A lineage-specific protein network at the trypanosome nuclear envelope

References

• Patil S, Sengupta K. Role of A- and B-type lamins in nuclear structure–function relationships. Biol Cell. 2021;113:295–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazer S, Lynch M, Needleman D. Deciphering the evolutionary history of open and closed mitosis. Curr Biol. 2014;24(22):R1099–R1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koreny L, Field MC. Ancient eukaryotic origin and evolutionary plasticity of nuclear lamina. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8:2663–2671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rout MP, Obado SO, Schenkman S, et al. Specialising the parasite nucleus: pores, lamins, chromatin, and diversity. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(3):1006170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber A, Riemer D, Bovenschulte M, et al. Molecular phylogeny of metazoan intermediate filament proteins. J Mol Evol. 1998;47:751–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciska M, Masuda K, Moreno Díaz de la Espina S. Lamin-like analogues in plants: the characterization of NMCP1 in Allium cepa. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(6):1553–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciska M, Masuda K, Moreno Díaz de la Espina S. Characterization of the lamin analogue NMCP2 in the monocot Allium cepa. Chromosoma. 2018;127:103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois KN, Alsford S, Holden JM, et al. NUP-1 is a large coiled-coil nucleoskeletal protein in trypanosomes with lamin-like functions. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(3):e1001287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maishman L, Obado SO, Alsford S, et al. Co-dependence between trypanosome nuclear lamina components in nuclear stability and control of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(22):10554–10570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinke P, Schirmer EC. LINC’ing form and function at the nuclear envelope. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(19PartA):2514–2521.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton LJ, Soshnev AA, Geyer PK. Networking in the nucleus: a spotlight on LEM-domain proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;34:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah S, Dhanasekaran K, Kumar S. The LEM-ESCRT toolkit: repair and maintenance of the nucleus. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:989217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho R, Hegele RA. Complex effects of laminopathy mutations on nuclear structure and function. Clin Genet. 2019;95(2):199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin DH, Hoelz A. The structure of the nuclear pore complex (an update). Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field MC, Rout MP. Pore timing: the evolutionary origins of the nucleus and nuclear pore complex [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Res. 2019;8:369.
   Google Scholar
• Ptak C, Wozniak RW. Nucleoporins and chromatin metabolism. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016;40:153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampoelz B, Andres-Pons A, Kastritis P, et al. Structure and assembly of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biophys. 2019;48:52118–115308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosalaganti S, Kosinski J, Albert S, et al. In situ architecture of the algal nuclear pore complex. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steverding D. Sleeping sickness and Nagana disease caused by Trypanosoma brucei. In: Marcondes CB, editor. Arthropod borne diseases. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Burki F, Roger AJ, Brown MW, et al. The new tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol Evol. 2020;35(1):43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico E, Jeacock L, Kovářová J, et al. Inducible high-efficiency CRISPR-Cas9-targeted gene editing and precision base editing in African trypanosomes. Sci Rep. 2018;8:7960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover L, Alsford S, Baker N, et al. Genome-scale RNAi screens for high-throughput phenotyping in bloodstream-form African trypanosomes. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:106–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria J, Glover L, Hutchinson S, et al. Monoallelic expression and epigenetic inheritance sustained by a Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein exclusion complex. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deák G, Wapenaar H, Sandoval G, et al. Histone divergence in Trypanosoma brucei results in unique alterations to nucleosome structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;gkad577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria JRC. A nuclear enterprise: zooming in on nuclear organization and gene expression control in the African trypanosome. Parasitology. 2021;148:1237–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla-Mejia NE, Makarov AA, Barlow LD, et al. Evolution and diversification of the nuclear envelope. Nucleus. 2021;12:21–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenezer TE, Zoltner M, Burrell A, et al. Transcriptome, proteome and draft genome of Euglena gracilis. BMC Biol. 2019;17:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGrasse JA, DuBois KN, Devos D, et al. Evidence for a shared nuclear pore complex architecture that is conserved from the last common eukaryotic ancestor. Mol Cell Proteom. 2009;8:2119–2130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obado SO, Brillantes M, Uryu K, et al. Interactome mapping reveals the evolutionary history of the nuclear pore complex. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obado SO, Field MC, Chait BT, et al. High-efficiency isolation of nuclear envelope protein complexes from Trypanosomes. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1411:67–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 1991;252(5009):1162–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol. 2004;338:1027–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction-the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:429–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, et al. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 1997;10:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, Von Heijne G, et al. Improved prediction of signal peptides - SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004;340:783–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, et al. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D200–D203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam S-Z, et al. A completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J Mol Biol. 2018;430(15):2237–2243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabler F, Nam S-Z, Till S, et al. Protein sequence analysis using the MPI bioinformatics toolkit. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2020;72:e108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Castro E, Sigrist CJA, Gattiker A, et al. ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;34:W362–W365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigrist CJA, de Castro E, Cerutti L, et al. New and continuing developments at PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D344–D347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier R, Douguet D, Antonny B, et al. HELIQUEST: a web server to screen sequences with specific α-helical properties. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(18):2101–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinegger M, Meier M, Mirdita M, et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20(1):473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D412–D419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Tomita M, et al. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:10171–10176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brameier M, Krings A, MacCallum RM. NucPred - Predicting nuclear localization of proteins. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1159–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen Ba AN, Pogoutse A, Provart N, et al. NL Stradamus: a simple hidden Markov model for nuclear localization signal prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D439–D444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeepMind. AlphaFold Colab [Internet]. Available from: https://colab.research.google.com/github/deepmind/alphafold/blob/main/notebooks/AlphaFold.ipynb
   Google Scholar
• Linding R, Russell RB, Neduva V, et al. GlobPlot: exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3701–3708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirdita M, Schütze K, Moriwaki Y, et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods. 2022;19:679–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans R, O’Neill M, Pritzel A, et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Schrodinger LLC. The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 2.5.2. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Youkharibache P, Zhang D, et al. ICn3D, a web-based 3D viewer for sharing 1D/2D/3D representations of biomolecular structures. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm L. Using dali for protein structure comparison. In: Gáspári Z, editor. Structural Bioinformatics: Methods in Molecular Biology. New York NY: Springer US; 2020. pp. 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Blum M, Chang H-Y, Chuguransky S, et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D344–D354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST And PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence TJ, Kauffman KT, Amrine KCH, et al. FAST: FAST analysis of sequences toolbox. Front Genet. 2015;6:172. DOI:10.3389/fgene.2015.00172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry J, Finn RD, Eddy SR, et al. Challenges in homology search: HMMER3 and convergent evolution of coiled-coil regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(12):e121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield ER, Abbott JC, Field MC. Automated phylogenetic analysis using best reciprocal BLAST. In: De Pablos, LM, Sotillo, J, editors. Parasite genomics: Methods in Molecular Biology. New York: Humana; 2021. pp. 41–63.
   Google Scholar
• Aslett M, Aurrecoechea C, Berriman M, et al. TriTrypDB: a functional genomic resource for the trypanosomatidae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;38:D457–D462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates AD, Allen J, Amode RM, et al. Ensembl genomes 2022: an expanding genome resource for non-vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D996–D1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D20–D26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvaud S, Gabella C, Lisacek F, et al. Expasy, the Swiss bioinformatics resource portal, as designed by its users. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W216–W227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter DJ, Berney C, Strassert JFH, et al. EukProt: a database of genome-scale predicted proteins across the diversity of eukaryotes. Peer Community J. 2022;2:e56.
   Google Scholar
• Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59(3):307–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). IEEE; 2010. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• European Nucleotide Archive. Project: PRJEB36170 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 30]; Available from: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB36170
   Google Scholar
• Davey JW, Catta-Preta CMC, James S, et al. Chromosomal assembly of the nuclear genome of the endosymbiont-bearing trypanosomatid Angomonas deanei. G3: Genes. Genomes, Genetics. 2021;11:jkaa018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Nucleotide Archive. Project: PRJEB3146 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 5]; Available from: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB3146
   Google Scholar
• Jackson AP, Otto TD, Aslett M, et al. Kinetoplastid phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary innovations associated with the origins of parasitism. Curr Biol. 2016;26(2):161–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanaz ATS, Gerasimov ES, Shaw JJ, et al. Genome analysis of Endotrypanum and Porcisia spp., closest phylogenetic relatives of Leishmania, highlights the role of amastins in shaping pathogenicity. Genes. 2021;12(3):444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Nucleotide Archive. Project: PRJNA680236 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 7]; Available from: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJNA680236
   Google Scholar
• Skalický T, Dobáková E, Wheeler RJ, et al. Extensive flagellar remodeling during the complex life cycle of Paratrypanosoma, an early-branching trypanosomatid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:11757–11762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Nucleotide Archive. Project: PRJNA414522 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 9]. Available from: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJNA414522
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, et al. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, et al. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–3048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. ArXiv. 2013;1303:3997v.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesh C, Stevens GJ, Xie P, et al. JBrowse 2: a modular genome browser with views of synteny and structural variation. bioRxiv. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Shultz DT. Not recognizing read name formatting -v2.5.1 #448 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 18]. Available from: https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/issues/448#issuecomment-387790927
   Google Scholar
• Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun R, Schönenberger M. Cultivation and in vitro cloning or procyclic culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Acta Trop. 1979;36(3):289–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberholzer M, Morand S, Kunz S, et al. A vector series for rapid PCR-mediated C-terminal in situ tagging of Trypanosoma brucei genes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006;145(1):117–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly S, Reed J, Kramer S, et al. Functional genomics in Trypanosoma brucei: a collection of vectors for the expression of tagged proteins from endogenous and ectopic gene loci. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007;154(1):103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field MC, Allen CL, Dhir V, et al. New approaches to the microscopic imaging of Trypanosoma brucei. Microsc Microanal. 2004;10(5):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LI, Blobel G. Identification and characterization of a nuclear pore complex protein. Cell. 1986;45(5):699–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farine L, Niemann M, Schneider A, et al. Phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis by the Kennedy pathway occurs at different sites in Trypanosoma brucei. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):16787.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolte S, Cordelières FP. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. Journal of Microscopy. 2006;224(3):213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9(1):62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Chait BT. ProFound:  an expert system for protein identification using mass spectrometric peptide mapping information. Anal Chem. 2000;72(11):2482–2489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenyö D, Eriksson J, Beavis R. Mass spectrometric protein identification using the global proteome machine. In: Fenyö D, editor. Computational biology, methods in molecular biology. Totowa NJ: Humana Press; 2010. p. 189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, et al. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(18):10037–10041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolinsky TJ, Czodrowski P, Li H, et al. PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W522–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PyMOLWiki. Color h [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 26]. Available from: https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Color_h
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg D, Schwarz E, Komaromy M, et al. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J Mol Biol. 1984;179(1):125–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos C, Dejung M, Janzen CJ, et al. The nuclear proteome of Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0181884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean S, Sunter JD, Wheeler RJ. TrypTag.org: a Trypanosome genome-wide protein localisation resource. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33(2):80–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billington K, Halliday C, Madden R, et al. Genome-wide subcellular protein map for the flagellate parasite Trypanosoma brucei. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8(3):533–547. DOI:10.1038/s41564-022-01295-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyoshi B, Gull K. Discovery of unconventional kinetochores in kinetoplastids. Cell. 2014;156(6):1247–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer EC, Florens L, Guan T, et al. Nuclear membrane proteins with potential disease links found by subtractive proteomics. Science. 2003;301(5638):1380–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsford S, Turner DJ, Obado SO, et al. High-throughput phenotyping using parallel sequencing of RNA interference targets in the African trypanosome. Genome Res. 2011;21(6):915–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarren PA, Di Marzio LA, Berazategui MA, et al. SUMO polymeric chains are involved in nuclear foci formation and chromatin organization in Trypanosoma brucei procyclic forms. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarren PA, Berazategui MA, Bayona JC, et al. Different proteomic strategies to identify genuine small Ubiquitin-like modifier targets and their modification sites in Trypanosoma brucei procyclic forms. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17(10):1413–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Archivio S, Wickstead B. Trypanosome outer kinetochore proteins suggest conservation of chromosome segregation machinery across eukaryotes. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(2):379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier TWM, Tinti M, Wheeler RJ, et al. Proteomic analysis of the cell cycle of procylic form Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Cell Proteom. 2018;17:1184–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques CA, Ridgway M, Tinti M, et al. Genome-scale RNA interference profiling of Trypanosoma brucei cell cycle progression defects. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krut O, Wiegmann K, Kashkar H, et al. Novel tumor necrosis factor-responsive mammalian neutral sphingomyelinase-3 is a C-tail-anchored protein. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(19):13784–13793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran CA, He Q, Ponnusamy S, et al. Neutral sphingomyelinase-3 Is a DNA damage and nongenotoxic stress-regulated gene that is deregulated in human malignancies. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(5):795–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piët ACA, Post M, Dekkers D, et al. Proximity ligation mapping of microcephaly associated SMPD4 shows association with components of the nuclear pore membrane. Cells. 2022;11(4);674. DOI:10.3390/cells12010011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magini P, Smits DJ, Vandervore L, et al. Loss of SMPD4 causes a developmental disorder characterized by microcephaly and congenital arthrogryposis. Am J Human Genetics. 2019;105(4):689–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits DJ, Schot R, Krusy N, et al. SMPD4 regulates mitotic nuclear envelope dynamics and its loss causes microcephaly and diabetes. Brain. 2023;awad033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann M, Wiese S, Mani J, et al. Mitochondrial outer membrane proteome of Trypanosoma brucei reveals novel factors required to maintain mitochondrial morphology. Mol Cell Proteom. 2013;12(2)515–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano T. At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(5):311–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer SK, Inchaustegui D, Queiroz R, et al. The cell cycle regulated transcriptome of Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e18425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obado SO, Rout MP, Field MC. Sending the message: specialized RNA export mechanisms in trypanosomes. Trends Parasitol. 2022;38(10):854–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada J, Phillips JL, Patel S, et al. A bimodal distribution of two distinct categories of intrinsically disordered structures with separate functions in FG nucleoporins. Mol Cell Proteom. 2010;9(10):2205–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer T, Sträßer K, Rácz A, et al. The mRNA export machinery requires the novel Sac3p-Thp1p complex to dock at the nucleoplasmic entrance of the nuclear pores. EMBO J. 2002;21:5843–5852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutzmann M, Kunze R, Stangl K, et al. Reconstitution of Nup157 and Nup145N into the Nup84 complex. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:18442–18451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li S, Zeng C, et al. Molecular architecture of the luminal ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex. Cell Res. 2020;30(6):532–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upla P, Kim SJ, Sampathkumar P, et al. Molecular architecture of the major membrane ring component of the nuclear pore complex. Structure. 2017;25(3):434–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akey CW, Singh D, Ouch C, et al. Comprehensive structure and functional adaptations of the yeast nuclear pore complex. Cell. 2022;185(2):361–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Q, Zhang B, Yuan K, et al. Electron microscopy of Chaetomium pom152 shows the assembly of ten-bead string. Cell Discov. 2018;4(1):56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim SJ, Fernandez-Martinez J, Nudelman I, et al. Integrative structure and functional anatomy of a nuclear pore complex. Nature. 2018;555(7697):475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarov AA, Padilla-Mejia NE, Field MC. Evolution and diversification of the nuclear pore complex. Biochem Soc Trans. 2021;49(4):1601–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obado SO, Field MC, Rout MP. Comparative interactomics provides evidence for functional specialization of the nuclear pore complex. Nucleus. 2017;8(4):340–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie EA, Young SA, Smith TK. Substrate specificity of the neutral sphingomyelinase from Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitology. 2019;146(5):604–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassert JFH, Jamy M, Mylnikov AP, et al. New phylogenomic analysis of the enigmatic phylum Telonemia further resolves the eukaryote tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36:757–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikhonenkov DV, Strassert JFH, Janouškovec J, et al. Predatory colponemids are the sister group to all other alveolates. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020;149:106839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanifuji G, Cenci U, Moog D, et al. Genome sequencing reveals metabolic and cellular interdependence in an amoeba-kinetoplastid symbiosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11688. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-11866-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison HG, McArthur AG, Gillin FD, et al. Genomic minimalism in the early diverging intestinal parasite giardia lamblia. Science. 2007;317(5846):1921–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field MC, Koreny L, Rout MP. Enriching the pore: splendid complexity from humble origins. Traffic. 2014;15(2):141–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujitomo T, Daigo Y, Matsuda K, et al. Critical function for nuclear envelope protein TMEM209 in human pulmonary carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2012;72(16):4110–4118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L-C, Zhang X, Baboo S, et al. Comparative membrane proteomics reveals diverse cell regulators concentrated at the nuclear envelope. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;6(9):e202301998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Huang A, Gu Y. Global profiling of plant nuclear membrane proteome in Arabidopsis. Nat Plants. 2020;6(7):838–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik P, Korfali N, Srsen V, et al. Cell-specific and lamin-dependent targeting of novel transmembrane proteins in the nuclear envelope. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:1353–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Tang X, Tian G, et al. Arabidopsis homolog of the yeast TREX-2 mRNA export complex: components and anchoring nucleoporin. Plant J. 2010;61(2):259–270. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04048.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden JM, Koreny L, Obado SO, et al. Nuclear pore complex evolution: a trypanosome Mlp analogue functions in chromosomal segregation but lacks transcriptional barrier activity. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25(9):1421–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obado SO, Stein M, Hegedűsová E, et al. Mex67 paralogs mediate division of labor in trypanosome RNA processing and export. bioRxiv. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Mosalaganti S, Obarska-Kosinska A, Siggel M, et al. AI-based structure prediction empowers integrative structural analysis of human nuclear pores. Science. 2022;376(6598):eabm9506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Mori C, Kojidani T, et al. Two distinct repeat sequences of Nup98 nucleoporins characterize dual nuclei in the binucleated ciliate Tetrahymena. Curr Biol. 2009;19(10):843–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann N, Lundin D, Poole AM. Comparative genomic evidence for a complete nuclear pore complex in the last eukaryotic common ancestor. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Fukao Y, Iwamoto M, et al. Identification and characterization of nuclear pore complex components in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2010;22:4084–4097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambekar SV, Beck JR, Mair GR. TurboID identification of evolutionarily divergent components of the nuclear pore complex in the malaria model Plasmodium berghei. mBio. 2022;13(5):e01815–22. DOI:10.1128/mbio.01815-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courjol F, Mouveaux T, Lesage K, et al. Characterization of a nuclear pore protein sheds light on the roles and composition of the Toxoplasma gondii nuclear pore complex. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:2107–2125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehrer J, Kuss C, Andres-Pons A, et al. Nuclear pore complex components in the malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothballer A, Kutay U. Poring over pores: nuclear pore complex insertion into the nuclear envelope. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;38(6):292–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters BWA, Piët ACA, Fornerod M. Generating membrane curvature at the nuclear pore: a lipid point of view. Cells. 2022;11(3);469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue AH, Domingues PF, Serpeloni M, et al.Proteomics uncovers novel components of an interactive protein network supporting RNA export in Trypanosomes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2022;21:100208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos C, Dejung M, Wehman AM, et al. Trypanosomes can initiate nuclear export co-transcriptionally. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:266–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S. Nuclear mRNA maturation and mRNA export control: from trypanosomes to opisthokonts. Parasitology. 2021;148(10):1196–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar