The decision to participate in mediation and individual factors: the role of moral foundations and their relation to restorative and retributive orientations

References

• Adriaenssen, A. & Aertsen, I. (2015). Punitive attitudes: towards an operationalization to measure individual punitivity in a multidimensional way. European Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 92–112. doi: 10.1177/1477370814535376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aertsen, I., Mackay, R., Pelikan, C., Willemsens, J. & Wright, M. (2004). Rebuilding community connections – mediation and restorative justice in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aertsen, I. & Peters, T. (1998). Mediation for reparation: the victim’s perspective. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 6(2), 106–124. doi: 10.1163/157181798X00139
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: communities, victims and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 768–813. doi: 10.1177/0002764298041006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazemore, G. & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime and Delinquency, 41(3), 296–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conseil de l’Europe. (2000). Médiation en matière pénale. Recommandation N° R(99)19, adoptée par le Comité des Ministres du Conseil de l’Europe le 15 septembre 1999 et exposé des motifs. Strasbourg: Editions du Conseil de l’Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Cunneen, C. & Hoyle, C. (2010). Debating restorative justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1999, draft version). Revisiting the relationship between retributive and restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (eds.), Restorative justice: From philosophy to practice. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2005). Punishment and the morality of law. In E. Claes, R. Foqué & T. Peters (eds.), Punishment, restorative justice and the morality of law (pp. 121–143). Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, R. A. (2002). Restorative punishment and punitive restoration. In L. Walgrave (ed.), Restorative justice and the law (pp. 82–99). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21, 105–114. doi: 10.1177/0038038587021001008
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, A. P. (1998). Human sociality. International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships Bulletin, 14(2), 4–9. www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fiske/relmodov.htm (accessed 16 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J. & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. doi: 10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S. & Ditto, P. (2011). Mapping the Moral Domain. National Institute of Health (NIH) Public Access Author Manuscript, 1–39, Final edited form published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. doi: 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2007, draft version). The moral mind: how five sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence & S. Stich (eds.), The innate mind (vol. 3).
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. & Huby, M. (2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(4), 382–386. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, C., Graham, J. & Haidt, J. (2009). The end of equipotentiality: a moral foundations approach to ideology – attitude links and cognitive complexity. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 20, 172–176. doi: 10.1080/10478400903088882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice (vol. 1). Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, A. & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, J. & Philpott, D. (2014). Restorative justice and reconciliation: twin frameworks for peacebuilding. In J. Llewellyn & D. Philpott (eds.), Restorative justice, reconciliation and peacebuilding (pp. 14–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (1996). The evolution of restorative justice in Britain. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4, 21–43. doi: 10.1007/BF02736712
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. & Smith, D. (1998). Portia and persephone revisited: thinking about feeling in criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 2(1), 5–27. doi: 10.1177/1362480698002001001
   Google Scholar
• Mattinson, J. & Mirrlees-Black, C. (2000). Attitudes to crime and criminal justice: findings from the 1998 British crime survey. Home Office Research Study 200. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• McNeeley, S. & Warner, J. (2015). Replication in criminology: a necessary practice. European Journal of Criminology, 12(5), 581–597. doi: 10.1177/1477370815578197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkel-Meadow, C. (2010). Compromise, negotiation, and morality. Negotiation Journal, 26, 483–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M. & Feather, N. T. (2012). Retribution and restoration as general orientations towards justice. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 255–275. doi: 10.1002/per.831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulou, M. (2001). The role of vignettes in the research of emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 6(1), 50–62. doi: 10.1080/13632750100507655
   Google Scholar
• Saulnier, A., Lutchman, K. & Sivasubramaniam, D. (2012). Laboratory experiments: a meaningful contribution to restorative justice research? Critical Criminology, 20, 99–115. doi: 10.1007/s10612-011-9152-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., Levine, R., Markus, H. & Miller, P. (2006). The cultural psychology of development: one mind, many mentalities. In W. Damon (ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 716–792). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shweder, R. A., Much, N., Park, L. & Mahapatra, M. M. (2003). The ‘big three’ of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the ‘big three’ explanations of suffering. In R. A. Shweder (ed.), Why do men barbecue?: Recipes for cultural psychology (pp. 119–169). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strelan, P., Feather, N. & McKee, I. (2008). Justice and forgiveness: experimental evidence for compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1538–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. (2001). The handbook of victim offender mediation: an essential guide to practice and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ness, D. (2002). Creating restorative systems. In L. Walgrave (ed.), Restorative justice and the Law (pp. 130–149). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ness, D., Morris, A. & Maxwell, G. (2001). Introducing restorative justice. In A. Morris & G. Maxwell (eds.), Restorative justice for juveniles: conferencing, mediation and circles (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, L. (2003). Imposing restoration instead of inflicting pain: reflections on the judicial reaction to crime. In A. Von Hirsch, J. Roberts, A. E. Bottoms, K. Roach & M. Schiff (eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice: competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 61–78). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, L. (2008). Restorative justice, self-interest and responsible citizenship. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, L., Aertsen, I., Parmentier, S., Vanfraechem, I & Zinsstag, E. (2013). Why restorative justice matters for criminology. Restorative Justice: An International Journal, 1(2), 159–167. doi: 10.5235/20504721.1.2.159
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T. & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375–389. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T. & Platow, M. J. (2010). Justice through consensus: shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 909–930. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witvliet, C., Worthington, E., Root, L., Sato, A., Ludwig, T. & Exline, J. (2008). Retributive justice, restorative justice, and forgiveness: an experimental psychophysiology analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 10–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedner, L. (1994). Reparation and retribution: are they reconcilable? The Modern Law Review, 57(2), 228–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01934.x
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (2005). Changing lenses. Pennsylvania: Herald Press.
   Google Scholar