ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction is not associated with high complication rate as before: a Meta-analysis

References

• Trayes KP, Cokenakes SEH. Breast Cancer Treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2021 Aug 1;104(2):171–178. PMID: 34383430.
   Google Scholar
• Czajka ML, Pfeifer C. Breast cancer surgery. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; September 14, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell AS, Taylor EM. Recent advances in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):421e–432e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco N, Catanuto G. More evidence for implant-based breast reconstruction. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):174–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Louw RP, Nahabedian MY. Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S–59S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onesti MG, Di Taranto G, Ribuffo D, et al. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction and skin reduction mastectomy: expanding the indications for subcutaneous reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(4):673–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters J, Sterne J, Schwarz AG, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2011;343(7818):302–307.
   Google Scholar
• Viezel-Mathieu A, Alnaif N, Aljerian A, et al. Acellular dermal matrix-sparing direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction: a comparative study including cost analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(2):139–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momeni A, Remington AC, Wan DC, et al. A Matched-Pair analysis of prepectoral with subpectoral breast reconstruction: is there a difference in postoperative complication rate? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(4):801–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila A, Bartholomew AJ, Sosin M, et al. Acute postoperative complications in prepectoral versus subpectoral reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(6):715e–720e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker BG, Irri R, MacCallum V, et al. A prospective comparison of short-term outcomes of subpectoral and prepectoral strattice-based immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(5):1077–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormer BA, Valmadrid AC, Ganesh Kumar N, et al. Reducing expansion visits in immediate Implant-Based breast reconstruction: a comparative study of prepectoral and subpectoral expander placement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(2):276–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott CJ, Persing SM, Pronovost M, et al. Impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2899–2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribuffo D, Berna G, De Vita R, et al. Dual-Plane retro-pectoral versus pre-pectoral DTI breast reconstruction: an Italian multicenter experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(1):51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komorowska-Timek E, Merrifield B, Turfe Z, et al. Subcutaneous prosthetic breast reconstructions following skin reduction mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(1):e2078.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thangarajah F, Treeter T, Krug B, et al. Comparison of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective hospital-based cohort study. Breast Care. 2019;14(6):382–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraenzlin F, Darrach H, Khavanin N, et al. Tissue expander-based breast reconstruction in the prepectoral versus subpectoral plane: an analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;86(1):19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo GG, Zingaretti N, Kiprianidis I, et al. Quality of life and early functional evaluation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a comparative study between prepectoral versus dual-plane reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(4):344–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walia GS, Aston J, Bello R, et al. Prepectoral versus subpectoral tissue expander placement: a clinical and quality of life outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(4):e1731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim JH, Hong SE. A comparative analysis between subpectoral versus prepectoral single stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Medicina. 2020;56(10):537.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Park E, Lee JH, et al. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(3):2520–2529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banuelos J, Abu-Ghname A, Vyas K, et al. Should obesity be considered a contraindication for prepectoral breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(3):619–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JY, Kim CW, Lee JW, et al. Considerations for patient selection: prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(6):550–557.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nealon KP, Weitzman RE, Sobti N, et al. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: safety outcome endpoints and delineation of risk factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(5):898e–908e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland-Halperin LR, Yemc L, Emery E, et al. Evaluating postoperative narcotic use in prepectoral versus dual-plane breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(2):e2082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nahabedian MY, Cocilovo C. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: a comparison between prepectoral and partial subpectoral techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S–30S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandarana MN, Jafferbhoy S, Marla S, et al. Acellular dermal matrix in implant-based immediate breast reconstructions: a comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral approach. Gland Surg. 2018;7(Suppl 1):S64–S69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akyurek M, Dowlatshahi S, Quinlan RM. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with latissimus flap: prepectoral versus subpectoral approach. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(3):501–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker NJ, Park JG, Maus JC, et al. Prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction in high-body mass index patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87(2):136–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobti N, Weitzman RE, Nealon KP, et al. Evaluation of capsular contracture following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique OJ, Kapoor T, Banuelos J, et al. Single-stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: a comparison between subpectoral versus prepectoral implant placement. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(4):361–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique OJ, Banuelos J, Abu-Ghname A, et al. Surgical outcomes of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in young women. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(3):e2119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel AA, Borrelli MR, Cai L, et al. Comparing prepectoral versus subpectoral tissue expander placement outcomes in delayed-immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(5S):S329–S335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirhaidari SJ, Azouz V, Wagner DS. Prepectoral versus subpectoral direct to implant immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(3):263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh YC, Kim JK, Kim NR, et al. A comparative study of pre- or subpectoral expander position with the fenestrated acellular dermal matrix anterior coverage, on drainage volume and seroma formation after non-nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(9):2237–2243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salibian AA, Frey JD, Karp NS. Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2019;8(1):11–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storm-Dickerson T, Sigalove N. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: the breast surgeon's perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):43S–48S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, et al. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(1):44–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headon H, Kasem A, Manson A, et al. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: a prospective observational study in a single Centre. Surg Oncol. 2016;25(2):104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hou J, Li Z, et al. Efficacy of acellular dermal matrix in capsular contracture of implant-based breast reconstruction: a single-arm meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(3):735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim A, Jung JH, Choi YL, et al. Capsule biopsy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) to predict future capsular contracture in two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(9):1576–1606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namnoum JD. Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):387–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram D, Rainer C, Niederegger H, et al. Cellular and molecular composition of fibrous capsules formed around silicone breast implants with special focus on local immune reactions. J Autoimmun. 2004;23(1):81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiert AE, Boyce M, Sorg H. Capsular contracture by silicone breast implants: possible causes, biocompatibility, and prophylactic strategies. Med Devices. 2013;6:211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira VJ, D'Acampora A, Neves FS, et al. Capsular contracture in silicone breast implants: Insights from rat models. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2016;88(3):1459–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo YL, Jou IM, Jeng SF, et al. Hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibrosis for the development of breast capsular contracture. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyrberg DL, Bille C, Gunnarsson GL, et al. Breast animation deformity. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(1):7–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nigro LC, Blanchet NP. Animation deformity in postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(7):e1407.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lentz R, Alcon A, Sbitany H. Correction of animation deformity with subpectoral to prepectoral implant exchange. Gland Surg. 2019;8(1):75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel KM, Hill LM, Gatti ME, et al. Management of massive mastectomy skin flap necrosis following autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(2):139–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Deventer PV, Graewe FR. The blood supply of the breast revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(5):1388–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson SA, Jeevaratnam JA, Agrawal A, et al. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer. 2017;9:141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3):320e–326e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear SL, Howard MA, Boehmler JH, et al. The infected or exposed breast implant: management and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(6):1634–1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JA, Chung CU, Fischer JP, et al. Wound healing complications after autologous breast reconstruction: a model to predict risk. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(4):531–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar