The right ear advantage – a perspective from speech perception in noise test

References

• Iglehart F. Speech perception in classroom acoustics by children with hearing loss and wearing hearing aids. Am J Audiol. 2020;29(1):6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatte M, Lachmann T, Meis M. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise Health. 2010;12(49):270–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondelli MFCG, Dos Santos MdM, José MR. Speech perception in noise in unilateral hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(4):427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannson N, James CJ, Fraysse B, et al. Speech-in-noise perception in unilateral hearing loss: relation to pure-tone thresholds and brainstem plasticity. Neuropsychologia. 2017;102:135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder RM, Cadieux J, Firszt JB. Quantification of speech-in-noise and sound localisation abilities in children with unilateral hearing loss and comparison to normal hearing peers. Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(Suppl. 1):31–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vannson N, James C, Fraysse B, et al. Quality of life and auditory performance in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(Suppl. 1):38–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bess FH, Tharpe AM, Gibler AM. Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1986;7(1):20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higson JM, Stephenson H, Haggard MP. Binaural summation of the acoustic reflex. Ear Hear. 1996;17(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawool VW, Parrill M. Objective evaluation of binaural summation through acoustic reflex measures. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(7):493–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whilby S, Florentine M, Wagner E, et al. Monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones in normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119(6):3931–3939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein M, Florentine M. Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers. Ear Hear. 2009;30(2):234–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari M, Panahi R, Valadbeigi A, et al. Speech-in-noise perception ability can be related to auditory efferent pathway function: a comparative study in reading impaired and normal reading children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(2):209–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behtani L, Fuente A, Ianiszewski A, et al. Right-ear advantage for unaided and aided speech perception in noise in older adults. J Int Adv Otol. 2021;17(2):115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks DD, Carterette EC. Intelligibility of speech presented to the right or left ear in binaural noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1966;39(2):401–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar UA, Vanaja CS. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear Hear. 2004;25(2):142–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtyrov Y, Kujala T, Ilmoniemi RJ, et al. Noise affects speech-signal processing differently in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuroreport. 1999;10(10):2189–2192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat SP, Carter PH. Efferent-induced change in human cochlear compression and its influence on masking of tones. Neurosci Lett. 2010;485(2):94–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan JJ Jr. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear. 2006;27(6):589–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidelman GM, Bhagat SP. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking’ and speech-in-noise listening benefits. Neuroreport. 2015;26(8):483–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garinis AC, Glattke T, Cone BK. The MOC reflex during active listening to speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(5):1464–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing D, Gong Q. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission. Neuroreport. 2017;28(13):775–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, et al. Development and evaluation of the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(Suppl. 2):51–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kollmeier B, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, et al. The multilingual matrix test: principles, applications, and comparison across languages: a review. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(Suppl. 2):3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilaonitkul W, Guinan JJ Jr. Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2009;10(3):459–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertes IB, Johnson KM, Dinger ZA. Olivocochlear efferent contributions to speech-in-noise recognition across signal-to-noise ratios. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019;145(3):1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertes IB, Wilbanks EC, Leek MR. Olivocochlear efferent activity is associated with the slope of the psychometric function of speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear. 2018;39(3):583–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger YS, Cone-Wesson B. Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization. Science. 2004;305(5690):1581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philibert B, Veuillet E, Collet L. Functional asymmetries of crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear efferent pathways in humans. Neurosci Lett. 1998;253(2):99–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai Y, Husain FT. Right-ear advantage for speech-in-noise recognition in patients with nonlateralized tinnitus and normal hearing sensitivity. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018;19(2):211–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motlagh Zadeh L, Silbert NH, Sternasty K, et al. Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(47):23753–23759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery RW, Spratford M, Kirby B, et al. Individual differences in language and working memory affect children’s speech recognition in noise. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(5):306–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner M, Ronnberg J, Lunner T. Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22(3):156–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alain C, Du Y, Bernstein LJ, et al. Listening under difficult conditions: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(7):2695–2709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence RJ, Wiggins IM, Anderson CA, et al. Cortical correlates of speech intelligibility measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Hear Res. 2018;370:53–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence RJ, Wiggins IM, Hodgson JC, et al. Evaluating cortical responses to speech in children: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Hear Res. 2021;401:108155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar