Combination four different ensemble algorithms with the generalized linear model (GLM) for predicting forest fire susceptibility

References

• Abdo HG, Almohamad H, Al Dughairi AA, Al-Mutiry M. 2022. GIS-based frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process for forest fire susceptibility mapping in the western region of Syria. Sustainability. 14(8):4668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedi Gheshlaghi H,Feizizadeh B,Blaschke T,Lakes T,Tajbar S. 2021. Forest fire susceptibility modeling using hybrid approaches. Trans GIS. 25(1):311–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abram NJ,Henley BJ,Sen Gupta A,Lippmann TJR,Clarke H,Dowdy AJ,Sharples JJ,Nolan RH,Zhang T,Wooster MJ, et al. 2021. Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia. Commun Earth Environ. 2(1).
   Google Scholar
• Achu AL, Thomas J, Aju CD, Gopinath G, Kumar S, Reghunath R. 2021. Machine-learning modelling of fire susceptibility in a forest-agriculture mosaic landscape of southern India. Ecol Inf. 64:101348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adab H,Kanniah KD,Solaimani K. 2013. Modeling forest fire risk in the northeast of Iran using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Nat Hazards. 65(3):1723–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranat V, Perminov V. 2020. Mathematical modeling of wildland fire initiation and spread. Environ Model Softw. 125:104640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi K,Kalantar B,Saeidi V,Harandi EKG,Janizadeh S,Ueda N. 2020. Comparison of machine learning methods for mapping the stand characteristics of temperate forests using multi-spectral sentinel-2 data. Remote Sens. 12(18):3019.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed MR, Hassan QK, Abdollahi M, Gupta A. 2020. Processing of near real time land surface temperature and its application in forecasting forest fire danger conditions. Sensors. 20(4):984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akıncı HA, Akıncı H. 2023. Machine learning based forest fire susceptibility assessment of Manavgat district (Antalya), Turkey. Earth Sci Inform. 16(1):397–414.
   Google Scholar
• Alin A. 2010. Multicollinearity. WIREs Comp Stat. 2(3):370–374.
   Google Scholar
• Ardabili S, Mosavi A, Dehghani M, Várkonyi-Kóczy AR. 2019. Deep learning and machine learning in hydrological processes climate change and earth systems a systematic review. In International conference on global research and education. Cham: Springer; p. 52–62.
   Google Scholar
• Band SS, Janizadeh S, Saha S, Mukherjee K, Bozchaloei SK, Cerdà A, Shokri M, Mosavi A. 2020. Evaluating the efficiency of different regression, decision tree, and bayesian machine learning algorithms in spatial piping erosion susceptibility using ALOS/PALSAR Data. Land. 9(10):346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera B, Shit PK, Sengupta N, Saha S, Bhattacharjee S. 2022. Forest fire susceptibility prediction using machine learning models with resampling algorithms, Northern part of Eastern Ghat Mountain range (India). Geocarto Int. 37(26):11756–11781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera B, Shit PK, Sengupta N, Saha S, Bhattacharjee S. 2022. Susceptibility of deforestation hotspots in Terai-Dooars belt of Himalayan Foothills: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS models. J King Saud Univ–Comput Inform Sci. 34(10):8794–8806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand F, Meyer N, Bertrand MF. 2014. Package ‘plsRglm.
   Google Scholar
• Bou-Hamad I, Anouze AL, Larocque D. 2017. An integrated approach of data envelopment analysis and boosted generalized linear mixed models for efficiency assessment. Ann Oper Res. 253(1):77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 24(2):123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brillinger DR, Preisler HK, Benoit JW. 2003. Risk assessment: a forest fire example. Lecture notes–monograph series. 1:177–196.
   Google Scholar
• Buerkner PC, Buerkner MPC. 2016. Package ‘brms’. https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016-12-17/web/packages/brms/brms.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Bui QT, Nguyen QP, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Trinh PT. 2017. A hybrid artificial intelligence approach using GIS-based neural-fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization for forest fire susceptibility modeling at a tropical area. Agric Meteorol. 233:32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Le K-TT, Nguyen VC, Le HD, Revhaug I. 2016. Tropical forest fire susceptibility mapping at the cat Ba National Park Area, Hai Phong City, Vietnam, Using GIS-based kernel logistic regression. Remote Sens. 8(4):347.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho FJ,Santana DGd,Araújo LBd. 2018. Why analyze germination experiments using Generalized Linear Models?. J Seed Sci. 40(3):281–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheret V, Denux JP. 2011. Analysis of MODIS NDVI time series to calculate indicators of Mediterranean forest fire susceptibility. GIScience & Remote Sensing. 48(2):171–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew YJ, Ooi SY, Pang YH, Wong KS. 2022. A Review of forest fire combating efforts, challenges and future directions in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, and Sarawak. Forests. 13(9):1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicas SD, Østergaard Nielsen J. 2022. Who are the actors and what are the factors that are used in models to map forest fire susceptibility? A systematic review. Nat Hazards. 114(3):2417–2434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuvieco E, Cocero D, Riaño D, Martin P, Martı́nez-Vega J, de la Riva J, Pérez F., 2004. Combining NDVI and surface temperature for the estimation of live fuel moisture content in forest fire danger rating. Remote Sens Environ. 92(3):322–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin A, Bernardin D, Sero-Guillaume O. 2011. A physical-based cellular automaton model for forest-fire propagation. Combust Sci Technol. 183(4):347–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das J, Mahato S, Joshi PK, Liou YA. 2023. Forest fire susceptibility zonation in Eastern India using statistical and weighted modelling approaches. Remote Sensing. 15(5):1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de los Campos G, Pérez-Rodríguez P. 2014. Bayesian generalized linear regression. R Package Version1.0.4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BGLR.
   Google Scholar
• de Santana RO, Delgado RC, Schiavetti A. 2021. Modeling susceptibility to forest fires in the Central Corridor of the Atlantic Forest using the frequency ratio method. J Environ Manage. 296:113343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar T,Bhatta B,Aravindan S. 2023. Forest fire occurrence, distribution and risk mapping using geoinformation technology: A case study in the sub-tropical forest of the Meghalaya, India. Remote Sens. Appl: Soc. Environ. 29:100883.
   Google Scholar
• Digavinti J, Manikiam B. 2021. Satellite monitoring of forest fire impact and regeneration using NDVI and LST. J Appl Rem Sens. 15(04):042412–042412.
   Google Scholar
• Ding B, Gentleman R. 2005. Classification using generalized partial least squares. J Comput and Graph Stat. 14(2):280–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastaugh CS, Hasenauer H. 2014. Deriving forest fire ignition risk with biogeochemical process modelling. Environ Model Softw. 55:132–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erten E, Kurgun V, Musaoglu N. 2004. Forest fire risk zone mapping from satellite imagery and GIS. a case study. In XXth Congress of the international society for photogrammetry and remote sensing congress, Istanbul, Turkey; p. 222–230.
   Google Scholar
• Eskandari S, Amiri M, Sãdhasivam N, Pourghasemi HR. 2020. Comparison of new individual and hybrid machine learning algorithms for modeling and mapping fire hazard: a supplementary analysis of fire hazard in different counties of Golestan Province in Iran. Nat Hazards. 104(1):305–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannigan MD, Haar TV. 1986. Forest fire monitoring using NOAA satellite AVHRR. Can J for Res. 16(5):975–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigović L, Pourghasemi HR, Drobnjak S, Bai S. 2019. Testing a new ensemble model based on SVM and random forest in forest fire susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Serbia’s Tara National Park. Forests. 10(5):408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Olabarria JR,Brotons L,Gritten D,Tudela A,Teres JA. 2012. Identifying location and causality of fire ignition hotspots in a Mediterranean region. Int J Wildland Fire. 21(7):905–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ, Van Etten J, Cheng J, Mattiuzzi M, Sumner M, Greenberg JA, Lamigueiro OP, Bevan A, Racine EB, Shortridge A, et al. 2015. Package ‘raster’. R Package. 734:473.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H,Tsangaratos P,Ilia I,Liu J,Zhu A-X,Xu C. 2018. Applying genetic algorithms to set the optimal combination of forest fire related variables and model forest fire susceptibility based on data mining models. The case of Dayu County, China. Sci Total Environ. 630:1044–1056. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.278. 29554726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Shamshirband S, Darabi H, Haghighi AT. 2020. Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles and Bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simulated annealing feature selection method. Sci Total Environ. 711:135161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hothorn T, Buehlmann P, Kneib T, Schmid M, Hofner B, Sobotka F, Scheipl F. 2013. Package ‘mboost.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner K, Lindo Z, Lechowicz MJ. 2012. Post-fire succession of collembolan communities in a northern hardwood forest. Eur J Soil Biol. 48:59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huesca M, Litago J, Palacios-Orueta A, Montes F, Sebastián-López A, Escribano P. 2009. Assessment of forest fire seasonality using MODIS fire potential: a time series approach. Agric Meteorol. 149(11):1946–1955.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafari A,Zenner EK,Panahi M,Shahabi H. 2019. Hybrid artificial intelligence models based on a neuro-fuzzy system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of wildfire probability. Agric For Meteorol. 266–267:198–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain P, Coogan SC, Subramanian SG, Crowley M, Taylor S, Flannigan MD. 2020. A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management. Environ Rev. 28(4):478–505.
   Google Scholar
• Jaiswal RK, Mukherjee S, Raju KD, Saxena R. 2002. Forest fire risk zone mapping from satellite imagery and GIS. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 4(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Junaidi SN, Khalid N, Othman AN, Hamid JRA, Saad NM. 2021. Analysis of the Relationship between Forest Fire and Land Surface Temperature using Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS Imagery. In IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 767(1):012005. May(IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantar B, Ueda N, Idrees MO, Janizadeh S, Ahmadi K, Shabani F. 2020. Forest fire susceptibility prediction based on machine learning models with resampling algorithms on remote sensing data. Remote Sens. 12(22):3682.
   Google Scholar
• Kamata A. 2001. Item analysis by the hierarchical generalized linear model. J Educ Meas. 38(1):79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant Sharma L, Kanga S, Singh Nathawat M, Sinha S, Chandra Pandey P. 2012. Fuzzy AHP for forest fire risk modeling. Dis Preven Manage: Int J. 21(2):160–171.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn M. 2012. The caret package. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://cran.r-project.org/package=caret.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak H, Lee WK, Saborowski J, Lee SY, Won MS, Koo KS, Lee MB, Kim SN. 2012. Estimating the spatial pattern of human-caused forest fires using a generalized linear mixed model with spatial autocorrelation in South Korea. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 26(9):1589–1602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattimer BY, Hodges JL, Lattimer AM. 2020. Using machine learning in physics-based simulation of fire. Fire Saf J. 114:102991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabdeh AN, Al-Fugara AK, Khedher KM, Mabdeh M, Al-Shabeeb AR, Al-Adamat R. 2022. Forest fire susceptibility assessment and mapping using support vector regression and adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy inference system-based evolutionary algorithms. Sustainability. 14(15):9446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffei C,Alfieri S,Menenti M. 2018. Relating Spatiotemporal Patterns of Forest Fires Burned Area and Duration to Diurnal Land Surface Temperature Anomalies. Remote Sens. 10(11):1777.
   Google Scholar
• Marx BD. 1996. Iteratively reweighted partial least squares estimation for generalized linear regression. Technometrics. 38(4):374–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch CE, Searle SR. 2004. Generalized, linear, and mixed models. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster R. 1997. In Memoriam: George F. Jenks (1916-1996). Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci. 24(1):56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Milanović S, Marković N, Pamučar D, Gigović L, Kostić P, Milanović SD. 2020. Forest fire probability mapping in eastern Serbia: logistic regression versus random forest method. Forests. 12(1):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohajane M, Costache R, Karimi F, Pham QB, Essahlaoui A, Nguyen H, Laneve G, Oudija F. 2021. Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a Mediterranean area. Ecol Indic. 129:107869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi SA, Hashemi H, Berndtsson R, Lee S. 2020. Application of extreme gradient boosting and parallel random forest algorithms for assessing groundwater spring potential using DEM-derived factors. J Hydrol. 589:125197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuthammachot N, Stratoulias D. 2021. Multi-criteria decision analysis for forest fire risk assessment by coupling AHP and GIS: method and case study. Environ Dev Sustain. 23(12):17443–17458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal SC,Chakrabortty R,Saha A,Bozchaloei SK,Pham QB,Linh NTT,Anh DT,Janizadeh S,Ahmadi K. 2022. Evaluation of debris flow and landslide hazards using ensemble framework of Bayesian- and tree-based models. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 81(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey K, Ghosh SK. 2018. Modeling of parameters for forest fire risk zone mapping. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XLII-5:299–304.
   Google Scholar
• Pang Y, Li Y, Feng Z, Feng Z, Zhao Z, Chen S, Zhang H. 2022. Forest Fire Occurrence Prediction in China Based on Machine Learning Methods. Remote Sensing. 14(21):5546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Avand M, Al-Ansari N, Dinh Du T, Yen HPH, Phong TV, Nguyen DH, Le HV, Mafi-Gholami D, et al. 2020. Performance evaluation of machine learning methods for forest fire modeling and prediction. Symmetry. 12(6):1022.
   Google Scholar
• Park PJ, Tian L, Kohane IS. 2002. Linking gene expression data with patient survival times using partial least squares. Bioinformatics. 18(suppl_1):S120–S127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul RK. 2006. Multicollinearity: causes, effects and remedies. IASRI, New Delhi. 1(1):58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Peres DJ, Cancelliere A. 2014. Derivation and evaluation of landslide-triggering thresholds by a Monte Carlo approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 18(12):4913–4931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR. 2016. GIS-based forest fire susceptibility mapping in Iran: a comparison between evidential belief function and binary logistic regression models. Scand J Res. 31(1):80–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Kariminejad N, Amiri M, Edalat M, Zarafshar M, Blaschke T, Cerda A. 2020. Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique. Sci Rep. 10(1):3203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Gayen A, Lasaponara R, Tiefenbacher JP. 2020. Application of learning vector quantization and different machine learning techniques to assessing forest fire influence factors and spatial modelling. Environ Res. 184:109321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourtaghi ZS, Pourghasemi HR, Rossi M. 2015. Forest fire susceptibility mapping in the Minudasht forests, Golestan province, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 73(4):1515–1533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A. 2006. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems. 9(2):181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt ED,Keane RE,Brown JK. 2001. Modeling fire effects. Int J Wildland Fire. 10(4):373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes-Bueno F, Loján-Córdova J. 2022. Assessment of three machine learning techniques with open-access geographic data for forest fire susceptibility monitoring—evidence from Southern Ecuador. Forests. 13(3):474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos-Pena L,Kneib T,Cadarso-Suárez C,Marey-Pérez M. 2017. Predicting the occurrence of wildfires with binary structured additive regression models. J Environ Manage. 187:154–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubí JN, de Carvalho PH, Gondim PR. 2023. Application of machine learning models in the behavioral study of forest fires in the Brazilian Federal District region. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 118:105649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A,Pal SC,Santosh M,Janizadeh S,Chowdhuri I,Norouzi A,Roy P,Chakrabortty R. 2021. Modelling multi-hazard threats to cultural heritage sites and environmental sustainability: The present and future scenarios. J Cleaner Prod. 320:128713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Bera B, Kumar Shit P, Bhattacharjee S, Sengupta N. 2023. Prediction of forest fire susceptibility applying machine and deep learning algorithms for conservation priorities of forest resources. Rem Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 29:100917.
   Google Scholar
• Sandri M, Zuccolotto P. 2008. A bias correction algorithm for the Gini variable importance measure in classification trees. J Comput Graph Stat. 17(3):611–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjaya R, Puspitasari D. 2018. August. Noise Reduction through Bagging on Neural Network Algorithm for Forest Fire Estimates. In 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Setiawan I,Mahmud AR,Mansor S,Mohamed Shariff AR,Nuruddin AA. 2004. GIS‐grid‐based and multi‐criteria analysis for identifying and mapping peat swamp forest fire hazard in Pahang, Malaysia. Disaster Prev and Management. 13(5):379–386.
   Google Scholar
• Shahfahad T, Das T, Naikoo MW, Rihan M, Rahman A. 2022. Forest fire susceptibility mapping by integrating remote sensing and machine learning algorithms. Adv Rem Sens Forest Monitoring. 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Feng Z, Cao M, Wang W, Sun L, Yang X, Ma T, Guo Z, Fahad S, Liu X, et al. 2023. An ensemble model for forest fire occurrence mapping in China. Forests. 14(4):704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup WW. 2012. Generalized linear mixed models: modern concepts, methods and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton CD. 2005. Classification and regression trees, bagging, and boosting. In: Dey DK, Rao CR, editor. Handbook of statistics Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; p. 303–329.
   Google Scholar
• Taloor AK, Manhas DS, Kothyari GC. 2021. Retrieval of land surface temperature, normalized difference moisture index, normalized difference water index of the Ravi basin using Landsat data. Appl Comput Geosci. 9:100051.
   Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Das T, Naikoo MW, Rihan M, Rahman A. 2022. Forest fire susceptibility mapping by integrating remote sensing and machine learning algorithms. Adv Rem Sens Forest Monitor. 2022:179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Tang X, Machimura T, Li J, Liu W, Hong H. 2020. A novel optimized repeatedly random undersampling for selecting negative samples: a case study in an SVM-based forest fire susceptibility assessment. J Environ Manage. 271:111014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq A, Shu H, Siddiqui S, Mousa BG, Munir I, Nasri A, Waqas H, Lu L, Baqa MF. 2021. Forest fire monitoring using spatial-statistical and Geo-spatial analysis of factors determining forest fire in Margalla Hills, Islamabad, Pakistan. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):1212–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Jones S, Shabani F, Martínez-Álvarez F, Bui DT. 2019. A novel ensemble modeling approach for the spatial prediction of tropical forest fire susceptibility using LogitBoost machine learning classifier and multi-source geospatial data. Theor Appl Climatol. 137(1-2):637–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D,Hoang N-D,Samui P. 2019. Spatial pattern analysis and prediction of forest fire using new machine learning approach of Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines and Differential Flower Pollination optimization: A case study at Lao Cai province (Viet Nam). J Environ Manage. 237:476–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomar JS, Kranjčić N, Đurin B, Kanga S, Singh SK. 2021. Forest fire hazards vulnerability and risk assessment in Sirmaur district forest of Himachal Pradesh (India): a geospatial approach. IJGI. 10(7):447.
   Google Scholar
• Tran MN, Nguyen N, Nott D, Kohn R. 2020. Bayesian deep net GLM and GLMM. J Comput Graph Stat. 29(1):97–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Cuentas NI, Roman-Gonzalez A. 2021. Satellite-based analysis of forest fires in the bolivian chiquitania and amazon region: case 2019. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag. 36(2):38–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinger R, O'connell M. 1993. Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul. 48(3-4):233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Peng M. 2019. Forest fire forecasting using ensemble learning approaches. Neural Comput Appl. 31(9):4541–4550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaakob R, Mustapha N, Nuruddin AAB, Sitanggang IS. 2011. Modeling forest fires risk using spatial decision tree. In 2011 3rd Conference on Data Mining and Optimization (DMO). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; p. 103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Yonelinas AP. 1994. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cogn. 20(6):1341–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. and Ma, Y. eds 2012. Ensemble machine learning: methods and applications. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Huang W, Li S, Zeng Y. 2017. Forest fire spread simulating model using cellular automaton with extreme learning machine. Ecol Modell. 348:33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Staudenmayer J, Coull BA, Wand MP. 2006. General design Bayesian generalized linear mixed models. Statist Sci. 21(1):35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar