK, Ghosh G, Kumar V, Paramasivam P, Dhanasekaran S. 2022. Effectiveness of LRB in curved bridge isolation: a numerical study. Appl Sci. 12(21):11289.
   Google Scholar
• Gutenberg B, Richter CF. 1945. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Nature. 156(3960):371–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haloi J, Sil A. 2015. Seismic Site Classification of a Bridge Site over River Barak on Silchar Bypass Road. Int J Adv Earth Sci Eng. 4(1), :275–282.
   Google Scholar
• IS 1893:2016. 2016. Part 1: general provisions and buildings, criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Mohan K, Patel R. 2007. A deterministic approach for preparation of seismic hazard maps in North East India. Nat Haz. 43(1):129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanno T, Narita A, Morikawa N, Fujiwara H, Fukushima Y. 2006. A New Attenuation Relation for Strong Ground Motion in Japan Based on Recorded Data. Bull Seis Soc America. 96(3):879–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijko A, Sellevoll MA. 1989. Estimation of Earthquake Hazard Parameters from Incomplete Data Files. Part I. Utilization of Extreme and Complete Catalogs with Different Threshold Magnitudes. Bull Seis Soc America. 79(3):645–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijko A. 2004. Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, Mmax. Pure Appl Geophysics. 161:1655–1681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer SL. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall international series in civil Engineering and Engineering mechanics.
   Google Scholar
• Lin PS, Lee CT. 2008. Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in Northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seis Soc America. 98(1):220–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon A, Ornthammarath T, Corigliano M, Lai CG. 2010. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Macrozonation of Tamil Nadu in Southern India. Bull Seis Soc India. 100(3):1320–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller C, Boyd OS, Petersen MD, Moschetti MP, Rezaeian S, Shumway A. 2015. Seismic hazard in the eastern United States. Earthq Spec. 31(S1):85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS, Maiti SK, Nayak A. 2012. Ground-motion predictions in Shillong Region, northeast India. J Seismo. 16:475–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath SK, Thingbaijam K. 2012. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of India. Seismo Res Letters. 83(1):135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA). 2011. Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Raghu Kanth ST, Iyengar RN. 2007. Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in peninsular India. J Ear Sys Sci. 116(3):199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghu Kanth STG, Iyengar RN. 2006. Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai City. Curr. Sci. 91(11):1486–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghu Kanth STG, Singh KD, Pallav K. 2009. Deterministic seismic scenarios for Imphal City. Pure Appl Geophysics. 166(4):641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghukanth STG, Kavitha B. 2014. Ground motion relations for active regions in India. Pure Appl. Geophy. 171(9):2241–2275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Malik S. 2006. “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Estimation of Spectral Strong Ground Motion”. 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma ML, Douglas J, Bungum H, Kotadia J. 2011. Ground-motion prediction equations based on data from the Himalayan and Zagros regions. J Earthq Eng. 13(8):1191–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayanfar M, Jahani E. 2015. New fuzzy method in choosing Ground Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Struc. 10(2):389–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sil A, Sitharam TG, Kolathaya S. 2013. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Tripura and Mizoram States. Nat Haz. 68:1089–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RP, Aman A, Prasad YJ. 1996. Attenuation, relations for strong ground motion in the Himalayan region. Pure Appl Geophys. 147(1):161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitharam TG, Sil A. 2014. Comprehensive seismic hazard assessment of Tripura and Mizoram states. J Earth Sys Sci. 123:837–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma M, Bansal BK. 2013. Seismic hazard assessment and mitigation in India: an overview. Int. J. Earth Sci. 102(5):1203–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D, Coppersmith K. 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seis Soc America. 84(4):974–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humphrey JR. 1997. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett. 68(1):58–73.
   Google Scholar