39
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correspondence

Basic Liberties, Consent, and Chemical Restraints

& ORCID Icon

REFERENCES

  • Birks, D. 2024. Chemical restraints and the basic liberties. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):22–4. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292498.
  • Crutchfield, P., and M. Redinger. 2024. The conditions for ethical chemical restraints. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):3–16. doi:10.1080/21507740.2022.2126539.
  • De Marco, G., T. Douglas, L. Forsberg, and J. Savulescu. 2024. On the relative intrusiveness of physical and chemical restraints. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):26–8. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292499.
  • Dougherty, R., J. Smolenski, and J. N. Smith. 2024. The lived realities of chemical restraint: prioritizing patient experience. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):29–31. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292506.
  • Hempeler, C., E. Braun, M. Faissner, J. Gather, and M. Scholten. 2024. Preferences of individual mental health service users are essential in determining the least restrictive type of restraint. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):19–22. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292502.
  • Tsu, P. S.-H., and S. Sugimoto. 2024. On being conscious as a basic liberty. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (1):24–6. doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2292489.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.