Agreement between a 3D camera system and an inertial measurement unit for assessing the range of motion, head repositioning accuracy and quality of movement during neck and head movements

References

• Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990–2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ. 2020;368:m791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:2006–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenneberg MS, Rood M, de Bie R, et al. To what degree does active cervical range of motion differ between patients with neck pain, patients with whiplash, and those without neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(7):1407–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries J, Ischebeck BK, Voogt LP, et al. Joint position sense error in people with neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2015;20(6):736–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton TR, Leake HB, Chalmers KJ, et al. Evidence of impaired proprioception in chronic, idiopathic neck pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(6):876–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell ER, Hudes K, Vernon H, et al. Relationships between cervical range of motion, self-rated disability and fear of movement beliefs in chronic neck pain patients. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2012;20(1):18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treleaven J, Chen X, Sarig Bahat H. Factors associated with cervical kinematic impairments in patients with neck pain. Man Ther. 2016;22:109–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges PW, Tucker K. Moving differently in pain: a new theory to explain the adaptation to pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S90–S98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjansson E, Treleaven J. Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):364–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Man Ther. 2008;13(1):2–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(7):A1–A83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugailly PM, De Santis R, Tits M, et al. Head repositioning accuracy in patients with neck pain and asymptomatic subjects: concurrent validity, influence of motion speed, motion direction and target distance. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2885–2891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjölander P, Michaelson P, Jaric S, et al. Sensorimotor disturbances in chronic neck pain—range of motion, peak velocity, smoothness of movement, and repositioning acuity. Man Ther. 2008;13(2):122–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inokuchi H, Tojima M, Mano H, et al. Neck range of motion measurements using a new three-dimensional motion analysis system: validity and repeatability. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2807–2815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen SWM, Peolsson A, Agger SM, et al. Head repositioning accuracy is influenced by experimental neck pain in those most accurate but not when adding a cognitive task. Scand J Pain. 2019;20(1):191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grip H, Sundelin G, Gerdle B, et al. Variations in the axis of motion during head repositioning–a comparison of subjects with whiplash-associated disorders or non-specific neck pain and healthy controls. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007;22(8):865–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palsson TS, Christensen SW, Thomsen MH, et al. Assessment of range and quality of neck movement using a smartphone-based application. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;41:64–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailon C, Damas M, Pomares H, et al. SPIRA: an automatic system to support lower limb injury assessment. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. 2019;10(6):2111–2123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michiels S, Hallemans A, Van de Heyning P, et al. Measurement of cervical sensorimotor control: the reliability of a continuous linear movement test. Man Ther. 2014;19(5):399–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juul T, Langberg H, Enoch F, et al. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion–comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):98–104. discussion 105–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoomes-de Graaf M, Thoomes E, Falla D, et al. Does the patient and clinician perception of restricted range of cervical movement agree with the objective quantification of movement in people with neck pain? And do clinicians agree in their interpretation? Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;50:102226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgueta-Cancino E, Rice K, Abichandani D, et al. Measurement properties of smartphone applications for the measurement of neck range of motion: a systematic review and meta analyses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Committee on Health Research Ethics. What to notify? nvk.dk: The National Committee on Health Research Ethics; 2019. [updated 2021 Feb 21; cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: https://en.nvk.dk/how-to-notify/what-to-notify.
   Google Scholar
• Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Park S, Subramaniyam M, Nam Min S, et al. Precision and repeatability analysis of a motion analysis system for traction therapy. IJET. 2018;7(2.8):156.
   Google Scholar
• NDI. Optotrak certus. Ontario: NDI; 2015. p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumder MMG, Kim S, Park SJ, et al. Precision and repeatability analysis of optotrak certus as a tool for gait analysis. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2007;40(16):107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy K, Neil J, Tallon A, et al. Reliability and validity of cervical position measurements in individuals with and without chronic neck pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2015;23(4):188–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan N, Sternad D. Sensitivity of smoothness measures to movement duration, amplitude, and arrests. J Mot Behav. 2009;41(6):529–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitazawa S, Goto T, Urushihara Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation of reaching movements in cats with and without cerebellar lesions using normalized integral of jerk. In: Mano N, Hamada I, DeLong M, editors. Role of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in voluntary movement. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1993. p. 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Yan JH, Hinrichs RN, Payne VG, et al. Normalized jerk: a measure to capture developmental characteristics of young girls’ overarm throwing. J Appl Biomech. 2000;16(2):196–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statist Med. 1998;17(1):101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arifin WN. Sample size calculator Internet 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 1]. Available from: http://wnarifin.github.io
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Vol. 2. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis PD. The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Castro WH, Sautmann A, Schilgen M, et al. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(4):443–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, Smeesters C, Breton AM, et al. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(4):242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisvert-Plante V, Noutsios CD, Perez J, et al. The telemedicine-based pediatric examination of the neck and upper limbs: a narrative review. J Pain Res. 2021;14:3173–3192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Lindstroem R, Carstens NP, et al. Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittmann F, Lambercy O, Gassert R. Magnetometer-based drift correction during rest in IMU arm motion tracking. Sensors. 2019;19(6):1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J. A review of wearable IMU (Inertial-Measurement-Unit)-based pose estimation and drift reduction technologies. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1087:042003.
   Google Scholar