Event-related potentials and brain oscillations reflect unbalanced allocation of retrieval and integration efforts in sentence comprehension

References

• Aurnhammer, C., Delogu, F., Brouwer, H., & Crocker, M. W. (2023). The P600 as a continuous index of integration effort. Psychophysiology, 60(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aurnhammer, C., Delogu, F., Schulz, M., Brouwer, H., & Crocker, M. W. (2021). Retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) in expectation-based comprehension. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0257430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başar-Eroglu, C., Başar, E., Demiralp, T., & Schürmann, M. (1992). P300-respanse: Possible psychophysiological correlates in delta and theta frequency channels. A review.
   Google Scholar
• Başar-Eroglu, C., & Demiralp, T. (2001). Event-related theta oscillations: An integrative and comparative approach in the human and animal brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 39(2-3), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00140-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Progress in brain research. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59012-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Frequency-based segregation of syntactic and semantic unification during online sentence level language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(11), 2095–2107. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., Magyari, L., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1333–1347. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., Mazaheri, A., & Jensen, O. (2011). Beyond ERPs. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0024
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., Oostenveld, R., Jensen, O., & Hagoort, P. (2008). I see what you mean: Theta power increases are involved in the retrieval of lexical semantic information. Brain and Language, 106(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Van Berkum, J. J. A., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Event-related theta power increases in the human EEG during online sentence processing. Neuroscience Letters, 323(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02535-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–352). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960244000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A. D., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. Neuroimage, 26(1), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braeutigam, S., Bailey, A. J., & Swithenby, S. J. (2001). Phase-locked gamma band responses to semantic violation stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00055-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Crocker, M. W., Venhuizen, N. J., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2017). A neurocomputational model of the N400 and the P600 in language processing. Cognitive Science, 41(S6), 1318–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brouwer, H., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2013). A time and place for language comprehension: Mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulut, T., Cheng, S.-K., Xu, K.-Y., Hung, D. L., & Wu, D. H. (2018). Is there a processing preference for object relative clauses in Chinese? Evidence from ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 995. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, A. P., & Gruzelier, J. H. (1997). Localization of word and face recognition memory using topographical EEG. Psychophysiology, 34(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02410.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary, K. K., Schlesewsky, M., Roehm, D., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2009). The N400 as a correlate of interpretively relevant linguistic rules: Evidence from Hindi. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 3012–3022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coopmans, C. W., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2020). Dissociating activation and integration of discourse referents: Evidence from ERPs and oscillations. Cortex, 126, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2007). An inverse relation between event-related and time–frequency violation responses in sentence processing. Brain Research, 1158, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delogu, F., Brouwer, H., & Crocker, M. W. (2019). Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension. Brain and Cognition, 135, 103569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryer, M. (2013). Order of relative clause and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (Eds.), WALS online (v2020.3) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, S. N., Conway, C. M., & Özçalışkan, Ş. (2020). Semantic P600—but not N400—effects index crosslinguistic variability in speakers’ expectancies for expression of motion. Neuropsychologia, 149, 107638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etard, O., & Reichenbach, T. (2019). Neural speech tracking in the theta and in the delta frequency band differentially encode clarity and comprehension of speech in noise. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(29), 5750–5759. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1828-18.2019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felser, C., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (2003). Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German. Brain and Language, 87(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5(4), 519–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Alter, K. (2004). Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language, 89(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00351-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 16(12), 1709–1717. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Singer, W. (2015). Grounding language processing on basic neurophysiological principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2001). The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. Neuroreport, 12(15), 3391–3394. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200110290-00048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). The resolution of case conflicts from a neurophysiological perspective. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(2), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao, R., Peterson, E. J., & Voytek, B. (2017). Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials. NeuroImage, 158, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., McEvoy, L., & Yu, D. (1997). High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: Effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cerebral Cortex, 7(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/7.4.374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, Language, Brain, 2000, 95–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., & Wu, H.-H. I. (2013). Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1-2), 125–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.536656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902965951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011). Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: A critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology, 48(12), 1711–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01273.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort P. (2019). The neurobiology of language beyond single-word processing. Science, 366(6461), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hald, L. A., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing. Brain and Language, 96(1), 90–105. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Giraud, A.-L., & Clarke, A. (2017). Brain oscillations in language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 533–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1297842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, C. S., Rach, S., Neuling, T., & Strüber, D. (2013). Transcranial alternating current stimulation: A review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeks, J. C., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during Reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600386084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who Did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klimesch, W. (2012). Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, C. M., Sillanmäki, L., Koivisto, M., Saarela, C., Häggqvist, A., Laine, M., & Hämäläinen, H. (2000). The effects of memory load on event-related EEG desynchronization and synchronization. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111(11), 2071–2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00429-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnke, P., Meyer, L., Friederici, A. D., & Hartwigsen, G. (2017). Left posterior inferior frontal gyrus is causally involved in reordering during sentence processing. Neuroimage, 148, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Holcomb, P. J., Sitnikova, T., Greve, D., Dale, A. M., & Caplan, D. (2003). Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321208204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. K., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994–2005). In M Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 659–724). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., & Bastiaansen, M. (2015). A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension. Cortex, 68, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Schoffelen, J., Bastiaansen, M., & Schriefers, H. (2023). Is beta in agreement with the relatives? Using relative clause sentences to investigate MEG beta power dynamics during sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 60(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar (Vol. 3). Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Jin, P., Ding, N., & Tian, X. (2023). Delta-band neural tracking primarily reflects rule-based chunking instead of semantic relatedness between words. Cerebral Cortex, 33(8), 4448–4458. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M. J., Brier, M. R., & Ferree, T. C. (2010). EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships. Brain and Language, 114(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2020). The cortical organization of syntax. Cerebral Cortex, 30(3), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23(4), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellem, M. S., Friedman, R. B., & Medvedev, A. V. (2013). Gamma- and theta-band synchronization during semantic priming reflect local and long-range lexical–semantic networks. Brain and Language, 127(3), 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Henry, M. J., Gaston, P., Schmuck, N., & Friederici, A. D. (2016). Linguistic bias modulates interpretation of speech via neural delta-band oscillations. Cerebral Cortex, 27(9), 4293–4302. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. L., Hirotani, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners. BMC Neuroscience, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B. M., & Johannes, S. (1998). Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia, 36(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00119-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Martin, A. E. (2017). Neural oscillations and a nascent corticohippocampal theory of reference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(5), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M. (2003). A subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000172
   Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, J. L., Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. (2011). Filler-Gap processing in mandarin relative clauses: Evidence from event-related potentials. In H. Yamashita, Y. Hirose, & J. Packard (Eds.), Processing and producing head-final structures (Vol. 38, pp. 219–240). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9213-7_11
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Abada, S. H. (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pu, M.-M. (2007). The distribution of relative clauses in Chinese discourse. Discourse Processes, 43(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen. (2019). The neural basis of combinatory syntax and semantics. Science, 366(6461), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Roehm, D. (2004). Waves and words: Oscillatory activity and language processing [doctoral dissertation]. University of Marburg.
   Google Scholar
• Roehm, D., Winkler, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Klimesch, W. (2002). The N400 and delta oscillations: Is there a difference? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement, 134–135.
   Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Dickson, D. S., Norton, J. J. S., Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Alpha and theta band dynamics related to sentential constraint and word expectancy. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1183799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, F., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2014). Working memory and neural oscillations: Alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 16–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. M., Abel, A. D., Ogiela, D. A., Middleton, A. E., & Maguire, M. J. (2016). Developmental differences in beta and theta power during sentence processing. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. M., & Maguire, M. J. (2018). Identifying the relationship between oscillatory dynamics and event-related responses. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 133, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., Bever, T., Hancock, R., & Schmidt, L. (2016). Processing relative clauses in Chinese: Evidence from event-related potentials. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 39, 92–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Y.-T., Cha, J.-H., Tu, J.-Y., Wu, M.-D., & Lin, W.-C. (2016a). Investigating the processing of relative clauses in mandarin Chinese: Evidence from Eye-movement data. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(5), 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9394-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y.-T., Tu, J.-Y., Cha, J.-H., & Wu, M.-D. (2016b). Processing preference toward object-extracted relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese by l1 and l2 speakers: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabullo, Á., Sevilla, Y., Pasqualetti, G., Vernis, S., Segura, E., Yorio, A., Zanutto, S., & Wainselboim, A. (2011). Expectancy modulates a late positive ERP in an artificial grammar task. Brain Research, 1373, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from Eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasishth, S., Chen, Z., Li, Q., & Guo, G. (2013). Processing Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for the subject-relative advantage. PLOS ONE, 8(10), e77006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignali, L., Himmelstoss, N. A., Hawelka, S., Richlan, F., & Hutzler, F. (2016). Oscillatory brain dynamics during sentence Reading: A fixation-related spectral perturbation analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Kolk, H. H., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3810041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H.-L., Yue, W., Li, Q., & Li, J.-R. (2017). An ERP study of the object preference in processing Chinese relative clauses. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 15(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Hagoort, P., & Jensen, O. (2018). Language prediction is reflected by coupling between frontal gamma and posterior alpha oscillations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(3), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Zhu, Z., & Bastiaansen, M. (2012). Integration or predictability? A further specification of the functional role of gamma oscillations in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., Mueller, H., Schack, B., King, J., Kutas, M., & Rappelsberger, P. (2005). Increased neuronal communication accompanying sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., & Mueller, H. M. (2003). The contribution of EEG coherence to the investigation of language. Brain and Language, 85(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00067-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., & Mueller, H. M. (2012). “Too many betas do not spoil the broth”: The role of beta brain oscillations in language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissbart, H., Kandylaki, K. D., & Reichenbach, T. (2020). Cortical tracking of surprisal during continuous speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., Kaiser, E., & Andersen, E. (2012). Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(10), 1489–1524. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.614423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, Y., Dekydtspotter, L., & Newman, S. (2019). When embeddedness matters: Electrophysiological evidence for the role of head noun position in Chinese relative clause processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., Duann, J.-R., Hung, D. L., & Wu, D. H. (2019). Preference for object relative clauses in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from online self-paced Reading time. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., Wu, D. H., & Duann, J.-R. (2020). Dynamic brain connectivity attuned to the complexity of relative clause sentences revealed by a single-trial analysis. Neuroimage, 217, 116920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2006). Contextual constraints on the comprehension of relative clause sentences in Chinese: ERPs evidence. The Special Issue of Brain and Language in Language and Linguistics, 7(3), 697–730.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2010). Sentence integration processes: An ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses. Brain and Language, 112(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar