Working memory and listening fatigue in cochlear implantation

References

• Mattys SL, Davis MH, Bradlow AR, et al. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: a review. Lang Cogn Process. 2012;27(7–8):953–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Jansma EP, et al. Effects of hearing impairment and hearing aid amplification on listening effort: a systematic review. Ear Hear. 2017;38(3):267–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Lunner T, et al. When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise. Noise Health. 2010;12(49):263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke M, Strauß-Schier A, Kludt E, et al. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Hear Res. 2017;348:112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi S, Lidestam B, Saremi A, et al. Gated auditory speech perception: effects of listening conditions and cognitive capacity. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni DB, Cleary M. Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2003;24(1 Suppl):106S–120S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni DB, Geers AE. Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000;185:92–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson DR, Titterington J, Henry A, et al. Auditory sensory memory and working memory processes in children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12(2):65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB, Harris MS, et al. Profiles of verbal working memory growth predict speech and language development in children with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(3):805–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE. Eriksholm workshop on hearing impairment and cognitive energy. Ear Hear. 2016;37(Suppl 1):1S–4S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahneman D. 1973. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGarrigle R, Munro KJ, Dawes P, et al. Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British society of audiology cognition in hearing special interest group ‘white paper’. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(7):433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman SM, Fathalla A, Shehat M. Development of arabic staggered spondee words (SSW) test. Proceeding of 8th Ain Shams Medical Congress; Cairo; 1985. p. 1220–1246.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman SM. Speech discrimination audiometry using arabic phonetically-balanced words. Ain Shams Med J. 1976;27:27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Leung JL, Lee GT, Lam YH, et al. The use of the digit span test in screening for cognitive impairment in acute medical inpatients. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011;23(10):1569–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen HJ, De Vries J, Van Heck GL. Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: the fatigue assessment scale. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54(4):345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhanbali S, Dawes P, Lloyd S, et al. Self-reported listening-related effort and fatigue in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear. 2017;38(1):e39–e48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A, Tun PA. Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(7):548–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Latif KH, Meister H. Speech recognition and listening effort in cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing listeners. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:725412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaltz Y, Bugannim Y, Zechoval D, et al. Listening in noise remains a significant challenge for cochlear implant users: evidence from early deafened and those with progressive hearing loss compared to peers with normal hearing. JCM. 2020;9(5):1381.
   Google Scholar
• Perreau AE, Wu YH, Tatge B, et al. Listening effort measured in adults with normal hearing and cochlear implants. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017;28(8):685–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YH, Stangl E, Zhang X, et al. Psychometric functions of dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort. Ear Hear. 2016;37(6):660–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Holmer E, Rudner M. Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding. Int J Audiol. 2019;58(5):247–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkholder RA, Pisoni DB. Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation. J Exp Child Psychol. 2003;85(1):63–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd RK, Hardie NA. Deafness-induced changes in the auditory pathway: implications for cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2001;6(6):305–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryugo DK, Rosenbaum BT, Kim PJ, et al. Single unit recordings in the auditory nerve of congenitally deaf white cats: morphological correlates in the cochlea and cochlear nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1998;397(4):532–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry AF, Hale S. Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biol Psychol. 2000;54(1–3):1–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes SE, Hutchings HA, Rapport FL, et al. Social connectedness and perceived listening effort in adult cochlear implant users: a grounded theory to establish content validity for a new patient-reported outcome measure. Ear Hear. 2018;39(5):922–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes KC, Galvin KL. Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013;14(3):121–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Werfel KL, Hendricks AE. The relation between child versus parent report of chronic fatigue and language/literacy skills in school-age children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2016;37(2):216–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby BW, Werfel K, Camarata S, et al. Subjective fatigue in children with hearing loss: some preliminary findings. Am J Audiol. 2014;23(1):129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey R. 2013. The psychology of fatigue: work, effort and control. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey J, von Hapsburg D, Seeman S. Cognitive function predicts listening effort performance during complex tasks in normally aging adults. Noise Health. 2017;19(91):254–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua H, Emilsson M, Kähäri K, et al. The impact of different background noises: effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance in employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(9):859–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Karlsson E, Waechter S, et al. Listening effort: order effects and core executive functions. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018;29(8):734–747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraser S, Gagné JP, Alepins M, et al. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(1):18–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin PA, Gagné JP. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise. Int J Audiol. 2011;50(11):786–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility. Ear Hear. 2010;31(4):480–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube I, Haeder K, Imbery C, et al. Subjective listening effort and electrodermal activity in listening situations with reverberation and noise. Trends Hear. 2016;20:2331216516667734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou EM, Ricketts TA. The relationship between speech recognition, behavioural listening effort, and subjective ratings. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(6):457–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar