Discourse, genre and curriculum

References

• Addison, J., & Steele, R. (2018). The spectator. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12030.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, O. Y. (2009). Representation, ideology, and the form of the essay. Writing & Pedagogy, 1(1).
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, F. (2000). The essayes or counsels, civill and morall. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadbourne, R. M. (1983). A puzzling literary genre: Comparative views of the essay. Comparative Literature Studies, 20(2), 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (1997). An introduction to genre theory. Retrieved from http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/intgenre/chandler_genre_theory.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cixous, H. (1991). Coming to writing’ and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. (1986). History and genre. New Literary History, 17(2), 203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (2001). Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J., & Ronell, A. (1980). The law of genre. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 55–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. (2006). Thought and reality. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Feuer, J. (1992). Genre study and television. In R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse, reassembled: television and contemporary criticism (pp. 138–159). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fjällbrant, N. (1997). Scholarly communication - historical development and new possibilities. Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences, Paper 5. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/1997/papers/5
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1969/2002). The Archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1981). Order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 48–78). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, N. (1957). The anatomy of criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Landa, J. A. (2014). Notes on ‘The order of discourse’. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2439772
   Google Scholar
• Genette, G. (1992). The architext: An introduction. Berkeley: Unievrsity of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans). London: SCM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P., Ryberg, T., Knox, J., Lacković, N., Hayes, S., Suoranta, J., … Gibbons, A. (2018). Postdigital dialogue. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1). doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (1759). The critic (Part 1). The idler, 60, Saturday, 9th June. Retrieved from https://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/johnsons/idler/chap60.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kaufer, D. S., & Carley, K. M. (1993). The influence of print on sociocultural organization and change. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86(1), 65–79. doi: 10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith Sawyer, R. (2010). A discourse on discourse: An archeological history of an intellectual concept. Cultural Studies, 16(3), 433–456. doi:10.1080/09502380210128324
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1988). Communication and culture: An introduction. Kensington: New South Wales University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1689). An essay concerning human understanding. Retrieved from https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/l/locke/john/l81u/contents.html
   Google Scholar
• Lukàcs, G. (1974). Soul and form. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2018). Reclaiming the present or a return to the ash heap of the future? Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1). doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0015-6
   Google Scholar
• Montaigne, M. (1580/1993). Essays. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. (1999). After the disciplines: The emergence of cultural studies. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2018). Critical philosophy of the postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1). doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0004-9
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2018). The digital University: A dialogue and Manifesto. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., … Roberts, P. (2016). Toward a philosophy of academic publishing. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(14), 1401–1425. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2016.1240987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Roberts, P. (2012). The virtues of openness: Education, science and scholarship in the digital age. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2006). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses (5th ed). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, R. (2000). Film theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1949). Theory of literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.
   Google Scholar