The effect of constituent frequency and distractor type on learning novel complex words

References

• Alario, F.-X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31(3), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipovic Durdevic, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bah, T. (2007). Inkscape: Guide to a vector drawing program. Prentice Hall Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory & Language, 68(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 937–942. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0120-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Wegener, S., Nation, K., Prokupzcuk, A., Wang, H.-C., & Castles, A. (2021). Learning morphologically complex spoken words: Orthographic expectations of embedded stems are formed prior to print exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 47(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Kezilas, Y., & Grainger, J. (2016). Morpho-orthographic segmentation without semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 533–539. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0927-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37(6), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007, December). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1171–1176. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193108. <Go to ISI>://000251924800022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. C., & Thiessen, E. D. (2015). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review, 37, 66–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2012.635980
   Google Scholar
• Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(45), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havas, V., Waris, O., Vaquero, L., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., & Laine, M. (2015). Morphological learning in a novel language : A cross-language comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(7), 1426–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.983531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Hupp, J. M., Sloutsky, V. M., & Culicover, P. W. (2009). Evidence for a domain-general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(6), 876–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902719267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Polonyi, T., & Abari, K. (2014). More than words: Fast acquisition and generalization of orthographic regularities during novel word learning in adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9259-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(11), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01993-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkx, M., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2011). The acquisition of morphological knowledge investigated through artificial language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(6), 1200–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.538211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirković, J., Seidenberg, M. S., & Joanisse, M. F. (2011). Rules versus statistics: Insights from a highly inflected language. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 638–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01174.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, H., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). Vietnamese compounds show an anti-frequency effect in visual lexical decision. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1054844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45(1), 45–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00001-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (2011). Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can't explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology, 62(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Love, B., & Baayen, R. H. (2013). Learning is not decline: The mental lexicon as a window into cognition across the lifespan. The Mental Lexicon, 8(3), 450–481. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.08ram
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23(7-8), 942–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., McCormick, S. F., Bayliss, L., & Davis, C. J. (2011). Orthography influences perception and production of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(6), 1588–1594. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raviv, L., Lupyan, G., & Green, S. C. (2022, June). How variability shapes learning and generalization. Trends in Cognitive Science, 26(6), 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCoreTeam. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognition, 96(2), 143–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010, Nov). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rott, S. (2007). The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57(2), 165–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., & Wilson, D. P. (2003). From syllables to syntax: Multi-level statistical learning by 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 4(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0402_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (1995). Is human learning rational? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized Set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• St. Clair, M. C., Monaghan, P., & Ramscar, M. (2009). Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink, & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113–137). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477. <Go to ISI>://000221024700007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language & Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903043261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, J., Davis, M. H., Merkx, M., & Rastle, K. (2012). The role of memory consolidation in generalisation of new linguistic information. Cognition, 125(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, J., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2015). From specific examples to general knowledge in language learning. Cognitive Psychology, 79, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S. H., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2019). The effects of context and word exposure frequency on incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. The Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1244217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2020). Retention of new words learned incidentally from reading: Word exposure frequency, L1 marginal glosses, and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 785–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, J., Newport, E. L., Newman, A. J., & Bavelier, D. (2011, February 10). Interplay between morphology and frequency in lexical access: The case of the base frequency effect. Brain Research, 1373, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Taft, M. (2015). The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 904–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar