200
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REGULAR ARTICLES

Effects of Shared Attention on joint language production across processing stages

, , &
Pages 203-214 | Received 13 Feb 2023, Accepted 08 Sep 2023, Published online: 26 Sep 2023

References

  • Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: Sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation Cerebrale, 211(3–4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9
  • Bäss, P., & Prinz, W. (2015). My partner is also on my mind: Social context modulates the N1 response. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 105–113, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4092-9.
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Baus, C., Sebanz, N., de la Fuente, V., Branzi, F. M., Martin, C., & Costa, A. (2014). On predicting others’ words: Electrophysiological evidence of prediction in speech production. Cognition, 133(2), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.006
  • Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2209–2216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551162
  • Cirillo, G., Runnqvist, E., Strijkers, K., Nguyen, N., & Baus, C. (2022). Conceptual alignment in a joint picture-naming task performed with a social robot. Cognition, 227, 105–213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105213.
  • Connine, C. M., & Titone, D. (1996). Phoneme monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387042
  • Eitam, B., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a Representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00309.x
  • Elekes, F., Bródy, G., Halász, E., & Király, I. (2016). Enhanced encoding of the co-actor’s target stimuli during a shared non-motor task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(12), 2376–2389. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1120332
  • Elekes, F., & Sebanz, N. (2020). Effects of a partner’s task on memory for content and source. Cognition, 198, 104–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104221.
  • Eskenazi, T., Doerrfeld, A., Logan, G. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013). Your words are my words: Effects of acting together on encoding. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 1026–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.725058
  • Ferraro, L., Iani, C., Mariani, M., Milanese, N., & Rubichi, S. (2011). Facilitation and interference components in the joint Simon task. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2711-2
  • Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (1989). Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects. Memory & Cognition, 17(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197063
  • Gambi, C., Van de Cavey, J., & Pickering, M. J. (2015). Interference in joint picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037438
  • Hauk, O. (2016). Only time will tell—Why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1072–1079. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0873-9
  • Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3158
  • Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
  • Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1-2), 101–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
  • Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: theory and data. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 59–101). Elsevier.
  • Kuhlen, A. K., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2017). Having a task partner affects lexical retrieval: Spoken word production in shared task settings. Cognition, 166, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.024
  • Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Gambi, C. (2022). Interference in the shared-Stroop task: A comparison of self- and other-monitoring. Royal Society Open Science, 9(4), 220107. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220107
  • Sakata, C., Ueda, Y., & Moriguchi, Y. (2023). Visual memory of a co-actor’s target during joint search. Psychological Research, 87(7), 2068–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01819-7
  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
  • Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88(3), B11–B21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00043-X
  • Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234
  • Shteynberg, G. (2010). A silent emergence of culture: The social tuning effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 683–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019573
  • Shteynberg, G. (2015). Shared attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615589104
  • Shteynberg, G. (2018). A collective perspective: Shared attention and the mind. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.007
  • Shteynberg, G., & Apfelbaum, E. P. (2013). The power of shared experience: Simultaneous observation with similar others facilitates social learning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613479807
  • Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Apfelbaum, E. P., Larsen, J. T., Galinsky, A. D., & Roese, N. J. (2014). Feeling more together: Group attention intensifies emotion. Emotion, 14(6), 1102–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037697
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
  • Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2011). Riding the lexical speedway: A critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00356
  • Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Self-memory biases in explicit and incidental encoding of trait adjectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 1040–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.004
  • van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 787–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.787
  • Vlainic, E., Liepelt, R., Colzato, L., Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2010). The virtual Co-actor: The social simon effect does not rely on online feedback from the other. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208
  • Wagner, U., Giesen, A., Knausenberger, J., & Echterhoff, G. (2017). The joint action effect on memory as a social phenomenon: The role of cued attention and psychological distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01697
  • Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of Co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0057-0
  • Yamaguchi, M., Clarke, E. L., & Egan, D. L. (2018). Is your color My color? Dividing the labor of the stroop task between Co-actors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1407. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01407

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.