53
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Test-retest reliability of suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) in healthy individuals

, , & ORCID Icon

References

  • MacDougall HG, Weber KP, McGarvie LA, et al. The video head impulse test: diagnostic accuracy in peripheral vestibulopathy. Neurology. 2009;73(14):1134–1141.
  • Pogson JM, Taylor RL, McGarvie LA, et al. Head impulse compensatory saccades: visual dependence is most evident in bilateral vestibular loss. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227406.
  • Curthoys IS, Manzari L. Clinical application of the head impulse test of semicircular canal function. Hear Balance Commun. 2017;15(3):113–126.
  • Starkov D, Vermorken B, Van Dooren TS, et al. The effect of different head movement paradigms on Vestibulo-Ocular reflex gain and saccadic eye responses in the suppression head impulse test in healthy adult volunteers. Front Neurol. 2021;12:729081. Published 2021 Sep 22.
  • Chen L, Halmagyi GM. Video head impulse testing: from bench to bedside. Semin Neurol. 2020;40(1):5–17.
  • Shen Q, Magnani C, Sterkers O, et al. Saccadic velocity in the new suppression head impulse test: a new indicator of horizontal vestibular canal paresis and of vestibular compensation. Front Neurol. 2016;7:160.
  • MacDougall HG, McGarvie LA, Halmagyi GM, et al. A new saccadic indicator of peripheral vestibular function based on the video head impulse test. Neurology. 2016;87(4):410–418.
  • van de Berg R, Rosengren S, Kingma H. Laboratory examinations for the vestibular system. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31(1):111–116.
  • Rey-Martinez J. Validity of wavelet transforms for analysis of video head impulse test (vHIT) results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(12):4241–4249.
  • Rey-Martinez J, Thomas-Arrizabalaga I, Espinosa-Sanchez JM, et al. Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain values in the suppression head impulse test of healthy subjects. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(10):2383–2389.
  • Devantier L, Hoskison E, Ovesen T, et al. Suppression head impulse paradigm in healthy adolescents - A novel variant of the head impulse test. J Vestib Res. 2018;28(3-4):311–317.
  • Roh KJ, Kim JY, Son EJ. Comparison of suppression head impulse and conventional head impulse test protocols. Res Vestib Sci. 2019;18(4):91–97.
  • Ross LM, Helminski JO. Test-retest and interrater reliability of the video head impulse test in the pediatric population. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(5):558–563.
  • Bansal S, Sinha SK. Assessment of VOR gain function and its test-retest reliability in normal hearing individuals. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(10):3167–3173.
  • Singh NK, Govindaswamy R, Jagadish N. Test-Retest reliability of video head impulse test in healthy individuals and individuals with dizziness. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019;30(9):744–752.
  • Carhart R, Jerger JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord. 1959;24(4):330–345.
  • Casani AP, Canelli R, Lazzerini F, et al. Prognosis after acute unilateral vestibulopathy: usefulness of the suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP). J Vestib Res. 2021;31(6):531–540.
  • Hawkins KE, Rey-Martinez J, Chiarovano E, et al. Suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) characteristics in people with parkinson’s disease compared to healthy controls. Exp Brain Res. 2021;239(6):1853–1862.
  • Manzari L, Tramontano M. Suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) in evaluating the vestibulo-saccadic interaction in patients with vestibular neuritis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(11):3205–3212.
  • Park JS, Lee JY, Nam W, et al. Comparing the suppression head impulse paradigm and the head impulse paradigm in vestibular neuritis. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(1):e76–e82.
  • de Waele C, Shen Q, Magnani C, et al. A novel saccadic strategy revealed by suppression head impulse testing of patients with bilateral vestibular loss. Front Neurol. 2017;8:419.
  • Murnane O, Mabrey H, Pearson A, et al. Normative data and test-retest reliability of the SYNAPSYS video head impulse test. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(3):244–252.
  • Mutlu B, Cesur S, Topçu MT, et al. Evaluation of interexaminer variability in video head impulse test results. J Am Acad Audiol. 2020;31(8):613–619.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.