La base común en grupos de discusión clínica: Resonancia intersubjetiva y teorías implícitas

Referencias

• Altmann de Litvan, M. (Ed.). (2014). Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis -The Three-Level Model. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., Baranger, W., & Mom, J. M. (1983). Process and non-process in analytic work. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 1-15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. Int.J.Psychoanal., 70 ( Pt 2), 341-357.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2001). La necesidad de controversias en Psicoanálisis. Los debates sobre M. Klein y J. Lacan en el Río de la Plata. En Psicoanálisis. Focos y aperturas. (pp. 44-73). Montevideo: Psicolibros.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2002). The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis: the debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata. Int J Psychoanal, 83, 851-73. doi: 10.1516/P2WF-57VJ-25MY-3RM4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2014a). The assessment of changes: diagnostic aspects. En Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis -The Three-Level Model. (pp. 263-278). London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2014b). The three-level model (3-LM) for observing patient transformations. En M. Altmann (Ed.), Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis - The Three-Level Model (pp. 3-34). London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2015). What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis? Int. J. Psychoanal., 96, 731-754. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., & de León de Bernardi, B. (2012). The Concepts of Vínculo and Dialectical Spiral: A Bridge between Intra- and Intersubjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 81, 531-564. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2012.tb00507.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and Interpretation. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. (1969). Teoría y práctica en psicoanálisis. La praxis psicoanalítica. , XI, 287-303. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, XI, 287-303.
   Google Scholar
• Bohleber, W., Jiménez, J. P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S., & Zysman, S. (2015). Unconscious Phantasy and its Conceptualizations: An Attempt at Conceptual Integration. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 96, 705-730. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohleber, W., Fonagy, P., Jiménez, J.P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S., & Zysman, S., F., P. (2013). Towards a Better Use of Psychoanalytic Concepts: A Model Illustrated Using the Concept of Enactment. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 94, 501-530. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canestri, J. (Ed.). (2006). Psychoanalysis. From Practice to Theory. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri, J. (Ed.). (2012). Putting Theory to Work. How are Theories Actually Used in Practice? London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. En L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. M. (2008). American Psychoanalysis Today: A Plurality of Orthodoxies. J. Am. Acad. Psychoanal. Dyn. Psychiatr., 36, 235-253. doi: 10.1521/jaap.2008.36.2.235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper, S. H. (2015). Clinical Theory at the Border(s): Emerging and Unintended Crossings in the Development of Clinical Theory, 96, 273-292.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, F. (2013). The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, M. (1988). Psychoanalysis. A Theory in Crisis. Chicago, Illinois: Univ. Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. (1996). Listening to Listening. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 77, 667-677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. (2009). Transformations in Dreaming and Characters in the Psychoanalytic Field. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 90, 209-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00131.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism. En Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time (Vol. III, pp. 28-97). Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1912). Consejos al médico sobre el tratamiento psicoanalítico. En The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XII, pp. 107-119). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1918a). De la Historia de una Neurosis Infantil. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1918b). From the History of an Infantile Neurosis. En The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XVII).
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. O., & Ogden, T. H. (2009). On becoming a psychoanalyst. Int. J. Psychoanal., 90, 311-327. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00130.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, M. M. (Ed.). (1971). The Wolf-Man by the Wolf-Man. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2005). The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 627-632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, S. (2015). Leticia: el nacimiento de las interrogaciones sobre sí misma. En Tiempo de Cambio. Indagando las transformaciones en psicoanálisis: el modelo de los tres niveles (pp. 35-50). Londres: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to «scientific legitimacy»: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57, 1043-1069. doi: 10.1177/0003065109343925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P., & Steiner, R. (Eds.). (1991). The Freud-Klein Controversies 1941-1945 (Vol. 11). London ; New York: Tavistock-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1932/1964). El psicoanálisis de niños. Buenos Aires: Hormé.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. (1990). Demystifying Underdetermination. En Scientific Theories (C. Wade Savage, Vol. 14, pp. 267-297). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Recuperado a partir de http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~bwrobert/teaching/einstein/pdf/Laudan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leclaire, S. (1958). A propósito del episodio psicótico de "El Hombre de los Lobos. Psychanalyse, 4, 108-135.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, M., Bernardi, R., Altmann, M., Bouza, G., Cárdenas, M., & de León, B. (1985). Investigando la experiencia analítica: una propuesta. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 83, 117-135.
   Google Scholar
• OPD Task Force (Ed.). (2008). Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis OPD-2. Manual of Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pichon-Rivière, E. (1998). El Proceso Grupal. Del Psicoanálisis a la Psicología Social. Buenos Aires: Nueva visión.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reik, T. (1968). Theodor Reik Speaks of his Psychoanalytic Technique. Amer. Imago, 25, 16-20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int.J.Psychoanal., 64, 35-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, K. (2013). Underdetermination of Scientific Theory. En The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Recuperado a partir de http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/scientific-underdetermination/
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: University Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2001). Return to Reason. London: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D. (2006). The search to define and describe how psychoanalysts work: preliminary report on the project of the EPF Working Party on Comparative Clinical Methods. En Psychoanalysis. From Practice to Theory (pp. 167-200). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D., Basile, R., Birksted-Breen, D., Böhm, T., Denis, P., Ferro, A., … Schubert, J. (2008). Psychoanalysis Comparable and Incomparable : The Evolution of a Method to Describe and Compare Psychoanalytic Approaches. East Sussex ; New York: Routledge. Recuperado a partir de http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0723/2007029653.html
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? Int.J.Psychoanal., 69, 5-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1990). Psychoanalysis: The Common Ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 3-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (2005). Dialogue or illusion? How do we go from here? Response to André Green. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 633-638. doi: 10.1516/VJHB-7R8A-162R-B5WN
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widlöcher, D. (2008). Les psychanalystes savent-ils débattre? Paris: Odile-Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R. (2014). Discussion of S. Cooper’s paper, ‘Clinical theory at the border(s): Considering and mergent type of theory in a post-pluralistic psychoanalysis’. Int J Psychoanal Open.
   Google Scholar