An ensemble deep-learning framework for landslide susceptibility assessment using multiple blocks: a case study of Wenchuan area, China

References

• Aditian A, Kubota T, Shinohara Y. 2018. Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia. Geomorphology. 318:101–111. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato G, Eisank C, Castro-Camilo D, Lombardo L. 2019. Accounting for covariate distributions in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models. A case study in the alpine environment. Eng Geol. 260:105237. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy R, Sen K. 2021a. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using projected storm rainfall and land use in Himalayan region. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(7):5237–5258. doi:10.1007/s10064-021-02252-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy R. 2021b. Torrential rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning and statistical methods of eastern Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 107(1):697–722. doi:10.1007/s11069-021-04601-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai FC, Lee CF. 2001. Terrain-based mapping of landslide susceptibility using a geographical information system: a case study. Can Geotech J. 38(5):911–923. doi:10.1139/t01-021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yamagishi H, Pourghasemi HR, Yunus AP, Song X, Xu Y, Zhu Z. 2015. An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan. Nat Hazards. 78(3):1749–1776. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1799-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Bui DT, Merghadi A, Sahana M, Zhu Z, Chen C, Han Z, Pham BT. 2020. Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan. Landslides. 17(3):641–658. doi:10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Wang Y, Peng L, Hong H. 2021. A comparative study of heterogeneous ensemble-learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 35(2):321–347. doi:10.1080/13658816.2020.1808897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feizizadeh B, Roodposhti MS, Jankowski P, Blaschke T. 2014. A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci. 73:208–221. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2014.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Crivellari A, Ghamisi P, Shahabi H, Blaschke T. 2021. A comprehensive transferability evaluation of U-Net and ResU-Net for landslide detection from Sentinel-2 data (case study areas from Taiwan, China, and Japan). Sci Rep. 11(1):1–20. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94190-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Rostamzadeh H, Blaschke T, Gholaminia K, Aryal J. 2018. A new GIS-based data mining technique using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and k-fold cross-validation approach for land subsidence susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards. 94(2):497–517. doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3449-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Xu Y, Ghamis P, Kopp M, Kreil D. 2022. Landslide4sense: reference benchmark data and deep learning models for landslide detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 60:1–17. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2022.3215209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudiyangada Nachappa T, Kienberger S, Meena SR, Hölbling D, Blaschke T. 2020. Comparison and validation of per-pixel and object-based approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 11(1):572–600. doi:10.1080/19475705.2020.1736190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. IEEE Comput Vision Pattern Recogn:770–778. doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhao L. 2018. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. CATENA. 165:520–529. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaydhar AK, Pal SC, Saha A, Islam ARMT, Ruidas D. 2022. Hydrogeochemical evaluation and corresponding health risk from elevated arsenic and fluoride contamination in recurrent coastal multi-aquifers of eastern India. J Clean Prod. 369:133150. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzh O, Cook G, Andersen T, Serra E. 2017. Stacking approach for CNN transfer learning ensemble for remote sensing imagery. IEEE Intell Syst Conf:599–608. doi:10.1109/intellisys.2017.8324356.
   Google Scholar
• Li B, Lima D. 2021. Facial expression recognition via ResNet-50. Int J Cogn Comput Eng. 2:57–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijcce.2021.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang W, Chen G, Han Z. 2022. Spatiotemporal assessment of landslide susceptibility in Southern Sichuan, China using SA-DBN, PSO-DBN and SSA-DBN models compared with DBN model. Adv Space Res. 69(8):3071–3087. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.01.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, He J, Chen F, Han Z, Wang W, Chen G, Huang J. 2021. Generation of homogeneous slope units using a novel object-oriented multi-resolution segmentation method. Water. 13(23):3422. doi:10.3390/w13233422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Huang J, Pu H, Han Z, Li W, Yan B. 2017. Semiautomatic landslide detection using remote sensing and slope units. Transportation Res Record. 2604(1):104–110. doi:10.3141/2604-13.
   Google Scholar
• Lv L, Chen T, Dou J, Plaza A. 2022. A hybrid ensemble-based deep-learning framework for landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Appl Earth Obs. 108:102713. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal SC, Chowdhuri I. 2019. GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using frequency ratio model of Lachung River basin, North Sikkim, India. SN Appl Sci. 1(5):1–25. doi:10.1007/s42452-019-0422-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal SC, Ruidas D, Saha A, Islam ARMT, Chowdhuri I. 2022. Application of novel data-mining technique-based nitrate concentration susceptibility prediction approach for coastal aquifers in India. J Clean Prod. 346:131205. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panahi M, Rahmati O, Rezaie F, Lee S, Mohammadi F, Conoscenti C. 2022. Application of the group method of data handling (GMDH) approach for landslide susceptibility zonation using readily available spatial covariates. CATENA. 208:105779. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2021.105779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phong LT, Phuong TT. 2019. Privacy-preserving deep learning via weight transmission. IEEE Trans Inform Forensic Secur. 14(11):3003–3015. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2019.2911169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran H, Wen S, Shi K, Huang T. 2021. Stable and compact design of Memristive GoogLeNet neural network. Neurocomputing. 441:52–63. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.01.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F. 2018. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Sci Rev. 180:60–91. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi M, Guzzetti F, Salvati P, Donnini M, Napolitano E, Bianchi C. 2019. A predictive model of societal landslide risk in Italy. Earth-Sci Rev. 196:102849. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruidas D, Chakrabortty R, Islam ARMT, Saha A, Pal SC. 2022a. A novel hybrid of meta-optimization approach for flash flood-susceptibility assessment in a monsoon-dominated watershed, Eastern India. Environ Earth Sci. 81(5):145. doi:10.1007/s12665-022-10269-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruidas D, Pal SC, Islam ARMT, Saha A. 2021. Characterization of groundwater potential zones in water-scarce hardrock regions using data driven model. Environ Earth Sci. 80(24):1–18. doi:10.1007/s12665-021-10116-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruidas D, Pal SC, Saha A, Chowdhuri I, Shit M. 2022b. Hydrogeochemical characterization based water resources vulnerability assessment in India’s first Ramsar site of Chilka lake. Mar Pollut Bull. 184:114107. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruidas D, Pal SC, Towfiqul Islam ARM, Saha A. 2022c. Hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater aquifers and associated health hazard risk mapping using ensemble data driven model in a water scares plateau region of eastern India. Expo Health. 15(1):113–131. doi:10.1007/s12403-022-00480-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Saha S. 2020. Comparing the efficiency of weight of evidence, support vector machine and their ensemble approaches in landslide susceptibility modelling: a study on Kurseong region of Darjeeling Himalaya, India. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 19:100323. doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100323.
   Google Scholar
• Saha S, Arabameri A, Saha A, Blaschke T, Ngo PTT, Nhu VH, Band SS. 2021. Prediction of landslide susceptibility in Rudraprayag, India using novel ensemble of conditional probability and boosted regression tree-based on cross-validation method. Sci Total Environ. 764:142928. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahri AA, Spross J, Johansson F, Larsson S. 2019. Landslide susceptibility hazard map in southwest Sweden using artificial neural network. CATENA. 183:104225. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Shi S, Wen H, Xu J, Zhou X, Wu J. 2021a. A hybrid optimization method of factor screening predicated on GeoDetector and Random Forest for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomorpholopy. 379:107623. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Wen H, Wang D, Xu J. 2020. A random forest model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using Bayes algorithm. Geomorphology. 362:107201. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Xu J, Wen H, Wang D. 2021b. Assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping based on Bayesian hyperparameter optimization: a comparison between logistic regression and random forest. Eng Geo. 281:105972. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dao D, Jaafari A, Bayat M, Mafi-Gholami D, Qi C, Moayedi H, Phong TV, Ly H, Le T, Trinh PT, et al. 2020. A spatially explicit deep learning neural network model for the prediction of landslide susceptibility. CATENA. 188:104451. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Hao J, Ma J, Jiang H. 2011. A comparative assessment of ensemble learning for credit scoring. Expert Syst Appl. 38(1):223–230. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhang L, Luo H, He J, Cheung RWM. 2021a. AI-powered landslide susceptibility assessment in Hong Kong. Eng Geol. 288:106103. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li S, Liu H, Liu L, Liu Y, Zeng S, Tang Q. 2021b. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Wenchuan County after the 5.12 magnitude earthquake. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(7):5369–5390. doi:10.1007/s10064-021-02280-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Hong H. 2019. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China. Sci Total Environ. 666:975–993. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Wang M, Peng L, Hong H. 2020a. Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks. Comput Geosci-UK. 138:104445. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Sun D, Wen H, Zhang H, Zhang F. 2020b. Comparison of random forest model and frequency ratio model for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China). IJERPH. 17(12):4206. doi:10.3390/ijerph17124206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao L, Zhang Y, Peng G. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment using integrated deep learning algorithm along the China-Nepal highway. Sensors. 18(12):4436. doi:10.3390/s18124436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Liu C, Nie R, Yang Z, Li W, Dai X, Cheng J, Zhang J, Ma L, Fu X, et al. 2022. A comparative analysis of certainty factor-based machine learning methods for collapse and landslide susceptibility mapping in Wenchuan County, China. Remote Sens-Basel. 14(14):3259. doi:10.3390/rs14143259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Song Y, Xu S, He Y, Li Z, Yu X, Liang Y, Wu W, Wang Y. 2022. Combining a class-weighted algorithm and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Wanzhou section of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Comput Geosci-UK. 158:104966. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wang R, Jiang Y, Liu H, Wei Z. 2019. GIS-based logistic regression for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility mapping under different grid sizes in Yueqing, Southeastern China. Eng Geo. 259:105147. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, He Y, Yao S, Yang W, Wang W, Zhang L, Sun Q. 2022. A comparative study of different neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Adv Space Res. 70(2):383–401. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Huang L, Fan L, Huang J, Huang F, Chen J, Zhang Z, Wang Y. 2020. Landslide susceptibility prediction modeling based on remote sensing and a novel deep learning algorithm of a cascade-parallel recurrent neural network. Sensors. 20(6):1576. doi:10.3390/s20061576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar