Stray aesthetic in the cinema of Andrea Arnold

References

• Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. 2016. Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Augé, M. 1995. Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J. M. 2009. The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bavidge, J. 2016. “Brontё Soundscapes: The Role of Soundtracks in Adaptations of Wuthering Heights in Brontё Heritage Discourses.” In English Topographies in Literature and Culture, edited by I. Habermann and D. Keller, 116–18. Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. 1980. “Why Look at Animals?” In About Looking, 3–28. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, L. 2016. “A Phenomenology of Girlhood: Being Mia in Fish Tank.” In International Cinema and the Girl, edited by F. Handyside and K. T. Jones, 75–84. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2012. “Precarious Life, Vulnerability, and the Ethics of Cohabitation.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26 (2): 134–151. doi:10.5325/jspecphil.26.2.0134.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2012. “Not Symbiosis, Not Now: Why Anthropogenic Change is Not Really Human.” Oxford Literary Review 34 (2): 185–209. doi:10.3366/olr.2012.0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. 2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creed, B. 2017. Stray: Human-Animal Ethics in the Anthropocene. Sydney: Power Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creed, B. 2018. “Entangled Looking: The Crisis of the Animal.” Artlink, March 1. https://www.artlink.com.au/articles/4662/entangled-looking-the-crisis-of-the-animal/.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillet, B., and T. Puri. 2013. “Left-Over Spaces: The Cinema of the Dardenne Brothers.” Film-Philosophy 17 (1): 367–382. doi:10.3366/film.2013.0021.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K. 2018. “Second Glance at the Panther, Or: What Does It Mean to Read Zoopoetically ?” Frame 31 (1): 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K., and E. Hoffmann. 2018. “Introduction: What is Zoopoetics?” In What is Zoopoetics?, edited by K. Driscoll and E. Hoffmann, 1–13. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2005. Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2015. “Sensing National Spaces: Representing the Mundane in English Film and Television.” In European Cinema and Television, edited by I. Bondebjerg, E. N. Redvall, and A. Higson, 58–77. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. 2016. The Weird and the Eerie. London: Repeater Books, ebook.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, D. 2020. New Realism: Contemporary British Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M., and O. Goriunova. 2019. Bleak Joys: Aesthetics of Ecology and Impossibility. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorfinkel, E. 2016. “Exhausted Drift: Austerity, Dispossession and the Politics of Slow in Kelly Reichardt’s Meek’s Cutoff.” In Slow Cinema, edited by T. de Luca and J. N. Barradas, 123–136. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gritten, D. 2009. “Andrea Arnold: ‘I Wish Cinema Could Be Braver’.” The Telegraph. August 28, 2009. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/starsandstories/6093303/Andrea-Arnold-I-wish-cinema-could-be-braver.html.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, C., and A. O’Brien. 2020. “Cinema’s Natural Aesthetics: Environments and Perspectives in Contemporary Film Theory.” Screen 61 (2): 272–279. doi:10.1093/screen/hjaa014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, L. 2015. “Edgelands Aesthetics: Exploring the Liminal in Andrea Arnold’s Fish Tank (2009).” Writing Visual Culture 6: 65–89.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. 2014. “Written on the Body: A Reasonable Exit?” Feminist Media Studies 14 (3): 470–484. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.737345.
   Google Scholar
• Horeck, T. 2011. “A ‘Passion for the Real’: Sex, Affect and Performance in the Films of Andrea Arnold.” In The New Extremism in Cinema: From France to Europe, edited by T. Horeck and T. Kendall, 169–179. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ince, K. 2017. The Body and the Screen: Female Subjectivities in Contemporary Women’s Cinema. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. 2016. “On the Maternal ‘Creaturely’ Cinema of Andrea Arnold.” Journal of British Cinema and Television 13 (1): 160–176. doi:10.3366/jbctv.2016.0305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta, M., and E. Atasoy. 2022. “Against Anthropocentrism: A Stray’s Quest in Diane Cook’s The New Wilderness.” Critique - Studies in Contemporary Fiction (online): 1–14. doi:10.1080/00111619.2022.2144109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landreville, J. 2019. “Alternative Ethics for Ecocinema: The Tree of Life and Post-Continuity Aesthetics.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 17 (1): 99–119. doi:10.1080/17400309.2019.1563365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. 2016. “Nature and the Non-Human in Andrea Arnold’s Wuthering Heights.” Journal of British Cinema and Television 13 (1): 177–194. doi:10.3366/jbctv.2016.0306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S. 2013. “The Ecocinema Experience.” In Ecocinema Theory and Practice, edited by S. Rust, S. Monani, and S. Cubitt, 17–42. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, L. 2000. The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, S. 2016. Political Animals: The New Feminist Cinema. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, S. 2009. “Animal Farm’s Lessons for Literary (And) Animal Studies.” Humanimalia 1 (1): 24–39. doi:10.52537/humanimalia.10115.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, L. 2014a. “Animal Worlds: Denis Côté’s Bestiaire (2012).” Studies in French Cinema 14 (3): 195–215. doi:10.1080/14715880.2014.949457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, L. 2014b. “Beyond the Human Body: Claire Denis’s Ecologies.” Alphaville 7 (7): 94–111. doi:10.33178/alpha.7.06.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, L. 2015. “Screen Animals Dossier: Introduction.” Screen 56 (1): 81–87. doi:10.1093/screen/hjv007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, L. 2019. Animal Worlds: Film, Philosophy and Time. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2009. Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, L. 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (3): 6–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6.
   Google Scholar
• Nwonka, C. J. 2014. “‘You’re What’s Wrong with Me’: Fish Tank, The Selfish Giant and the Language of Contemporary British Social Realism.” New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film 12 (3): 205–223. doi:10.1386/ncin.12.3.205_1.
   Google Scholar
• Nwonka, C. J. 2017. “Estate of the Nation: Social Housing as Cultural Verisimilitude in British Social Realism.” In Filmurbia, edited by D. Forrest, G. Harper, and J. Rayner, 65–78. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pick, A. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puysségur, M. 2020. “Space, Gender, and Identity in Sciamma’s Girlhood and Arnold’s Fish Tank.” Girlhood Studies 13 (1): 117–132. doi:10.3167/ghs.2020.130109.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, A. 2011. “Love Will Tear Us Apart.” Sight & Sound 21: 34–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Río, E. D. 2008. Deleuze and the Cinemas of Performance: Powers of Affection. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segarra, M. 2021. “Hélène Cixous’s Creaturely Poethics.” Word and Text XI: 55–67. doi:10.51865/JLSL.2021.04.
   Google Scholar
• Shoard, M. 2002. “Edgelands.” In Remaking the Landscape: The Changing Face of Britain, edited by J. Jenkins, 117–146. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, D. 1995. Geographies of Exclusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2010. “Andrea Arnold, Fish Tank.” Filmmaker Magazine. https://filmmakermagazine.com/1403-andrea-arnold-fish-tank/.
   Google Scholar
• Sobchack, V. 1992. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornham, S. 2016. “‘Not a Country at All’: Landscape and Wuthering Heights.” Journal of British Cinema and Television 13 (1): 214–231. doi:10.3366/jbctv.2016.0308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willoquet-Maricondi, P., ed. 2010. Framing the World: Explorations in Ecocriticism and Film. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar