Evaluation of an assessment scale for aesthetic outcome in breast reconstructions based on digital photos in both 2D and 3D format

References

• Cancer NQRfB. Immediate reconstructions at mastectomy [internet]. Stockholm: National Quality Register for Breast Cancer; 2021. https://statistik.incanet.se/brostcancer/
   Google Scholar
• Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL, et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast. 2018;37:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Freijs C, Klein HJ, et al. Patients with abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction a decade after surgery: a comprehensive long-term follow-up study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(9):1301–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser NJ, Damen THC, Timman R, et al. Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(1):26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindegren A, Halle M, Docherty Skogh AC, et al. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the irradiated breast: a comparative study of DIEP and latissimus dorsi flap outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huis In 't Veld EA, Long C, Sue GR, et al. Analysis of aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction after delayed-immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(5S Suppl 5):S303–S307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R, et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(3):686–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teotia SS, Alford JA, Kadakia Y, et al. Crowdsourced assessment of aesthetic outcomes after breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(3):570–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltahir Y, Bosma E, Teixeira N, et al. Satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes of breast reconstruction: investigations into the correlation between the patients’ Breast-Q outcome and the judgment of panels. JPRAS Open. 2020;24:60–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maass SW, Bagher S, Hofer SO, et al. Systematic review: aesthetic assessment of breast reconstruction outcomes by healthcare professionals. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4305–4316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connell RL, Di Micco R, Khabra K, et al. Comparison of immediate versus delayed DIEP flap reconstruction in women who require postmastectomy radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3):594–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlback C, Ringberg A, Manjer J. Aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery assessed by three evaluation modalities in relation to health-related quality of life. Br J Surg. 2019;106(1):90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallroth L, Velander P, Klasson S. A short-term comparison of expander prosthesis and DIEP flap in breast reconstructions: a prospective randomized study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(6):1193–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, REDCap Consortium, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga DF, Neto MS, Garcia EB, et al. Evaluations of the aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with the late pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(5):515–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godden AR, Wood SH, James SE, et al. A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(9):1580–1587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahm J, Edsander-Nord A, Jurell G, et al. No differences in aesthetic outcome or patient satisfaction between anatomically shaped and round expandable implants in bilateral breast reconstructions: a randomized study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1419–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosmuller DGM, Maal TJ, Prahl C, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional assessment methods of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients: do the assessment methods measure the same outcome? J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(8):1220–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duraes EFR, Schwarz GS, de Sousa JB, et al. Factors influencing the aesthetic outcome and quality of life after breast reconstruction: a cross-sectional study. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(5):494–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I . Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1702–1709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1710–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar