REFERENCES
- Birks, D. 2024. Chemical restraints and the basic liberties. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):22–4. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292498.
- Crutchfield, P., and M. Redinger. 2024. The conditions for ethical chemical restraints. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):3–16. doi:10.1080/21507740.2022.2126539.
- De Marco, G., T. Douglas, L. Forsberg, and J. Savulescu. 2024. On the relative intrusiveness of physical and chemical restraints. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):26–8. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292499.
- Dougherty, R., J. Smolenski, and J. N. Smith. 2024. The lived realities of chemical restraint: prioritizing patient experience. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):29–31. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292506.
- Hempeler, C., E. Braun, M. Faissner, J. Gather, and M. Scholten. 2024. Preferences of individual mental health service users are essential in determining the least restrictive type of restraint. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):19–22. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292502.
- Tsu, P. S.-H., and S. Sugimoto. 2024. On being conscious as a basic liberty. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):24–6. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292489.