Curriculum, text and forms of textuality

References

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1929/1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s art. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1977). From work to text. In R. Barthes (Ed.), Image-music-text (pp. 155–164). London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Barwell, G. (2005). Original, authentic, copy: Conceptual issues in digital texts. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 20(4), 415–424. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqi046
   Google Scholar
• Borges, J. L. (1941). The garden of forking paths. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/TheGardenOfForkingPathsJorgeLuisBorges1941/The-Garden-of-Forking-Paths-Jorge-Luis-Borges-1941_djvu.txt
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Humanities Festival. (2016). On Julia Kristeva’s Couch. [YouTube Video]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/b-AzikJn_uc
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004/1980). A thousand plateaus (Brian Massumi, Trans.). London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Eason, G. (2011, October 19). Digital textbooks open a new chapter. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-15175962
   Google Scholar
• Felluga, D. (2018). Modules on Kristeva: On the abject. Retrieved from https://www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/psychoanalysis/kristevaabject.html
   Google Scholar
• Ferenčík, M. (2004). A survey of English stylistics. Prešove: Prešovská univerzita.
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P., Ryberg, T., Knox, J., Lacković, N., Hayes, S., Suoranta, J., … Gibbons, A. (2018). Postdigital dialogue. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1). doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x
   Google Scholar
• Kilbride, L. (2018). Byatt: Intertextuality. Retrieved from https://www.english.cam.ac.uk/cambridgeauthors/byatt-intertextuality/
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1966/1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 34–61). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1969/1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• London College of Communication. (2018). The future of text symposium III. Retrieved from http://www.thefutureoftext.org/futureoftext2013.html
   Google Scholar
• Mayrath, M., Nihalani, P., & Perkins, S. (2011, March 29). Digital texts and the future of education: Why books? Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/3/digital-texts-and-the-future-of-education-why-books
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2018). Reclaiming the present or a return to the ash heap of the future? Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1). doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0015-6
   Google Scholar
• Media Access Australia. (2012). Captions and the Australian curriculum. Retrieved from https://mediaaccess.org.au/education/hearing-impairment-deafness/teacher-information-hearing/captions-and-the-australian-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D. (2012). Borges and the multiverse: Some further thoughts. Bulletin of Spanish Studies, 89(6), 925–942. doi: 10.1080/14753820.2012.712326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. H. (1965). Complex information processing. Proceedings of the ACM 20th National Conference. doi: 10.1145/800197.806036
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. (2013). Institutions, semiotics and the politics of subjectivity. In B. Dillet, R. Porter, & I. Mackenzie (Eds.), The Edinburgh companion to poststructuralism (pp. 368–383). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2018). Critical philosophy of the postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1). doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0004-9
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2018a). The digital university: A dialogue and manifesto. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2018b). The curious relationships between discourse, genre and curriculum. Open Review of Educational Research. 5(1).
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2006). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses (5th ed.). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2009). The worldliness of a cosmopolitan education: Passionate lives in public service. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2011). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, Currere, and the recurring question of the subject. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (Ed.). (2014). International handbook of curriculum research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Saussure, F. (2011). Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1949). Theory of literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. (1996). Orality and hypertext: An interview with Ted Nelson. Retrieved from https://www.ics.uci.edu/~ejw/csr/nelson_pg.html
   Google Scholar