Fomentar el valor educativo de la evaluación al candidato

Referencias

• Brodbeck H (2008). Anxiety in psychoanalytic training from the candidate’s point-of-view. Psychoanal Inq 28:329–43. doi: 10.1080/07351690801962331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechler S (2008). Shaming psychoanalytic candidates. Psychoanal Inq 28:361–72. doi: 10.1080/07351690801962430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabaniss DL (2008). Becoming a school: Developing learning objectives for psychoanalytic education. Psychoanal Inq 28:262–77. doi: 10.1080/07351690801960814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabaniss DL, Aizaga KH, O’Neil MK, Spiwack A, Van Schaik JV (2005). The multi-center assessment project (MAP): The development of a collaborative multi-center educational consortium. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 57:191–5. doi: 10.1177/00030651090570011004
   Google Scholar
• Cabaniss DL, Glick RA, Roose SP (2001). Data from the dyad: The Columbia supervision study. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 49:235–67. doi: 10.1177/00030651010490010501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabaniss DL, Schein JW, Rosen P, Roose SP (2003). Candidate progression in analytic institutes: A multi-center study. Int J Psychoanal 84:77–94. doi: 10.1516/8TCV-7XW7-AYFR-R5T9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Columbia Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research (2013). A guide to progression. Unpublished. http://psychoanalysis.columbia.edu/inside-center/candidates/progression-criteria
   Google Scholar
• Driver C (2008). Assessment in supervision: an analytic perspective. Brit J Psychother 24:328–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0118.2008.00089.x
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich L, Kulish N, Fitzpatrick-Hanly MA, Robinson M, Rothstein A (in press). Supervisory countertransference and impingements in evaluating readiness for graduation: Always present, routinely under-recognized. Int J Psychoanal.
   Google Scholar
• Frijling-Schreuder EC, Isaac-Edersheim E, Van der Leeuw PJ (1981). The supervisor’s evaluation of the candidate. Int J Psychoanal 8:393–400.
   Google Scholar
• Gediman HK (2001). The supervisory process: Triadic system and beyond. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 49:733–7. doi: 10.1177/00030651010490030801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze E (2015). What do we learn in psychoanalytic training? Int J Psychoanal 96:755–71. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelstam K (2011). The interactive category schema of candidate competence: An Australian experience. Int J Psychoanal 92:1289–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00437.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs D (2001). Narcissism, erotism, and envy in the supervisory relationship. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 49(3):813–30. doi: 10.1177/00030651010490031001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe L (2000). Supervision as an intersubjective process: Hearing from candidates and supervisors. Report on panel, American Psychoanalytic Association December 21, 1996. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 48:561–70. doi: 10.1177/00030651000480021001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe L (2001). Countertransference, supervised analysis, and psychoanalytic training requirements. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 49:831–53. doi: 10.1177/00030651010490031101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junkers G, Tuckett D, Zachrisson A (2008). To be or not to be a psychoanalyst – How do we know a candidate is ready to qualify? Difficulties and controversies in evaluating psychoanalytic competence. Psychoanal Inq 28:288–308. doi: 10.1080/07351690801960871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg O (1996). Thirty methods to destroy the creativity of psychoanalytic candidates. Int J Psychoanal 77:1031–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg O (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. Int J Psychoanal 81:97–120. doi: 10.1516/0020757001599555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg O (2008). Discussion. Psychoanal Inq 28:387–94. doi: 10.1080/07351690801962521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power A (2013). Supervision of supervision: How many mirrors do we need? Brit J Psychother 29:389–404. doi: 10.1111/bjp.12038
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger HJ (1995). Supervision for fun and profit: Or how to tell if the fun is profitable. Psychoanal Inq 15:190–210. doi: 10.1080/07351699509534028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolnikoff AZ (1997). The supervisorial situation: intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing transference and countertransference themes. Psychoanal Inq 17:90–107. doi: 10.1080/07351699709534111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimmel B (1995). Resistance to awareness of the supervisor’s transferences with special reference to the parallel process. Int J Psychoanal 76:609–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szecsody I (2008). Does anything go in psychoanalytic supervision? Psychoanal Inq 28:373–86. doi: 10.1080/07351690801962455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2005). Does anything go? Towards a framework for the more transparent assessment. Int J Psychoanal 86:31–49. doi: 10.1516/R2U5-XJ37-7DFJ-DD18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener J (2007). Evaluating progress in training: Character or competence? J Analytic Psych 52:171–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2007.00651.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar