Sensing performance: from Balinese character to Japanese androids

References

• Barry, A., G. Born, and G. Weszkalnys. 2008. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, M. C. 1984. With a Daughter’s Eye: A Memoir of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, M. C. [1972] 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., G. Hidalgo, T. Simon, S. E. Wei, and Y. Sheikh. 2021. “OpenPose: Realtime Multi-person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43 (1): 172–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, A. M. 1999. “Seeing through Transparency: Performativity, Vision and Intent.” Journal for Cultural Research 3 (1): 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. 1994. “The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision.” Critical Inquiry 21 (1): 228–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemeinboeck, P. 2021. “The Aesthetics of Encounter: A Relational-Performative Design Approach to Human-Robot Interaction.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389frobt.2020.577900/full. Accessed 20 February 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. 2010. “Cybernetics.” In Critical Terms for Media Studies, edited by W. J. T. Mitchell and Mark B. N. Hansen, 145–156. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, Stefan. 2001. “Kinship in Hypertext: Transubstantiating Fatherhood and Information Flow in Artificial Life.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, edited by Gillian Feeley-Harnik and Janet Carsten, 116–143. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, C. 2016. “Who Knows? Metacognitive Social Learning Strategies.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (3): 204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikegami, T. 2013. “A Design for Living Technology: Experiments with the Mind Time Machine.” Artificial Life 19 (3–4): 387–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikegami, T. A. Masumori, J. Smith, and N. Maruyama 2021. “Can Mutual Imitation Generate Open-Ended Evolution?” at the 2021 Conference on Artificial Life (ALIFE 2021). http://workshops.alife.org/oee4/. Accessed May 25, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Jacknis, I. 1988. “Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson in Bali: Their Use of Photography and Film.” Cultural Anthropology 3 (2): 160–177.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, S. 2003. Cyberfeminism and Artificial Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laban, R. 1966. Choreutics. London: Dance Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, C. G., ed. 1997. Artificial Life: An Overview. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W. S. and W. Pitts. 1943. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity.” The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5: 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumori, A., N. Maruyama, and T. Ikegami. 2021. “Personogenesis through Imitating Human Behavior in a Humanoid Robot ‘Alter3’.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 165.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 1973. “Techniques of the Body.” Economy and Society 2 (1): 70–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, M. 1976. “For God’s Sake, Margaret.” CoEvolution Quarterly 10 (21): 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. [1975] 2003. “Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words.” In Principles of Visual Anthropology, edited by P. Hockings, 3–10. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. 2016. How to See the World: An Introduction to Images, from Self-Portraits to Selfies, Maps to Movies, and More. London: Hachette UK.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L., and C. Trevarthen. 1986. “The Infant’s Role in Mother–Infant Communications.” Journal of Child Language 13 (1): 15–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, S. J. 2015. “Theater and ALife Art: Modeling Open and Closed Systems.” Artificial Life 21 (3): 344–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Operational Images. 2019. https://operationalimages.cz/. Accessed May 25, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Paglen, Trevor. 2014. “Operational Images.” E-flux. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/59/61130/operational-images/. Accessed 1 April 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Penny, S. 2000. “Agents as Artworks and Agent Design as Artistic Practice.” Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology 19: 395–414.
   Google Scholar
• Pias, C., ed. 2016. Cybernetics – The Macy Conferences 1946–1953: The Complete Transactions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. 2021. “Robot Theater (Rohotto engeki) in Japan: Staging Science Fiction Futures.” Mechademia: Second Arc 14 (1): 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, C. 2022. Sensing Machines: How Sensors Shape Our Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. 2010. Forms of Vitality: Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology, the Arts, Psychotherapy, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taussig, M. 2018. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., and P. Bourgine, eds. 1992. Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar