A systematic review to identify system-related elements that can be used to evaluate community-based rehabilitation (CBR) programmes

References

• World Health Organisation, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, International Labour Organisation, and International Disability and Development Consortium. Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. 2010. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44405/5/9789241548052_empower_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Short S, Godwin M, et al. Models for integrating rehabilitation and primary care: a scoping study. Arch Phys Med Rehabilit. 2009;90:1523–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambone AM, Suarez SC. What can we learn from developing countries. Rural Special Educ Q. 2010;29:29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Grandisson M, Hebert M, Thibeault R. A systematic review on how to conduct evaluations in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skempes D, Bickenbach J. Developing human rights based indicators to support country monitoring of rehabilitation services and programmes for people with disabilities. BMC Int Health Human Rights. 2015;15:25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusli M, Zweekhorst MBM, Miranda-Galarza B, et al. Dealing with stigma: experiences of persons affected by disabilities and leprosy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:261329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health (Botswana). Botswana national policy on disability. Ministry of Health, editor. Botswana: Ministry of Health Botswana; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organisation and World Bank; 2011. Available from: www.who.int/world_report/2011/accessible_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Confederation of Physical Therapists. Primary health care and community based rehabilitation: implications for physical therapy based on a survey of WCPT’s member organisations and literature review. WCPT Briefing Paper 1, London; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner M. Strengthening district health systems. Bull WHO. 2005;83:403–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atun R. Health systems, systems thinking and innovation. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27:iv4–iv8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. The research base of community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organisation, United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation, World Health Organisation. CBR: a strategy for rehabilitation, equalization of opportunities, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities: joint position paper. Switzerland; 2004. Available from: www.who.int/disabilities/publications/cbr/en/
   Google Scholar
• Grandisson M, Thibeault R, Herbert M, et al. Community-based rehabilitation programme evaluations: lessons learned in the field. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J. 2014;25:55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Wolffers I, Huijsman R. The evidence base for community-based rehabilitation: a literature review. Int J Rehabilit Res. 2005;28:187–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirz S, Thomas M. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. Int J Rehabilit Res. 2002;25:163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Hartley S. A process for the systematic review of community-based rehabilitation evaluation reports: formulating evidence for practice. Int J Rehabilit Res. 2006;29:27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver S, Nixon S. A scoping review of 10 years of published literature on community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1385–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce W, Ballantyne S. Developing CBR through evaluation. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J. 2000;2:69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Chung EYH, Packer TL, Yau M. A framework for evaluating community-based rehabilitation in Chinese communities. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1668–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukersmith S, Hartley S, Kuipers P, et al. Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) monitoring and evaluation methods and tools: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1941–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velema JP, Corneljie H. Reflect before you act: providing structure to the evaluation of rehabilitation programmes. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1252–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans D. Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finfgeld-Connet D. Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qualitat Res. 2014;14:341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2007;62:107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg LR-M. The “core category” of grounded theory: making constant comparisons. Int J Qualitat Stud Health Well-Being. 2006;1:141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly J, Willis K, Small R, et al. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:43–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasnabis C, Motsch HK. The participatory development of international guidelines for CBR. Lepr Rev. 2008;79:17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Everybody’s Business: Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. Available from: www.who.int/healthsystems/strategy/everybodys_business.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pina IL, Cohen PD, Larson DB, et al. A framework for describing health care delivery organisations. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:670–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe M, Magnusson D, Baxter L, et al. Community-based rehabilitation in southern Belize. HPA Resource. 2014;14:25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mijnarends DM, Swaans K, Van Brakel WH, et al. Sustainability criteria for CBR programmes - Two case studies of provincial programmes in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J. 2011;22:3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Raja S, Boyce WF, Ramani S, et al. Success indicators for integrating mental health interventions with community-based rehabilitation programmes. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31:284–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol TI, van Brakel W, Schreurs M. Children with disability in Nepal: new hope through CBR. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J. 2014;25:5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Adeoye A, Seeley J, Hartley S. Developing a tool for evaluating community-based rehabilitation in Uganda. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1110–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer M, LeNavenec C-L. Rehabilitation outcome evaluation after severe brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15:473–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell P, Johannsmeier C. The impact of community based rehabilitation as implemented by community rehabilitation facilitators on people with disabilities, their families and communities within South Africa. Disability and Rehabilitation 2009;31:7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashida M. Community mobilisation in a CBR programme in a rural area of Sri Lanka. Disabil CBR Inclus Devel. 2014;25:43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cornieljie H, Velema JP, Finkenflugel H. Community based rehabilitation programmes: monitoring and evaluation in order to get results. Leprosy Rev. 2008;79:36–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Eliad Y, Kizoni R, et al. Evaluation of long-term community based rehabilitation program for adult stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar