1,753
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Patient involvement in healthcare professional practice – a question about knowledge

Article: 1403258 | Received 25 Jul 2017, Accepted 06 Nov 2017, Published online: 20 Nov 2017

References

  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Consumers. Eurobarometer qualitative study – patient involvement. Aggregate Report; 2012.
  • Norlyk A, Harder I. Recovering at home: participating in a fast-track colon cancer surgery programme. Nurs Inq. 2011;18(2):1–9.
  • Holen M, Ahrenkiel A. ’After all, you should rather want to be at home’. Responsibility as a means to patient involvement in the Danish health system. J Soc Work Pract. 2011;25(3):297–310.
  • Brorholt G, Nielsen KVL, Kjellberg PK. Borgernes sundhedsvæsen – frontpersonalets perspektiv [The Citizens’ health care system – perspective of the floor-level staff]. Copenhagen: Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning; 2015. Danish.
  • Jo før – jo bedre. Tidlig diagnose, bedre behandling og flere gode leveår for alle [The sooner - the better. Early diagnosis, better treatment, and more good years for everybody]. Copenhagen: Regeringen; 2014. Danish.
  • Fudge N, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. Comment BMJ. 2008;336(7641):405–406. BMJ.
  • Helgesen AK. Patient participation in everyday life in special care units for persona with dementia [dissertation]. Karlstad (SE): Karlstad University Studies; 2013.
  • Armstrong N, Herbert G, Aveling E-L, et al. Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement. Health Expect. 2013;16(3):e36–47.
  • Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment orscreening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
  • Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thompson R, et al. Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–1367.
  • Coulter A. Patient Engagement – what Works?. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012;35(2):80–89.
  • Jensen UJ. Sygdomsbegreber i praksis [Concepts of illness in practice]. Copenhagen (DK): Munksgaard; 1998. Danish.
  • Kristiansen TM, Antoft R, Primdahl J, et al. The Significance of Everyday Life – an Ethnographic Study of Participation in Group-based Patient Education. Adv Appl Sociol. 2015;5(2):81–93.
  • Ørtenblad L, Jønsson AR, Miller L. Komplekse liv: patientinddragelse som vej til et bedre hverdagsliv for multisyge? [Complex lives: patient involvement as a way to a better everyday life for patients with multiple diseases?]. Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund. 2015;(22):83–101. Danish.
  • Aagaard T. Hverdagsliv med sygdom – patienters kulturelle perspektiver på sundhedspraksis i Grønland [Everyday Life with Illness – patients’ Cultural Perspectives on Healthcare Practice in Greenland]. Inussuk – Arktisk Forskningsjournal. 2015;(3):1–222. Danish.
  • Holzkamp K. Daglig livsførelse som subjektvidenskabeligt grundkoncept [Conduct of everyday life as founding concept of a science of subjectivity]. Nordiske Udkast. 1998;26(2):3–31. Danish.
  • Dreier O. Psychotherapy in everyday life. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  • Dreier O. Psykosocial behandling – en teori om et praksisområde [Psychosocial treatment – a theory about a practice area]. Copenhagen (DK): Dansk Psykologisk forlag; 2002. Danish.
  • Andenaes A. Fra undersøgelsesobjekt til medforsker? Livsformsintervju med 4-5-åringer [From object of investigation to co-researcher? Life-form interviews with 4-5 year old children]. Nord Psykol. 1991;43(4):274–292. Norwegian.
  • Walther G. Præsentation og kritik af Werner Mangolds gruppediskussionsmetode og dens konkrete anvendelse i et empirisk landindustriarbejderbevidsthedsstudie [Presentation and critics of Werner Mangold’s groupdiscussion method and it’s concrete application in an empirical study of rural industrial workers’ consciousness]. In: Broch T, Krarup K, Larsen PK, et al., editors. Kvalitative metoder i dansk samfundsforskning [Qualitative methods in Danish social research]. Copenhagen (DK): Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne; 1979. p. 50. Danish.
  • Halkier B. Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qual Res. 2010;10(1):71–89.
  • Aagaard T. Betingelses-, betydnings- og begrundelsesanalyse [Analysis of conditions, meanings and reasons]. In: Hounsgaard L, Gildberg FA, editors. Håndbog i kvalitative analysemetoder inden for sundhedsforskning [Handbook in qualitative analysis methods in health research]. Aarhus (DK): Forlaget Klim; Forthcoming 2017/18. Danish.
  • Pisinger C. Hverdagslivet for borgere med kronisk sygdom [Everyday life for citizens with chronical disease]. Glostrup: Forskningscenter for forebyggelse og sundhed og Trygfonden; 2016. Danish.
  • Departementet for Sundhed og Infrastruktur. Kræftplan for Grønland 2013 [Cancerplan for Greenland 2013]. Nuuk: Naalakkersuisut; 2013. Danish.
  • Cullberg J. Krise og udvikling [Crisis and development]. 5 ed. Copenhagen (DK): Gyldendal Akademisk; 2007. Danish.
  • Schwandt T. Evaluating holistic rehabilitation praxis. Oslo (NO): Kommuneforlaget; 2004.
  • Lindseth A, Norberg A. A Phenomenological Hermeneutical Method for Researching Lived Experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18(2):145–153.
  • Norlyk A, Martinsen B, Dahlberg K. Getting to Know Patients’ Lived Space. Indo-Pac J Phenomenol. 2013;13(2):1–12.
  • Marshall A, Kitson A, Zeitz K. Patients’ views of patient-centred care: a phenomenological case study in one surgical unit.. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(12):2664–2673.
  • Thorgaard K. Epistemologi, Evidensbasering og Patientperspektiver [Epistemology, Evidence-basing and Patient-perspectives]. Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund. 2009;6(10):99–116. Danish.