REFERENCES
- Baselga-Garriga, C., P. Rodriguez, and R. Yuste. 2022. Neuro rights: A human rights solution to ethical issues of neurotechnologies. In: Protecting the mind. Ethics of science and technology assessment, eds. P. López-Silva and L. Valera, 49. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94032-4_13.
- Bublitz, C. 2022. Novel neurorights: From nonsense to substance. Neuroethics 15 (1):7. doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09481-3.
- Bublitz, J. C. 2024. What an International declaration on neurotechnologies and human rights could look like: Ideas, suggestions, desiderata. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (2):96–112. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2270512.
- Gilbert, F., C. Pham, J. Viaña, and W. Gillam. 2019. Increasing brain-computer interfaces media depictions: pressing ethical concerns. Brain-Computer Interfaces 6 (3):49–70. doi: 10.1080/2326263X.2019.1655837.
- Gilbert, F., L. Burns, and T. Krahn. 2011. The Inheritance, power and predicaments of the “brain-reading” metaphor. Medicine Studies 2 (4):229–44. doi: 10.1007/s12376-010-0054-0.
- Gilbert, F., and E. Goddard. 2014. Thinking ahead too much: Speculative ethics and implantable brain devices. AJOB Neuroscience 5 (1):49–51. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2013.863252.
- Gilbert, F., M. Ienca, and M. Cook. 2023. How I became myself after merging with a computer: Does human-machine symbiosis raise human rights issues? Brain Stimulation 16 (3):783–9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.016.
- Gilbert, F., and I. Russo. 2023. Making the cut: What could be evidence for a ‘minimal definition of neurorights’? AJOB Neuroscience 14 (4):382–4. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2257200.
- Gilbert, F., and I. Russo. Under review. Mind-reading in AI and neurotechnology: Evaluating claims, hype, and ethical implications for neurorights. AI and Ethics.
- Pham, C., and F. Gilbert. 2019. Unbacked futures: Ethical issues raised by news media futuristic depiction of brain-computer interfaces. Bioethica Forum 12 (1/2):15–28. doi: 10.24894/BF.2019.12007.
- Lippert-Rasmussen, K. 2017. Brain privacy, intimacy, and authenticity: Why a complete lack of the former might undermine neither of the latter! Res Publica 23 (2):227–44. doi: 10.1007/s11158-016-9344-z.
- López-Silva, P. 2022. The concept of mind in the neuroprotection debate. In Protecting the mind. Ethics of science and technology assessment, eds. P. López-Silva and L. Valera, vol. 49. Amsterdam: Springer.
- Nordmann, A. 2007. If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. Nanoethics 1 (1):31–46. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6.
- Yuste, R., J. Genser, and S. Herrmann. 2021. It’s time for neuro-rights. Horizon 18:154–64.