The relationship between intrapreneurial capabilities and development in high-tech SMEs in China

References

• Achtenhagen, L., Naldi, L., & Melin, L. (2010). ‘Business growth’—Do practitioners and scholars really talk about the same thing? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adachi, T., & Hisada, T. (2017). Gender differences in entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship: An empirical analysis. Small Business Economics, 48(3), 447–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9793-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alayo, M., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2022). Innovation and internationalization in family SMEs: Analyzing the role of family involvement. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambos, T. C., & Tatarinov, K. (2022). Building responsible innovation in international organizations through intrapreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 59(1), 92–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. S., & Eshima, Y. (2013). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2003). Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000310461187
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearden, W. O. (1983). Profiling consumers who register complaints against auto repair services. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 17(2), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1983.tb00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berraies, S., & Abidine, S. (2019). Do leadership styles promote ambidextrous innovation? Case of knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 836–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccieri, D., Javalgi, R. G., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities. International Business Review, 29(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butkouskaya, V., Llonch-Andreu, J., & Alarcon-Del-Amo, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation (EO), integrated marketing communications (IMC), and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Gender gap and inter-country context. Sustainability, 12(17), 7159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Wang, X., & Cui, A. P. (2019). Solving the innovation problem in state-owned firms: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and high-commitment HR practices. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsaro, D., Cantù, C., & Tunisini, A. (2012). Actors’ heterogeneity in innovation networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718773181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers, F. (2020). Masters of disasters? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis. Journal of Business Research, 116, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkel, E., Heil, S., Hengstler, M., & Wirth, H. (2017). Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? Technovation, 60–61, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdil, T. S., & Özdemir, O. (2016). The determinants of relationship between marketing mix strategy and drivers of export performance in foreign markets: An application on Turkish clothing industry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.067
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Liang, B. (2021). The evolution of innovation mode of small and medium technology enterprises under the synergy of opportunity identification and ambidextrous strategy combinations. Chinese Journal of Management, 18(6), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2021.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (1996). Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science, 7(5), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O. (1998). Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00067-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., Heaton, S., & Urbano, D. (2021). Building universities’ intrapreneurial capabilities in the digital era: The role and impacts of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Technovation, 99, 102139SI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Halkos, G. E., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2009). Economic efficiency and growth in the EU enlargement. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(6), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, B., & Samuelsson, M. (2021). Business planning by intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs under environmental uncertainty and institutional pressure. Technovation, 99, 102124SI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L. Y., Yang Lin, S. M., & Hsieh, Y. J. (2021). Cultivation of intrapreneurship: A framework and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Chen, C. (2010). The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation. Technovation, 30(7–8), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innofund. (2016). The definition of technology-based small and medium-sized enterprises. http://www.innofund.gov.cn/zxqyfw/wtjd/201603/df8feddbf80540a191157d349775ae9f.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00279.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Jr., D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JaeDo, S. (2018). Drone market expansion and success factors of DJI. Korean Journal of Converging Humanities, 6(4), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.14729/converging.k.2018.6.4.55
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klofsten, M., Urbano, D., & Heaton, S. (2021). Managing intrapreneurial capabilities: An overview. Technovation, 99, 102177SI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship: Exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00278.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, H., Do, N. K., & Le, P. B. (2019). Arousing a positive climate for knowledge sharing through moral lens: The mediating roles of knowledge-centered and collaborative culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1586–1604. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2019-0201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, 38(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S., Liu, Z., & Zhang, S. (2018). Technology innovation ambidexterity, business model ambidexterity, and firm performance in Chinese high-tech firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 26(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2018.1549954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B. W., & Chen, J. S. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: A study of technology intensive firms. R and D Management, 35(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., & Chang, C. (2015). A patent-based study of the relationships among technological portfolio, ambidextrous innovation, and firm performance. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 27(10), 1193–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1061119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Wang, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation, new product development and firm performance: The moderating role of legitimacy in Chinese high-tech SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, C. S., Lopes, C., Braga, V., Ratten, V., & Santos, G. (2021). Intuition and rationality in intrapreneurship and innovation outputs: The case of health professionals in primary health care. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00761-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morandi Stagni, R., Fosfuri, A., & Santaló, J. (2021). A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush: Technology search strategies and competition due to import penetration. Strategic Management Journal, 42(8), 1516–1544. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation. South-Western Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2020). 2020 China statistical yearbook. https://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. V. (2009). Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerlemans, L. A. G., Knoben, J., & Pretorius, M. W. (2013). Alliance portfolio diversity, radical and incremental innovation: The moderating role of technology management. Technovation, 33(6–7), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, J., Gupta, M., & Hassan, Y. (2021). Intrapreneurship to engage employees: Role of psychological capital. Management Decision, 59(6), 1525–1545. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2019-0825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peneder, M. (2008). The problem of private under-investment in innovation: A policy mind map. Technovation, 28(8), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring (1st ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research – Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizos, V., Behrens, A., van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., & Topi, C. (2016). Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8(11), 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2018). Knowledge context, learning and innovation: An integrating framework. Industry and Innovation, 25(4), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1414744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruttan, W. V. (2001). Technology growth and development: An induced innovation perspective. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruttan, W. V. (2006). Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, T., Miao, X., Liu, H., & Xiaohua, X. (2021). Research on the process mechanism of disruptive innovation under resource constraints. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 1, 43–45. https://doi.org/10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2021.01.006
   Google Scholar
• State Council of the PRC. (2011). The issuance of the standard regulations for the classification of SMEs. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-07/04/content_1898747.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Kulve, H., Boon, W., Konrad, K., & Schuitmaker, T. J. (2018). Influencing the direction of innovation processes: The shadow of authorities in demand articulation. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, F. (2021). When and how group diversity facilitate innovativeness? The roles of knowledge heterogeneity and governance. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.2004950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C., & Tseng, C. (2019). Corporate entrepreneurship as a strategic approach for internal innovation performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2018-0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbano, D., Alvarez, C., & Turró, A. (2013). Organizational resources and intrapreneurial activities: An international study. Management Decision, 51(4), 854–870. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311326617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to Co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2111–2136. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 77–140). JAI Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Dang, X., & Li, Q. (2017). Study on the construction and operation mechanism of innovation and entrepreneurship platform of Xi’an airlines SMEs based on grounded theory. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 34(16), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2017030696
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, H. E., Murtic, A., Klofsten, M., Zander, U., & Richtnér, A. (2021). Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective. Technovation, 99, 102130SI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. X., Kimbu, A. N., Lin, P., & Ngoasong, M. Z. (2020). Guanxi influences on women intrapreneurship. Tourism Management, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Jr., X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar