Brain Data in Context: Are New Rights the Way to Mental and Brain Privacy?

REFERENCES

• Ariely, D., and G. S. Berns. 2010. Neuromarketing: The hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (4):284–92. doi:10.1038/nrn2795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., and H. Nissenbaum. 2009. On notice: The trouble with notice and consent. In Proceedings of the Engaging Data Forum: The First International Forum on the Application and Management of Personal Electronic Information, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Birnhack, M. D. 2012. A quest for a theory of privacy: Context and control. Jurimetrics 51 (4):447–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bockbrader, M. A., G. Francisco, R. Lee, J. Olson, R. Solinsky, and M. L. Boninger. 2018. Brain computer interfaces in rehabilitation medicine. Physical Medicine &Rehabilitation 10 (9S2):S233–S243. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.028.
   Google Scholar
• Boire, R. G. 2001. On cognitive liberty. Journal of Cognitive Liberties 2:7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, J.-C. 2013. My mind is mine!? Cognitive liberty as a legal concept. In Cognitive Enhancement, ed. H. Franke, vol. 1, 233–264. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, J. C. 2022. Novel neurorights: From nonsense to substance. Neuroethics 15 (1):7. doi:10.1007/s12152-022-09481-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carraro, V. 2019. Promoting compliance with human rights: The performance of the United Nations’ universal periodic review and treaty bodies. International Studies Quarterly 63 (4):1079–93. doi:10.1093/isq/sqz078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., and D. Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58 (1):7–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, M. L., and J. Illes. 2007. Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology—the ethical terrain. Nature Biotechnology 25 (4):393–7. doi:10.1038/nbt0407-393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, P. 2017. Human rights: Effectiveness of international and regional mechanisms. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. 22; Accessed 10 Mar. 2023. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.214.
   Google Scholar
• Farahany, N. A. 2012a. Incriminating thoughts. Stanford Law Review 64:351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J. 2005. Neuroethics: The practical and the philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):34–40. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahany, N. A. 2012b. Searching Secrets. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., and P. R. Wolpe. 2004. Monitoring and manipulating brain function: New neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. The Hastings Center Report 34 (3):35–45. doi:10.2307/3528418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fins, J. J. 2022. The unintended consequences of Chile’s neurorights constitutional reform: Moving beyond negative rights to capabilities. Neuroethics 15(3): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s12152-022-09504-z
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato, V. C. R., J. De Moura, E. Giraldi, and J. Henrique Caldeira De Oliveira. 2014. A review of studies on neuromarketing: Practical results, techniques, contributions and limitations. Journal of Management Research 6 (2):201. doi:10.5296/jmr.v6i2.5446.
   Google Scholar
• Garden, H., and D. Winickoff. 2018. Issues in neurotechnology governance. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/11. Vol. 2018/11. doi:10.1787/c3256cc6-en.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, S., E. Klein, L. S. Sullivan, A. Wexler, B. Agüera y Arcas, G. Bi, J. M. Carmena, J. J. Fins, P. Friesen, J. Gallant, et al. 2021. Recommendations for responsible development and application of neurotechnologies. Neuroethics 14 (3):365–86. doi:10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, S., and R. Yuste. 2016. On the necessity of ethical guidelines for novel neurotechnologies. Cell 167 (4):882–5. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greely, H. T., C. Grady, K. M. Ramos, W. Chiong, J. Eberwine, N. A. Farahany, L. S. M. Johnson, B. T. Hyman, S. E. Hyman, K. S. Rommelfanger, et al. 2018. Neuroethics guiding principles for the NIH BRAIN initiative. The Journal of Neuroscience 38 (50):10586–8. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2077-18.2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, U. C. 2013. Informed consent in clinical research: Revisiting few concepts and areas. Perspectives in Clinical Research 4 (1):26–32. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.106373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallinan, D., P. Schütz, M. Friedewald, and P. D. Hert. 2013. Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated? Surveillance & Society 12 (1):55–72. doi:10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, B. 2009. It’s all in your head: Neurotechnological lie detection and the fourth and fifth amendments. Developments in Mental Health Law 28 (1):25.
   Google Scholar
• Ienca, M. 2021b. On neurorights. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15:701258. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.701258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca, M., and R. Andorno. 2017. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):5. doi:10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca, M., J. J. Fins, R. J. Jox, F. Jotterand, S. Voeneky, R. Andorno, T. Ball, C. Castelluccia, R. Chavarriaga, H. Chneiweiss, et al. 2022. Towards a governance framework for brain data. Neuroethics 15 (2):1–14. doi:10.1007/s12152-022-09498-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca, M., P. Haselager, and E. J. Emanuel. 2018. Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 36 (9):805–10. doi:10.1038/nbt.4240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca, M. 2021a. Common human rights challenges raised by different applications of neurotechnologies in the biomedical field. Report commissioned by the Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/report-final-en/1680a429f3.
   Google Scholar
• Jarosiewicz, B., and M. Morrell. 2021. The RNS system: Brain-responsive neurostimulation for the treatment of epilepsy. Expert Review of Medical Devices 18 (2):129–38. doi:10.1080/17434440.2019.1683445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, H. 1998. How is international human rights law enforced? Indiana Law Journal 74 (3):1397–417. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2279&context=ilj.
   Google Scholar
• Ligthart, S., T. Douglas, C. Bublitz, T. Kooijmans, and G. Meynen. 2021. Forensic brain-reading and mental privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and challenges. Neuroethics 14 (2):191–203. doi:10.1007/s12152-020-09438-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, W. M. 2018. Demystifying neuromarketing. Journal of Business Research 91:205–20. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, K. 2017. Brain privacy, intimacy, and authenticity: Why a complete lack of the former might undermine neither of the latter! Res Publica 23 (2):227–44. doi:10.1007/s11158-016-9344-z.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M.-C., and A. S. Widge. 2017. Closed-loop neuromodulation systems: Next-generation treatments for psychiatric illness. International Review of Psychiatry 29 (2):191–204. doi:10.1080/09540261.2017.1282438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, R. G., F. Ungureanu, and C. Cimpanu. 2019. Brain-computer interface: Challenges and research perspectives. In 2019 22nd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS), 387–394. Bucharest, Romania: IEEE. doi:10.1109/CSCS.2019.00071.
   Google Scholar
• Meegan, D. V. 2008. Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: Scientific, ethical, and legal issues. The American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):9–20. doi:10.1080/15265160701842007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, S. 2021. Here’s how police can get your data—even if you aren’t suspected of a crime. Vox, July 31, 2021. https://www.vox.com/recode/22565926/police-law-enforcement-data-warrant.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E. R., J. Illes, and P. B. Reiner. 2008. Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7 (4–5):293–302. doi:10.1002/cb.252.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. 2010. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford, California: Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Penenberg, A. 2011. NeuroFocus uses neuromarketing to hack your brain. Fast Company, August 8, 2011. https://www.fastcompany.com/1769238/neurofocus-uses-neuromarketing-hack-your-brain
   Google Scholar
• Powles, J., and H. Hodson. 2017. Google deepmind and healthcare in an age of algorithms. Health and Technology 7 (4):351–67. doi:10.1007/s12553-017-0179-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, S., K. McGillivray, S. Akintoye, T. Fothergill, C. Bublitz, and B. Stahl. 2020. Is the European data protection regulation sufficient to deal with emerging data concerns relating to neurotechnology? Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7 (1):lsaa051. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiner, P. B. 2011. The rise of neuroessentialism. In The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, eds. J. Illes and B. J. Sahakian. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roelfsema, P. R., D. Denys, and P. C. Klink. 2018. Mind reading and writing: The future of neurotechnology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22 (7):598–610. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millennium. Neuron (1)35:21–3. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00763-88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryberg, J. 2017. Neuroethics and brain privacy: Setting the stage. Res Publica 23 (2):153–8. doi:10.1007/s11158-016-9340-3.
   Google Scholar
• Schönau, A., I. Dasgupta, T. Brown, E. Versalovic, E. Klein, and S. Goering. 2021. Mapping the dimensions of agency. AJOB Neuroscience 12 (2–3):172–86. doi:10.1080/21507740.2021.1896599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sententia, W. 2004. Neuroethical considerations: Cognitive liberty and converging technologies for improving human cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1013:221–8. doi:10.1196/annals.1305.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, J. J., D. J. Krusienski, and J. R. Wolpaw. 2012. Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 87 (3):268–79. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solove, D. J. 2013. Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review 126:1880–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, S. J., W. Sinnott-Armstrong, and S. A. Huettel. 2017. Neuromarketing: Ethical implications of its use and potential misuse. Journal of Business Ethics 144 (4):799–811. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susser, D. 2016. Information privacy and social self-authorship. In Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (3):216–39. doi:10.5840/techne201671548.
   Google Scholar
• Susser, D., B. Roessler, and H. Nissenbaum. 2019. Online manipulation: Hidden influences in a digital world. Georgetown Law Technology Review 4:1–45.
   Google Scholar
• The Editorial Board. 2019. Total surveillance is not what America signed up for. The New York Times, December 22, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/21/opinion/location-data-privacy-rights.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tovino, S. A. 2007. Functional neuroimaging information: A case for neuro exceptionalism? Scholarly Works. 76. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/76
   Google Scholar
• Westin, A. F. 1968. Privacy and freedom. Washington and Lee Law Review 25 (1):166–70. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol25/iss1/20.
   Google Scholar
• Wetsman, N. 2021. Hospitals are selling treasure troves of medical data—what could go wrong? The Verge. June 23, 2021. https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/23/22547397/medical-records-health-data-hospitals-research.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. W., J. A. Richey, D. Gracanin, M. A. Bell, S. LaConte, M. Coffman, A. Trubanova, and I. Kim. 2015. The promise of neurotechnology in clinical translational science. Clinical Psychological Science 3 (5):797–815. doi:10.1177/2167702614549801.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuste, R., S. Goering, B. Agüera y Arcas, G. Bi, J. M. Carmena, A. Carter, J. J. Fins, P. Friesen, J. Gallant, J. E. Huggins, et al. 2017. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature 551 (7679):159–63. doi:10.1038/551159a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. First edition. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar