The impact of chest contouring aesthetics outcomes: a pilot eye tracking study

References

• Herman JL, Flores AR, O’Neill KK. How many adults and youth identify as transgender in the United States? Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. Los Angeles: eScholarship Publishing; 2022 [published 2022 Jun 10, cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4xs990ws.
   Google Scholar
• Lane M, Ives GC, Sluiter EC, et al. Trends in gender-affirming surgery in insured patients in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(4):1. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001738.
   Google Scholar
• Olson-Kennedy J, Warus J, Okonta V, et al. Chest reconstruction and chest dysphoria in transmasculine minors and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(5):431–8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SA, Patel V, Morrison SD, et al. Assessing gender-affirming chest surgery outcomes: does gender identity alter gaze? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(4):1860–1868. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02378-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SC, Morrison SD, Anzai L, et al. Masculinizing top surgery: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(6):679–683. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson L, Whallett EJ, McGregor JC. Transgender patient satisfaction following reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(3):331–334. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustos SS, Forte AJ, Ciudad P, et al. The nipple split sharing vs. conventional nipple graft technique in chest wall masculinization surgery: can we improve patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(5):1478–1486. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01803-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift TC, Elfering L, Greijdanus M, et al. Subcutaneous mastectomy improves satisfaction with body and psychosocial function in trans men: findings of a cross-sectional study using the BODY-Q chest module. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):1125–1132. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen AF, Kaur M, Poulsen L, et al. Development of the BODY-Q chest module evaluating outcomes following chest contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(6):1600–1608. doi: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen AF, Kaur M, Johnson N, et al. International phase I study protocol to develop a patient-reported outcome measure for adolescents and adults receiving gender-affirming treatments (the GENDER-Q). BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e025435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaad M, Dey JK, Al-Mouakeh A, et al. Eye-Tracking technology in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(9):1022–1034. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai LZ, Kwong JW, Azad AD, et al. Where do we look? Assessing gaze patterns in cosmetic face-lift surgery with eye tracking technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(1):63–70. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Burgess A, Waters AJ, et al. A pilot study on using eye tracking to understand assessment of surgical outcomes from clinical photography. J Digit Imaging. 2011;24(5):778–786. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9338-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietruski P, Noszczyk B, Paskal AM, et al. The impact of mastectomy on women’s visual perception of breast aesthetics and symmetry: a pilot eye-tracking study. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(8):850–861. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):891–899. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beesley H, Ullmer H, Holcombe C, et al. How patients evaluate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and why their evaluation often differs from that of their clinicians. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(8):1064–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, et al. Eye tracking of men’s preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(1):51–58. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9601-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman A, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, et al. Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(1):43–50. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9523-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai LZ, Paro JAM, Lee GK, et al. Reply: where do we look? Assessing gaze patterns in breast reconstructive surgery with eye-tracking technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):792e–793e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar