1,130
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The effect of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction on patient satisfaction with outcome and quality of life after five years – a case-control study

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 263-270 | Received 26 Oct 2021, Accepted 29 Mar 2022, Published online: 15 Apr 2022

References

  • Unukovych D, Gumuscu R, Warnberg F, et al. Breast reconstruction patterns from a Swedish Nation-Wide Survey. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(10):1867–1873.
  • Chevray PM. Timing of breast reconstruction: immediate versus delayed. Cancer J. 2008;14(4):223–229.
  • Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL, et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast. 2018;37:72–79.
  • Heimes AS, Stewen K, Hasenburg A. Psychosocial aspects of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. Breast Care. 2017;12(6):374–377.
  • D'Souza N, Darmanin G, Fedorowicz Z. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD008674.
  • Sullivan SR, Fletcher DRD, Isom CD, et al. True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(1):19–28.
  • Metcalfe KA, Semple J, Quan ML, et al. Changes in psychosocial functioning 1 year after mastectomy alone, delayed breast reconstruction, or immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):233–241.
  • Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):254–266.
  • Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT 3rd, et al. Risk analysis of early implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 14,585 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):983–990.
  • Colakoglu S, Khansa I, Curtis MS, et al. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1428–1436.
  • Gopie JP, Timman R, Hilhorst MT, et al. The short-term psychological impact of complications after breast reconstruction. Psychooncology. 2013;22(2):290–298.
  • Winters ZE, Haviland J, Balta V, et al. Integration of patient-reported outcome measures with key clinical outcomes after immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and adjuvant treatment. Br J Surg. 2012;100(2):240–251.
  • Timman R, Gopie JP, Brinkman JN, et al. Most women recover from psychological distress after postoperative complications following implant or DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a prospective long-term follow-up study. PLOS One. 2017;12(3):e0174455.
  • Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(1):46–54.
  • Shaterian A, Gandy J, Lalezari S, et al. Patient race and provider predict patient satisfaction following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. World J Plast Surg. 2016;5(2):114–123.
  • Browne JP, Jeevan R, Gulliver-Clarke C, et al. The association between complications and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(18):3460–3467.
  • Menez T, Michot A, Tamburino S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction, a long-term retrospective study. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2018;63(2):126–133.
  • Lu SM, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, et al. The impact of complications on function, health, and satisfaction following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: a prospective evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(5):682–692.
  • Higgins KS, Gillis J, Williams JG, et al. Women's experiences with flap failure after autologous breast reconstruction: a qualitative analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78(5):521–525.
  • Mahoney B, Walklet E, Bradley E, et al. Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: qualitative study. BJS Open. 2020;4(3):380–390.
  • Weick L, Ericson A, Sandman L, et al. Patient experience of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Care Women Int. 2021;1–19.
  • Hallberg H, Lewin R, Elander A, et al. TIGR® matrix surgical mesh – a two-year follow-up study and complication analysis in 65 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018;52(4):253–258.
  • Hallberg H, Lewin R, Søfteland MB, et al. Complications, long-term outcome and quality of life following Surgisis® and muscle-covered implants in immediate breast reconstruction: a case-control study with a 6-year follow-up. Eur J Plast Surg. 2019;42(1):33–42.
  • Nationellt vårdprogram bröstcancer Stockholm Regionala cancercentrum i samverkan; 2020.
  • Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–353.
  • Mendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR. Body-Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults. J Pers Assess. 2001;76(1):90–106.
  • Erling A, Hwang C. Body-esteem in Swedish 10-year-old children. Percept Mot Skills. 2004;99(2):437–444.
  • Zaied S, Ben Fatma L, Laadhari A, et al. Study of sexuality among Tunisian women in remission from non-metastatic breast cancer, about 100 women. Bull Cancer. 2013;100(7–8):689–696.
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.
  • Saboonchi F, Petersson LM, Wennman-Larsen A, et al. Changes in caseness of anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients during the first year following surgery: patterns of transiency and severity of the distress response. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(6):598–604.
  • Saboonchi F, Wennman-Larsen A, Alexanderson K, et al. Examination of the construct validity of the Swedish version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in breast cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2849–2856.
  • Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, et al. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.
  • Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, et al. Breast cancer and reconstruction: Normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1046e–1055e.
  • Falk Dahl CA, Reinertsen KV, Nesvold IL, et al. A study of body image in long-term breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2010;116(15):3549–3557.
  • Fingeret MC, Nipomnick S, Guindani M, et al. Body image screening for cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery. Psychooncology. 2014;23(8):898–905.
  • Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, et al. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(7):579–594.
  • Brandao T, Schulz MS, Matos PM. Psychological adjustment after breast cancer: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Psychooncology. 2017;26(7):917–926.
  • Paterson CL, Lengacher CA, Donovan KA, et al. Body image in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(1):E39–E58.
  • Davis C, Tami P, Ramsay D, et al. Body image in older breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2020;29(5):823–832.
  • Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(3):1060–1068.
  • Bai L, Arver B, Johansson H, et al. Body image problems in women with and without breast cancer 6–20 years after bilateral risk-reducing surgery – a prospective follow-up study. Breast. 2019;44:120–127.
  • Akobeng AK. Understanding type I and type II errors, statistical power and sample size. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(6):605–609.
  • Voineskos SH, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Giving meaning to differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference for breast reconstruction patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(1):11e–20e.
  • Santanelli F, Longo B, Sorotos M, et al. Flap survival of skin-sparing mastectomy type IV: a retrospective cohort study of 75 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):981–989.