Tree canopy area-dependent changes in soil properties: a comparative study in the southern limit of boreal forest distribution

References

• Akbulut A. 2014. Environmental degradation as a security threat: the challenge for developing countries. IJHS. 11(1):1227–1237. doi: 10.14687/ijhs.v11i1.2894.
   Google Scholar
• Alamgir M, Marschner P. 2013. Changes in phosphorus pools in three soils upon addition of legume residues differing in carbon/phosphorus ratio. Soil Res. 51(6):484–493. doi: 10.1071/SR12378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg E, et al. 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol Manage. 259(4):660–684. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altrell D. 2019. Multipurpose National Forest Inventory in Mongolia, 2014-2017: a tool to support sustainable forest management. GES. 12(3):167–183. doi: 10.24057/2071-9388-2019-36.
   Google Scholar
• Ares A, Terry T, Miller R, Anderson H, Flaming B. 2005. Ground-based forest harvesting effects on soil physical properties and Douglas-fir growth. Soil Science Soc of Amer J. 69(6):1822–1832. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behjou F, Mollabashi O. 2016. Impact of logging intensity on stem density, basal area and biodiversity indices five years after logging in a Caspian hardwood forest. J Forest Sci. 63:167–172. doi: 10.17221/103/2016-JFS.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett B, Barton G. 2018. The enduring link between forest cover and rainfall: a historical perspective on science and policy discussions. For Ecosyst. 5(1-9). doi: 10.1186/s40663-017-0124-9.
   Google Scholar
• Brockerhoff EG, Barbaro L, Castagneyrol B, Forrester DI, Gardiner B, González-Olabarria JR, Lyver PO, Meurisse N, Oxbrough A, Taki H, et al. 2017. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv. 26(13):3005–3035. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bünemann EK, Condron LM. 2007. Phosphorus and sulphur cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. In Petra Marschner and Zdenko Rengel, editors. Nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Soil Biology, vol. 10. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p. 65–92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68027-7_3.
   Google Scholar
• Dinca L, Badea O, Guiman G, Braga C, Crisan V, Greavu V, Murariu G, Georgescu L. 2018. Monitoring of soil moisture in long-term ecological research (LTER) sites of Romanian Carpathians. Ann Res. 61(2):171–188. doi: 10.15287/afr.2018.1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehbrecht M, Seidel D, Annighöfer P, Kreft H, Köhler M, Zemp DC, Puettmann K, Nilus R, Babweteera F, Willim K, et al. 2021. Global patterns and climatic controls of forest structural complexity. Nat Commun. 12(1):519. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20767-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exbrayat J-F, Liu Y, Williams M. 2017. Impact of deforestation and climate on the Amazon basin’s above-ground biomass during 1993–2012. Sci Rep. 7(1):15615. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15788-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FAO. 2018. The State of the World’s Forests 2018: forest Pathways to Sustainable Development. The State of the World’s Forests (SOFO) 2018. Rome, Italy: FAO. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9535EN/.
   Google Scholar
• Fierer N. 2017. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 15(10):579–590. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gichuho C, Njoroge S, Wambui W. 2013. Land cover change and deforestation in Gazetted Maji Mazuri Forest, Kenya. Int J Sci Res (IJSR). 2(April):563–566.
   Google Scholar
• Gradel A, Sukhbaatar G, Karthe D, Kang H. 2019. Forest management In Mongolia – a review of challenges and lessons learned with special reference to degradation and deforestation. GES. 12(3):133–166. doi: 10.24057/2071-9388-2019-102.
   Google Scholar
• Hajabbasi M, Jalalian A, Karimzadeh H. 1997. Deforestation effects on soil physical and chemical properties, Lordegan, Iran. Plant Soil. 190(2):301–308. doi: 10.1023/A:1004243702208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson K, Laclau J-P, Saint-André L, Mareschal L, van der Heijden G, Nys C, Nicolas M, Ranger J, Legout A. 2020. Chemical fertility of forest ecosystems. Part 1: common soil chemical analyses were poor predictors of stand productivity across a wide range of acidic forest soils. Forest Ecol Manag. 461(April):117843. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117843.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto S, Suzuki M. 2004. The impact of forest clear-cutting on soil temperature: a comparison between before and after cutting, and between clear-cut and control sites. J Forest Res. 9(2):125–132. doi: 10.1007/s10310-003-0063-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Hou E, Veen G, Ellwood F, Dijkstra P, Sui X, Zhang S, Wen D, Chu C. 2019. Soil microbial biomass increases along elevational gradients in the tropics and subtropics but not elsewhere. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 29(2):345–354. doi: 10.1111/geb.13017.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogsteen MJJ, Lantinga EA, Bakker EJ, Groot JCJ, Tittonell PA. 2015. Estimating soil organic carbon through loss on ignition: effects of ignition conditions and structural water loss. Eur J Soil Sci. 66(2):320–328. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini S, Akbarimehr M, Emadian SF, Agh A. 2015. Considering the soil compaction status on logging areas in a Hyrcanian forest. J for Sci. 61(5):210–215. doi: 10.17221/48/2014-JFS.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov L, Kogut B, Semenov V, Turina I, Waksman N. 2017. Development of theory on humus and soil organic matter: from Turin and Waksman to Present Days. Byull Pochvennogo Inst Im. V.V. Dokuch. 90(Dec):3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jang W, Page-Dumroese D, Keyes C. 2016. Long-term soil changes from forest harvesting and residue management in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 80(3):727–741. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2015.11.0413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Deng Z, Zhang Z, Chen S, Huang J, Ding X. 2023. Relative importance of soil properties and functional diversity to the spatial pattern of the forest soil nitrogen. Ecol Indicat. 146(Feb):109806. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109806.
   Google Scholar
• Kim C, Koo K, Byun J, Jeong J. 2005. Post-fire effects on soil properties in red pine (Pinus densiflora) stands. Forest Sci Technol. 1(1):1–7. doi: 10.1080/21580103.2005.9656261.
   Google Scholar
• Lavelle P, Spain A. 2007. Soil ecology. Spain: Springer Science & Business Media. 654 p
   Google Scholar
• Liang C, Schimel J, Jastrow J. 2017. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat Microbiol. 2(8):17105. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Song Y, Liu J, Kang X, Yue ZQ. 2023. Extended wet sieving method for determination of complete particle size distribution of general soils. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 5(1-16). doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.006.
   Google Scholar
• Missanjo E, Kamanga-Thole G. 2014. Impact of site disturbances from harvesting and logging on soil physical properties and Pinus Kesiya tree growth. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014(July):323626–323627. doi: 10.1155/2014/323626.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell R, Hester A, Campbell C, Chapman S, Cameron C, Hewison R, Potts J. 2010. Is vegetation composition or soil chemistry the best predictor of the soil microbial community? Plant Soil. 333(1-2):417–430. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0357-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemček-Korenkova L, Urík M. 2012. Soil moisture and its effect on bulk density and porosity of intact aggregates of three mollic soils. Indian J Agri Sci. 82(Feb):172–176.
   Google Scholar
• Oral HV. 2020. Deforestation. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_390-1.
   Google Scholar
• Oyuntsetseg B, Yondonjamts J, Bayanjargal O, Prathumratana L, Watanabe M, Kim K-W. 2019. Geochemical source and dispersion of copper, arsenic, lead, and zinc in the topsoil from the vicinity of Erdenet mining area, Mongolia. GEEA. 19(2):110–120. doi: 10.1144/geochem2018-025.
   Google Scholar
• Rayment GE, Lyons DJ. 2010. Soil chemical methods – Australasia. Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbook Series, Australia: Csiro Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Saarsalmi A, Tamminen P, Kukkola M, Hautajärvi R. 2010. Whole-tree harvesting at clear-felling: impact on soil chemistry, needle nutrient concentrations and growth of scots pine. Scand J Forest Res. 25(2):148–156. doi: 10.1080/02827581003667314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefidi K, Ghavidel A, Esmaeilpour M, Mohammadi S. 2020. Effect of soil physical and chemical properties on tree cover diversity and structure in Marivan Qamyshlh Forests. Forest Wood Prod. 73(2):225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhbaatar G, Ganbaatar B, Jamsran T, Purevragchaa B, Nachin B, Gradel A. 2019. Assessment of early survival and growth of planted scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings under extreme continental climate conditions of Northern Mongolia. J For Res. 31(1):13–26. doi: 10.1007/s11676-019-00935-8.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhbaatar G, Kyoung-Woong K, Lobanov A, Ganbaatar B, Purevragchaa B, Batchuluun T. 2021. Deforestation and degradation of forests in the Khustai Mountains of Northern Mongolia. Sibirskij Lesnoj Žurnal. 2:53–63. doi: 10.15372/SJFS20210205.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhbaatar G, Nachin B, Purevragchaa B, Ganbaatar B, Mookhor K, Tseveen B, Gradel A. 2019. Which selective logging intensity is most suitable for the maintenance of soil properties and the promotion of natural regeneration in highly continental scots pine forests?–Results 19 years after harvest operations in Mongolia. Forests 10(2):141. doi: 10.3390/f10020141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhbaatar G, Suran B, Baatarbileg N, Chultem D. 2018. Effects of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantations on plant diversity in Northern Mongolia. Mong. J. Biol. Sci.16:59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Tan X, Curran M, Chang S, Maynard D. 2009. Early growth responses of Lodgepole pine and Douglas-fir to soil compaction, organic matter removal, and rehabilitation stand types in Southeastern British Columbia. Forest Sci. 55(June):210–220.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui C-C, Chen Z-S, Hsieh C-F. 2004. Relationships between soil properties and slope position in a lowland rain forest of Southern Taiwan. Geoderma. 123(1-2):131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twedt D, Daniel J. 2012. Wildlife forestry, Chapter 10. In C. A. Okia, editor, Global perspectives on sustainable forest management, Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH; pp 161–190. ISBN: 978-953-51-0569-5, http://www.Intechopen.Com/Books/Global-Perspectives-on-Sustainable-Forest-Management/Wildlife-Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Vale Vagner I, Schiavini G, Araújo A, Gusson S, Lopes A, Paula de Oliveira J, Prado Júnior C, Arantes, O, Neto.   2013. Fast changes in seasonal forest communities due to soil moisture increase after damming. Rev Biol Trop. 61(Dec):1901–1917.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venterea R, Lovett G, Groffman P, Schwarz P. 2003. Landscape patterns of net nitrification in a northern hardwood-conifer forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 67(2):527–539. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2003.0527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall D, Nielsen U, Six J. 2015. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature. 528(7580):69–76. doi: 10.1038/nature15744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalamea M, González G, Lodge D. 2016. Physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil under decaying wood in a tropical wet forest in Puerto Rico. Forests. 7(12):168. doi: 10.3390/f7080168.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang L, Su J. 2018. The soil water condition of a typical agroforestry system under the policy of Northwest China. Forests. 9(12):730. doi: 10.3390/f9120730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Zhou Y, Zhou C, Wu Z, Zheng L, Hu X, Chen H, Gan J. 2015. Effects of cutting intensity on soil physical and chemical properties in a mixed natural forest in Southeastern China. Forests. 6(12):4495–4509. doi: 10.3390/f6124383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar