Applying the study of religions in the security domain: knowledge, skills, and collaboration

References

• APPG RE. 2016. Improving Religious Literacy: A Contribution to the Debate. All Party Parliamentary Group on Religious Education. Accessed http://www.reonline.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/APPG-on-RE-Improving-Religious-Literacy-full-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anthropologi.Info. 2007. Accessed https://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2007/protests_against_british_research_counci.
   Google Scholar
• ASA. 2007. “Minutes of the Annual General Meeting of the Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonwealth.” Accessed 12 April 2007. https://www.theasa.org/downloads/minutes/abm/abm07minutes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baker-Beall, C., C. Heath-Kelly, and L. Jarvis, edited by. 2015. Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, E. 2014. “How to Be Informed about Minority Religions Celebrating Inform on Its Twenty-Fifth Anniversary: A Forum Interview.” World Religions and Spirituality. Accessed https://wrldrels.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Interview-with-Eileen-Barker.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barkun, M. 2002. “Project Megiddo, the FBI and the Academic Community.” In Millennial Violence: Past, Present and Future, edited by J. Kaplan, 97–108. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Bramadat, P. 2014. “The Public, the Political, and the Possible: Religion and Radicalization in Canada and Beyond.” In Religious Radicalization and Securitization in Canada and Beyond, edited by P. Bramadat and L. Dawson, 3–33. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bramadat, P., and L. Dawson. 2014. “Conclusion.” In Religious Radicalization and Securitization in Canada and Beyond, edited by P. Bramadat and L. Dawson, 301–304. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., D. Bainton, N. Lendvai, and P. Stubbs. 2015. Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• CREST. 2017. “Transmission. CREST Security Review”, 3. Accessed January 30. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/news/csr-issue-3-transmission/.
   Google Scholar
• CREST. 2018a. “Overview.” Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. Accessed 29 June 2018. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/about/.
   Google Scholar
• CREST. 2018b. “Resources.” Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. Accessed 4 July 2018. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/category/resources/.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. 2017. “Engaging with Policymakers: Some Tips to Help You on Your Journey.” ESRC Blog 17 (March). https://blog.esrc.ac.uk/2017/03/17/engaging-with-policymakers-some-tips-to-help-you-on-your-journey/.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, L. L. 2009. The Study of New Religious Movements and the Process of Radicalization in Terrorist Groups. Defence Research and Development Canada. Ottawa: Centre for Security Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, L. L. 2010. “The Study of New Religious Movements and the Radicalization of Home-Grown Terrorists: Opening a Dialogue.” Terrorism and Political Violence 22 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/09546550903409163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, L. L., and A. Amarasingam. 2017. “Talking to Foreign Fighters: Insights into the Motivations for Hijrah to Syria and Iraq.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 40 (3): 191–210. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2016.1274216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinham, A., and M. Francis. 2015. “Religious Literacy: Contesting an Idea and Practice.” In Religious Literacy in Policy and Practice, edited by A. Dinham and M. Francis, 3–25. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, J. S. 1999. “Bridging the Gap between Scholars of Religion and Law Enforcement Officials.” Nova Religio 3 (1): 8–26. doi:10.1525/nr.1999.3.1.8.
   Google Scholar
• Echt, L. 2016. “What are the Principles of Policy Relevant Research?” Politics and Ideas. Accessed June 30. http://www.politicsandideas.org/?p=3171.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., N. Ali, and M. Armstrong. 2016. “Critical Terrorism Studies: Reflections on Policy-Relevance and Disciplinarity.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/17539153.2016.1151306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, M., and K. Knott. 2015. “‘Return? It Never Left.’ Exploring the ‘Sacred’ as a Resource for Bridging the Gap between the Religious and the Secular.” In Religious Norms in the Public Sphere, edited by M. Francis, C. Kim Knott, H. R. Kutz, and O. Roy, 48–57. Florence, Italy: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, M., and A. V. E. D. Van Twist. 2015. “Religious Literacy in Policy and Practice.” In Religious Literacy, Radicalisation and Extremism, edited by A. Dinham and M. Francis, 113–134. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, M. D. 2016. “Why the ‘Sacred’ Is a Better Resource than ‘Religion’ for Understanding Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 28 (5): 912–927. doi:10.1080/09546553.2014.976625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R. 1997. “On the Distinction between Know-How, Know-What and Know-Why.” In Advances in Strategic Management, edited by A. Huff and J. Walsh, 81–101. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Githens-Mazer, J., and R. Lambert. 2010. “Why Conventional Wisdom on Radicalization Fails: The Persistence of a Failed Discourse.” International Affairs 86 (4): 889–901. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00918.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleave, R. 2013. “Legitimate and Illegitimate Violence in Islamic Thought.” Accessed 9 July 2018. http://www.livitproject.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Gleave, R. 2016. “Islamic Reformulations.” Accessed 9 July 2018. http://www.islamicreformulations.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D. M. 2010. “Security and the Culture Expert: Dilemmas of an Engaged Anthropology.” Political and Legal Anthropology Review 33 (1): 126–142. doi:10.1111/j.1555-2934.2010.01071.x.
   Google Scholar
• Government, U. K. 2011. “Contest: The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Counter-Terrorism”. Accessed https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97995/strategy-contest.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, S. 2016. Sufis, Salafis and Islamists: The Contested Ground of British Islamic Activism. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Divinity School. 2018. “Religious Literacy Project.” Accessed 3 July 2018. https://rlp.hds.harvard.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. C., and L. L. Dawson. 2014. “The Neglected Role of Charismatic Authority in the Study of Terrorist Groups and Radicalization.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 37 (4): 348–368. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2014.879436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, D. 2014. The Al-Qaeda Doctrine: The Framing and Evolution of the Leadership’s Public Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, D. 2017. “What Types of Media Do Terrorists Collect? an Analysis of Religious, Political and Ideological Publications Found in Terrorism Investigations in the UK”. ICCT Research Paper. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. Accessed https://icct.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ICCT-Holbrook-What-Types-of-Media-Do-Terrorists-Collect-Sept-2017-2.pdf. doi:10.19165/2017.1.011
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. 2015. “What Is Policy Relevance?” War on the Rocks. Accessed June 17. https://warontherocks.com/2015/06/what-is-policy-relevance/.
   Google Scholar
• INFORM. 2018. “About.” Accessed 1 July 2018. http://www.inform.ac/about-inform/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2016. “To Be or Not to Be Policy Relevant? Power, Emancipation and Resistance in CTS Research.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (1): 120–125. doi:10.1080/17539153.2016.1147771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. 2002a. “Introduction.” In Millennial Violence: Past, Present and Future, edited by J. Kaplan, 1–24. London and Portland OR: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J., ed. 2002b. Millennial Violence: Past, Present and Future. London and Portland OR: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, K. 2018. “Muslims and Islam in the UK: A Research Synthesis”. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. Accessed https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/british-muslims-full-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, K., and M. D. Francis. Forthcoming. “How Do Religious and Other Ideological Minorities Respond to Uncertainties?.” In Minority Religions and Uncertainty, edited by M. D. Francis and K. Knott. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, K., E. Poole, and T. Taira. 2013. Media Portrayals of Religion and the Secular Sacred: Representation and Change. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, K., and D. Randolph-Horn. 2005. Religious Literacy: A Practical Guide to the Region’s Faith Communities. 4th ed. Wakefield: Yorkshire and Humber Assembly. http://arts.leeds.ac.uk/crp/files/2013/05/Knott_Horn-2005-Religious-literacy-4th-ed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kundnani, A. 2014. The Muslims are Coming: Islamophobia, Extremism, and the War on Terror. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leader Maynard, J. 2014. “Rethinking the Role of Ideology in Mass Atrocities.” Terrorism and Political Violence 26 (5): 821–841. doi:10.1080/09546553.2013.796934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., and K. Knott. 2016. “Ideological Transmission I: The Family”. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. Accessed https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/family-ideological-transmission/.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., and K. Knott. 2017. “Ideological Transmission II: Peers, Education and Prisons”. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. Accessed https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/peers-education-prisons/.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., and K. Knott. 2018. Ideological Transmission III: Political and Religious Organisations. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. Accessed https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/political-religious-organisations/.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, P. 2018. “Muslims, Trust and Cultural Dialogue.” Accessed 8 July 2018. http://www.muslimstrustdialogue.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, P., and T. Riley-Smith. 2016. Trust and the Prevent Duty. PaCCS Policy Briefing. Partnership for Conflict, Crime and Security Research. Accessed http://www.paccsresearch.org.uk/policy-briefings/trust-and-the-prevent-duty/files/assets/basic-html/page-1.html.
   Google Scholar
• NCA. 2007. “The Network of Concerned Anthropologists Pledges to Boycott Counterinsurgency.” Anthropology News. Accessed December 24. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/an.2007.48.9.4.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, P. 2013. “The Trouble with Radicalization.” International Affairs 89 (4): 873–893. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Safety Canada. 2015. “Kanishka Project First Round.” Accessed 4 July 2018. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/r-nd-flght-182/knshk/frst-rnd-sccssfl-prjcts-en.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, I. 1996. A Poisonous Cocktail? Aum Shinrikyo’s Path to Violence. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, I. 2002. “Spectres and Shadows: Aum Shinrikyo and the Road to Megiddo.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14 (1): 147–186. doi:10.1080/714005600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader, I. 2012. “Globally Aum: The Aum Affair, Counterterrorism, and Religion.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 39 (1): 179–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. 2015. “From Terrorism to ‘Radicalisation’ to Extremism: Counter-Terrorism Imperative or Loss of Focus?” International Affairs 91 (2): 371–380. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley-Smith, T. 2015. “Religion and Contemporary Security Challenges”. PaCCS Briefing. Accessed http://www.paccsresearch.org.uk/blog/paccs-policy-briefing-religion-contemporary-security-challenges/.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. 2017. The Idea, Context, Framing and Realities of ‘Sikh Radicalisation’ in Britain. CREST Report. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/sikh-radicalisation-full-report/. doi:10.2174/156802661709170213214101
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and S. Byrd. 2007. “Ideology, Framing Processes, and Islamic Terrorist Movements.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 12 (2): 119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toros, H. 2016. “Dialogue, Praxis and the State: A Response to Richard Jackson.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (1): 126–130. doi:10.1080/17539153.2016.1147775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSAS. 2018. “About.” Canadian Research Network for Terrorism, Security and Society. Accessed 8 July 2018. https://www.tsas.ca/about/.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2015. “Counter-Extremism Strategy”. Accessed October 19. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counter-extremism-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, G., and M. Hoelzl, edited by. 2008. The New Visibility of Religion. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Wessinger, C. 1999. “Religious Studies Scholars, FBI Agents, and the Montana Freemen Standoff.” Nova Religio 3 (1): 36–44. doi:10.1525/nr.1999.3.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffe, J. 2017a. “Solving Religious Illiteracy Key to Security Challenge.” ESRC Shaping Society, Accessed August 9. https://esrc.ukri.org/news-events-and-publications/news/news-items/solving-religious-illiteracy-key-to-security-challenge/.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffe, J. 2017b. “Religion, Martyrdom and Global Uncertainties.” Impact 9: 73–75. doi:10.21820/23987073.2017.9.73.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffe, J., and G. Moorhead. 2014. Religion, Security and Global Uncertainties. PaCCS/The Open University. Accesed http://www.paccsresearch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Religion-Security-Global-Uncertainties.pdf.
   Google Scholar