850
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Translation and validation of a Swedish version of the BODY-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for weight loss and body contouring surgery

, , , &
Pages 348-352 | Received 11 Feb 2021, Accepted 11 Jul 2021, Published online: 01 Aug 2021

References

  • Song AY, Jean RD, Hurwitz DJ, et al. A classification of contour deformities after bariatric weight loss: the Pittsburgh Rating Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(5):1535.
  • Biörserud C, Olbers T, Fagevik Olsén M. Patients’ experience of surplus skin after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2011;21(3):273–277.
  • Kitzinger HB, Abayev S, Pittermann A, et al. After massive weight loss: patients’ expectations of body contouring surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22(4):544–548.
  • Biörserud C, Olbers T, Staalesen T, et al. Understanding excess skin in postbariatric patients: objective measurements and subjective experiences. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(7):1410–1417.
  • Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, et al. Assessing outcomes in body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(4):645–654.
  • Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Kaur M, et al. Further psychometric validation of the BODY-Q: ability to detect change following bariatric surgery weight gain and loss. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):227.
  • Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R, et al. Translation and cultural adaptation of the BODY-Q into Italian. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(2):326e.
  • Hermann N, Klassen A, Luketina R, et al. German linguistic validation of the BODY-Q: standardised PRO instrument after bariatric and body contouring surgery. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2019;51(4):255–261.
  • Poulsen L, Rose M, Klassen A, et al. Danish translation and linguistic validation of the BODY-Q: a description of the process. Eur J Plast Surg. 2017;40(1):29–38.
  • Repo JP, Homsy P, Uimonen MM, et al. Validation of the Finnish version of the BODY-Q patient-reported outcome instrument among patients who underwent abdominoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(6):933–940.
  • Rillon P, Château F, Klassen A, et al. French translation and linguistic validation of a new Patient Reported Outcome instrument: the BODY-Q: a description of the process. Psychiatr Danub. 2019;31(Suppl 3):406–410.
  • Iglesias M, Butron P, Abarca L, et al. An anthropometric classification of body contour deformities after massive weight loss. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65(2):129–134.
  • Staalesen T, Fagevik Olsén M, Elander A. Experience of excess skin and desire for body contouring surgery in post-bariatric patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1632–1644.
  • Staalesen T, Olbers T, Dahlgren J, et al. Development of excess skin and request for body-contouring surgery in postbariatric adolescents. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):627–636.
  • Ockell J, Elander A, Staalesen T, et al. Evaluation of excess skin in Swedish adults 18–59 years of age. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(2):99–104.
  • Biörserud C, Nielsen C, Staalesen T, et al. Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ): a reliable questionnaire to assess the experience of excessive skin after weight loss. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(1):50–59.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
  • Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research London. England: Chapman and Hall; 1991. p. 404.