In vitro adhesion, pilus expression, and in vivo amelioration of antibiotic-induced microbiota disturbance by Bifidobacterium spp. strains from fecal donors

References

• Tojo R. Intestinal microbiota in health and disease: role of bifidobacteria in gut homeostasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(41):15163. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Tilg H, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Kump P, Satokari R, Sokol H, Arkkila P, Pintus C, Hart A, et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2017;66(4):569–16. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allegretti JR, Mullish BH, Kelly C, Fischer M. The evolution of the use of faecal microbiota transplantation and emerging therapeutic indications. Lancet. 2019;394(10196):420–431. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31266-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianiro G, Punčochář M, Karcher N, Porcari S, Armanini F, Asnicar F, Beghini F, Blanco-Míguez A, Cumbo F, Manghi P, et al. Variability of strain engraftment and predictability of microbiome composition after fecal microbiota transplantation across different diseases. Nat Med. 2022;28(9):1913–1923. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01964-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arboleya S, Watkins C, Stanton C, Ross RP. Gut Bifidobacteria populations in human health and aging. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:7. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranti S, Longhi G, Ventura M, van Sinderen D, Turroni F. Exploring the ecology of bifidobacteria and their genetic adaptation to the mammalian gut. Microorganisms. 2020;9(1):8. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9010008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandri G, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. The genus Bifidobacterium: from genomics to functionality of an important component of the mammalian gut microbiota. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:1472–1487. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura M, Turroni F, Motherway MO, MacSharry J, van Sinderen D. Host–microbe interactions that facilitate gut colonization by commensal bifidobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20(10):467–476. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani C, Mangifesta M, Mancabelli L, Lugli GA, Mancino W, Viappiani A, Faccini A, van Sinderen D, Ventura M, Turroni F. The sortase-dependent fimbriome of the genus bifidobacterium: extracellular structures with potential to modulate microbe-host dialogue. Elkins CA, ed. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(19):e01295–e17. doi:10.1128/AEM.01295-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, Ferrario C, Lugli GA, Mancabelli L, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bifidobacteria and the infant gut: an example of co-evolution and natural selection. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(1):103–118. doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2672-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelli L, Pellegrino P. A critical evaluation of the factors affecting the survival and persistence of beneficial bacteria in healthy adults. Benef Microbes. 2021;12(4):321–331. doi:10.3920/BM2021.0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westermann C, Gleinser M, Corr SC, Riedel CU. A critical evaluation of bifidobacterial adhesion to the host tissue. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:7. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyclik M, Srutkova D, Schwarzer M, Górska S. Bifidobacteria cell wall-derived exo-polysaccharides, lipoteichoic acids, peptidoglycans, polar lipids and proteins – their chemical structure and biological attributes. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;147:333–349. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell Motherway M, Zomer A, Leahy SC, Reunanen J, Bottacini F, Claesson MJ, O’Brien F, Flynn K, Casey PG, Moreno Munoz JA, et al. Functional genome analysis of Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 reveals type IVb tight adherence (Tad) pili as an essential and conserved host-colonization factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(27):11217–11222. doi:10.1073/pnas.1105380108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amrane S, Hocquart M, Afouda P, Kuete E, Pham TPT, Dione N, Ngom II, Valles C, Bachar D, Raoult D, et al. Metagenomic and culturomic analysis of gut microbiota dysbiosis during Clostridium difficile infection. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12807. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49189-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jouhten H, Ronkainen A, Aakko J, Salminen S, Mattila E, Arkkila P, Satokari R. Cultivation and genomics prove long-term colonization of donor’s bifidobacteria in recurrent clostridioides difficile patients treated with fecal microbiota transplantation. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1663. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag TL, Hartikainen A, Jouhten H, Sahl C, Meri S, Anttila V-J, Mattila E, Arkkila P, Jalanka J, Satokari R, et al. Minor effect of antibiotic pre-treatment on the engraftment of donor microbiota in fecal transplantation in mice. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2685. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quartieri A, Simone M, Gozzoli C, Popovic M, D’Auria G, Amaretti A, Raimondi S, Rossi M. Comparison of culture-dependent and independent approaches to characterize fecal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. Anaerobe. 2016;38:130–137. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainulainen V, Reunanen J, Hiippala K, Guglielmetti S, Vesterlund S, Palva A, Satokari R. BopA does not have a major role in the adhesion of bifidobacterium bifidum to intestinal epithelial cells, extracellular matrix proteins, and mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(22):6989–6997. doi:10.1128/AEM.01993-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainulainen V, Tang Y, Spillmann T, Kilpinen S, Reunanen J, Saris P, Satokari R. The canine isolate Lactobacillus acidophilus LAB20 adheres to intestinal epithelium and attenuates LPS-induced IL-8 secretion of enterocytes in vitro. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12866-014-0337-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–i890. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–3048. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
   Google Scholar
• Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(22):3691–3693. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows–wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12(1):323. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. EdgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–140. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonen A, Nikkilä J, Jalanka-Tuovinen J, Immonen O, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Kekkonen RA, Palva A, de Vos WM. Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis. J Microbiol Methods. 2010;81(2):127–134. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira PAB, Aho VTE, Paulin L, Pekkonen E, Auvinen P, Scheperjans F. Oral and nasal microbiota in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;38:61–67. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17(1):10. doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–583. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glockner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41(D1):D590–D596. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurdie PJ, Holmes S, Watson M. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. Watson M, ed. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61217. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan BJ, Sankaran K, Fukuyama JA, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. Bioconductor workflow for microbiome data analysis: from raw reads to community analyses. F1000Research. 2016;5:1492. doi:10.12688/f1000research.8986.2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett. 2006;9(6):683–693. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00926.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MJ. Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics. 2006;62(1):245–253. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalanka J, Mattila E, Jouhten H, Hartman J, de Vos WM, Arkkila P, Satokari R. Long-term effects on luminal and mucosal microbiota and commonly acquired taxa in faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):155. doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0698-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jungersen M, Wind A, Johansen E, Christensen J, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Eskesen D. The science behind the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12®. Microorganisms. 2014;2(2):92–110. doi:10.3390/microorganisms2020092.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwala V, Mogno I, Li Z, Yang C, Britton GJ, Chen-Liaw A, Mitcham J, Bongers G, Gevers D, Clemente JC, et al. Precise quantification of bacterial strains after fecal microbiota transplantation delineates long-term engraftment and explains outcomes. Nature Microbiology. 2021;6(10):1309–1318. doi:10.1038/s41564-021-00966-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrien M, Turroni F, Ventura M, van Sinderen D. Insights into endogenous Bifidobacterium species in the human gut microbiota during adulthood. Trends Microbiol. 2022;30(10):940–947. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2022.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Li L, Wang Q, Sadiq FA, Lee Y, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W, Li H, Lu W, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the genes involved in Bifidobacterium Longum FGSZY16M3 biofilm formation. Microorganisms. 2021;9(2):385. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9020385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankainen M, Paulin L, Tynkkynen S, von Ossowski I, Reunanen J, Partanen P, Satokari R, Vesterlund S, Hendrickx APA, Lebeer S, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human- mucus binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(40):17193–17198. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908876106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm V, Radulovic K, Riedel CU, Gerlach RG. Colonization of C57BL/6 mice by a potential probiotic bifidobacterium bifidum strain under germ-free and specific pathogen-free conditions and during experimental colitis. Gerlach RG, ed. PLOS One. 2015;10(10):e0139935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg R, Toft MF, Metzdorff SB, Hansen CHF, Licht TR, Bahl MI, Hansen AK. Human microbiota-transplanted C57BL/6 mice and offspring display reduced establishment of key bacteria and reduced immune stimulation compared to mouse microbiota-transplantation. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7805. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64703-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Gómez MX, Martínez I, Bottacini F, O’Callaghan A, Ventura M, van Sinderen D, Hillmann B, Vangay P, Knights D, Hutkins R, et al. Stable engraftment of Bifidobacterium longum AH1206 in the human gut depends on individualized features of the resident microbiome. Cell Host & Microbe. 2016;20(4):515–526. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basson AR, LaSalla A, Lam G, Kulpins D, Moen EL, Sundrud MS, Miyoshi J, Ilic S, Theriault BR, Cominelli F, et al. Artificial microbiome heterogeneity spurs six practical action themes and examples to increase study power-driven reproducibility. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5039. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60900-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell W, Burch R The principles of humane experimental technique. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg school of public health. [accessed 2023 May 22]. http://caat.jhsph.edu/principles/the-principles-of-humane-experimental-technique.
   Google Scholar