Urban flooding risk assessment based on FAHP–EWM combination weighting: a case study of Beijing

References

• Akter M, Jahan M, Kabir R, Karim DS, Haque A, Rahman M, Salehin M. 2019. Risk assessment based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Sci Total Environ. 658:818–829. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali K, Bajracharya RM, Koirala HL. 2016. A review of flood risk assessment. Int J Environ Agric Biotech. 1(4):1065–1077. doi:10.22161/ijeab/1.4.62.
   Google Scholar
• Ali SA, Parvin F, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Costache R, Linh NTT, Nguyen HQ, Ahmad A, Ghorbani MA. 2020. GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: a case of Topľa basin, Slovakia. Ecol Indic. 117:106620. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven T. 2016. Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur J Oper Res. 253(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai T, Li X, Ding X, Wang J, Zhan J. 2019. Flood risk assessment based on hydrodynamic model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with GIS technique. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 35:101077. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Liu R, Barrett D, Gao L, Zhou M, Renzullo L, Emelyanova I. 2015. A spatial assessment framework for evaluating flood risk under extreme climates. Sci Total Environ. 538:512–523. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Zhang LJ, Tao G. 2017. Research on risk assessment index system of safety production in coastal cities based on disaster-pregnant environment. China Safety Prod Sci Technol. 13(5):116–121.
   Google Scholar
• Ekmekcioğlu Ö, Koc K, Özger M. 2022. Towards flood risk mapping based on multi-tiered decision making in a densely urbanized metropolitan city of Istanbul. Sustain Cities Soc. 80:103759. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.103759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakidou C, Diakoulaki D, Memos CD. 2020. Vulnerability to coastal flooding of industrial urban areas in Greece. Environ Process. 7(3):749–766. doi:10.1007/s40710-020-00442-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee-Morlot J. 2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Change. 3(9):802–806. doi:10.1038/nclimate1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He B, Ming XS, Liu QH, Huang C. 2022. China heavy rainfall dataset from 2001 to 2019 based on GPM satellite rainfall products. Chinese Sci Data. 7(2):231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Hoque MA-A, Tasfia S, Ahmed N, Pradhan B. 2019. Assessing spatial flood vulnerability at Kalapara upazila in Bangladesh using an analytic hierarchy process. Sensors. 19(6):1302. doi:10.3390/s19061302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, She JW. 2020. Vulnerability assessment and influencing factors analysis of flood disaster in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. J Hohai Univ. 22(6):39–45. +110–111.
   Google Scholar
• Huang DP, Zheng W, Zhang RH, Huo ZG, Li JL, Peng SF. 2011. Assessment of flood disaster prevention and mitigation capacity in Anhui Huaihe River Basin. Geogr Study. 30(3):523–530.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kong F. 2018. Data set of long and short duration rainstorm in Chinese mainland (1961–2015). J Glob Change Data. 2(3):309–315. +198–204. doi:10.3974/geodp.2018.03.09.
   Google Scholar
• Lee G, Choi J, Jun KS. 2017. MCDM approach for identifying urban flood vulnerability under social environment and climate change. J Coast Res. 79(2):209–213. doi:10.2112/SI79-043.1.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Sun N, Lu Y, Guo B, Wang Y, Sun X, Yao Y. 2022. Review on urban flood risk assessment. Sustainability. 15(1):765. doi:10.3390/su15010765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin L, Wu Z, Liang Q. 2019. Urban flood susceptibility analysis using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework. Nat Hazards. 97(2):455–475. doi:10.1007/s11069-019-03615-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Xu Z, Chen F, Chen F, Zhang L. 2019. Flood hazard mapping and assessment on the Angkor world heritage site, Cambodia. Remote Sens. 11(1):98. doi:10.3390/rs11010098.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud SH, Gan TY. 2018. Urbanization and climate change implications in flood risk management: developing an efficient decision support system for flood susceptibility mapping. Sci Total Environ. 636:152–167. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra K, Sinha R. 2020. Flood risk assessment in the Kosi megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: a hydro-geomorphic approach. Geomorphology. 350:106861. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni Y, Zhang YP, Wang SH. 2017. Safety and reliability analysis of train control vehicle system based on AHP and comparative possibility relation. J Safety Environ. 17(5):1676–1680.
   Google Scholar
• Peng J, Zhang J. 2022. Urban flooding risk assessment based on GIS-game theory combination weight: a case study of Zhengzhou city. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 77:103080. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Luu C, Van Phong T, Nguyen HD, Van Le H, Tran TQ, Ta HT, Prakash I. 2021. Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. J Hydrol. 592:125815. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Bose A, Singha N, Basak D, Chowdhury IR. 2021. Urban waterlogging risk as an undervalued environmental challenge: an integrated MCDA-GIS based modeling approach. Environ Chall. 4:100194. doi:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100194.
   Google Scholar
• Sado-Inamura Y, Fukushi K. 2019. Empirical analysis of flood risk perception using historical data in Tokyo. Land Use Policy. 82:13–29. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Hosseini SZ, Ildoromi AR. 2019. Assessment of flood hazard mapping in urban areas using entropy weighting method: a case study in Hamadan city, Iran. Acta Geophys. 67(5):1435–1449. doi:10.1007/s11600-019-00342-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha BB, Kawasaki A. 2020. Quantitative assessment of flood risk with evaluation of the effectiveness of dam operation for flood control: a case of the Bago river basin of Myanmar. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 50:101707. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Jones S, Shabani F. 2019. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques. Catena. 175:174–192. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallemacq P, Below R, McClean D. 2018. Economic losses, poverty & disasters: 1998-2017. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/publication/economic-lossespoverty-disasters-1998-2017
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Du S, Wen J, Zhang M, Gu H, Shi Y, Xu H. 2017. Analyzing explanatory factors of urban pluvial floods in Shanghai using geographically weighted regression. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 31(7):1777–1790. doi:10.1007/s00477-016-1242-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Lai C, Chen X, Yang B, Zhao S, Bai X. 2015. Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. J Hydrol. 527:1130–1141. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Liu Y, Hu Z, Lyu Y, Zhang G, Liu J, Liu Y, Gu Y, Huang X, Zheng H, et al. 2020. Flood risk assessment based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation method in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area, China. Sustainability. 12(4):1451. doi:10.3390/su12041451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Li Y, Yu P, Zhang Y. 2021. The analysis of urban flood risk propagation based on the modified susceptible infected recovered model. J Hydrol. 603:127121. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xie H. 2018. A review on applications of remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) in water resources and flood risk management. Water. 10(5):608. doi:10.3390/w10050608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Shen Y, Wang H. 2019. Assessing urban areas’ vulnerability to flood disaster based on text data: a case study in Zhengzhou city. Sustainability. 11(17): 4548. doi:10.3390/su11174548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Chen X, Lu J. 2022. Assessment of long and short-term flood risk using the multi-criteria analysis model with the AHP-Entropy method in Poyang Lake basin. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 75:102968. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Ma C, Lian J, Xu K, Chaima E. 2018. Urban flooding risk assessment based on an integrated k-means cluster algorithm and improved entropy weight method in the region of Haikou, China. J Hydrol. 563:975–986. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Huang G. 2018. Set pair analysis for karst waterlogging risk assessment based on AHP and entropy weight. Hydrol Res. 49(4):1143–1155. doi:10.2166/nh.2017.265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Liu L, Chen X, Gao Y, Xie S, Mi J. 2021. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series LANDSAT imagery. Earth Syst Sci Data. 13(6):2753–2776. doi:10.5194/essd-13-2753-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wu Z, Zhang H, Dalla Fontana G, Tarolli P. 2020. Identifying dominant factors of waterlogging events in metropolitan coastal cities: the case study of Guangzhou, China. J Environ Manage. 271:110951. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xia J, Yu J, Randall M, Zhang Y, Zhao T, Pan X, Zhai X, Shao Q. 2018. Simulation and assessment of urbanization impacts on runoff metrics: insights from landuse changes. J Hydrol. 560:247–258. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng G, Zhu N, Tian Z, Chen Y, Sun B. 2012. Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Saf Sci. 50(2):228–239. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar