Machining of different superalloys under MQL using hBN nanofluids

References

• Nishanth BS, Kulkarni VN, Gaitonde VN, A review on conventional and non-conventional machining of titanium and nickel based alloys. AIP conf proc AIP Publ LLC, 2019;2200 (1): 020091.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritz AP. Superalloys for gas turbine engines. Introduction to aerospace materials. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2012. pp. 251–267.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesan K, Devendiran S, Nishanth Purusotham K, et al. Study of machinability performance of Hastelloy-X for nanofluids, dry with coated tools. Mater Manuf Process. 2020;35(7):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivalingam V, Zhuoliang Jie S, Baskaran S, et al. Use of atomized spray cutting fluid technique for the turning of a nickel base superalloy. Mater Manuf Process. 2021;36(3):373–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Q, Ding W, Kuang W, et al. Comparison on grindability and surface integrity in creep feed grinding of GH4169, K403, DZ408 and DD6 nickel-based superalloys. J Manuf Process. 2020;49:175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gialanella S, Malandruccolo A. Aerospace alloys. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Horke K, Meyer A, Singer RF. Metal injection molding (MIM) of nickel-base superalloys. In: Donald FH, Editor. Handbook of metal injection molding. Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 575–608.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar S, Gowthaman S, Jagadeesha T Effect of MQL, wet and dry lubrication on functional behavior of end milled nimonic-263.” . IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng IOP Pub. 2020;912(3):032019.
   Google Scholar
• Ezilarasan C, Nagaraj MS, Kumar AJ, et al. Experimental analysis of process parameters in drilling Nimonic C263 alloy under nano fluid mixed MQL environment. Manufacturing Rev. 2021;8:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugulothu S, Pasam VK. Experimental investigation to study the performance of CNT/MoS 2 hybrid nanofluid in turning of AISI 1040 stee. Aust J Mech Eng. 2020;20:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen B, Gupta MK, Mia M, et al. Performance assessment of minimum quantity castor-palm oil mixtures in hard-milling operation. Materials. 2021;14(1):198. DOI:10.3390/ma14010198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh T, Singh P, Dureja JS, et al. A review of near dry machining/minimum quantity lubrication machining of difficult to machine alloys. IJMMM. 2016;18(3):213–251.
   Google Scholar
• Gajrani KK, Sankar MR. Role of eco-friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining. In: Mayra C, Editor. Gajrani KK, Sankar MR. Materials Forming, Machining and Post Processing. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan V, Sundararajan D Parameter optimization during minimum quantity lubrication turning of inconel 625 alloy with CUO, Al2O3, and CNt nanoparticles dispersed vegetable-oil-based cutting fluid. No. 2019-28-0061. SAE Technical Paper, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Khetre S, Bongale A, Kumar S, et al. Minimum quality lubrication: a comprehensive review. AIP Conf Proc, AIP Pub LLC. 2020:2297(1):020019.
   Google Scholar
• Salem A, Hopkins C, Imad M, et al. Environmental analysis oF sustainable and traditional cooling and lubrication strategies during machining processes. Sustainability. 2020;12(20):8462. DOI:10.3390/su12208462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katna R, Suhaib M, Agrawal N. Nonedible vegetable oil-based cutting fluids for machining processes–a review. Mater Manuf Process. 2020;35(1):1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said Z, Gupta M, Hegab H, et al. A comprehensive review on minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in machining processes using nano-cutting fluids. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;105(5–6):2057–2086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Dixit AR, Mandal A, et al. Emerging application of nanoparticle-enriched cutting fluid in metal removal processes: a review. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2017;39(11):4677–4717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of the physical properties of different vegetable oil-based nanofluids on MQLC grinding temperature of Ni-based alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;89(9–12):3459–3474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minh DT, The LT, Bao NT. Performance of Al2O3 nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication in hard milling of 60si2mn steel using cemented carbide tools. Adv Mech Eng. 2017;9(7):1687814017710618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Jamil M, Wang X, et al. Performance evaluation of vegetable oil-based nano-cutting fluids in environmentally friendly machining of inconel-800 alloy. Materials. 2019;12(17):2792. DOI:10.3390/ma12172792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegab H, Umer U, Soliman M, et al. Effects of nano-cutting fluids on tool performance and chip morphology during machining inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;96(9–12):3449–3458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Dureja JS, Singh H, et al. Environment friendly milling of Inconel-625. IJMSI. 2019;13(4):274–292.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao TC, Vu NC, Tsai MC, et al. Modeling and optimization of machining parameters in milling of INCONEL-800 super alloy considering energy, productivity, and quality using nanoparticle suspended lubrication. Meas Control. 2021;54(5–6):880–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan V, Sundararajan D Turning of Inconel 825 with coated carbide tool applying vegetable-based cutting fluid mixed with CUO, Al2O3, and CNT nanoparticles by MQL. No. 2019-28-0060. SAE Technical Paper, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sundararajan D, Kannan V, Kumar P, et al. Investigation oF machinability characteristics and chip morphology on inconel 718: dry and MQL. No. 2019-28-0066. SAE Technical Paper, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan V, Sundararajan D Investigation of machinability characteristics on turning of Nimonic 90A using Al2O3 and CNT Nanofluids in Groundnut oil. No. 2019-28-0072. SAE Technical Paper, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Rao PV, Rao PV. Comparison between sustainable cryogenic techniques and nano-MQL cooling mode in turning of nickel-based alloy. J Clean Prod. 2019;231:1036–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegab H, Kishawy HA. Towards sustainable machining of Inconel 718 using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. J Manuf Mater. 2018;2(3):50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musavi SH, Davoodi B, Niknam SA. Effects of reinforced nanoparticles with surfactant on surface quality and chip formation morphology in MQL-turning of superalloys. J Manuf Processes. 2019;40:128–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım ÇV, Kıvak T, Sarıkaya M, et al. Evaluation of tool wear, surface roughness/topography and chip morphology when machining of Ni-based alloy 625 under MQL, cryogenic cooling and CryoMQL. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(2):2079–2092.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım ÇV, Sarıkaya M, Kıvak T, et al. The effect of the addition of hBN nanoparticles to nanofluid-MQL on tool wear patterns, tool life, roughness, and temperature in turning of Ni-based Inconel 625. Tribol Int. 2019;134:443–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım ÇV. Experimental comparison of the performance of nanofluids, cryogenic, and hybrid cooling in turning of Inconel 625. Tribol Int. 2019;137:366–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanan KV, Ramesh Babu S, Jebaraj M, et al. Face turning of Incoloy 800 under MQL and nano-MQL environments. Mater Manuf Process. 2021;36(15):1769–1780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhesana MA, Patel KM. Performance assessment of vegetable oil-based nanofluid in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) during machining of Inconel 718. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2021;1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Makhesana MA, Patel KM. Improvement in machining process performance using solid lubricant assisted minimum quantity lubrication. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2021;7:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pathapalli VR, Basam VR, Gudimetta SK, et al. Optimization of machining parameters using WASPAS and MOORA. World J Eng. 2020;17:237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slebi-Acevedo CJ, Pascual-Muñoz P, Lastra-González P, et al. A multi-criteria decision-making analysis for the selection of fibres aimed at reinforcing asphalt concrete mixtures. Int J Pavement Eng. 2021;22(6):763–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safi K, Yallese MA, Belhadi S, et al. Parametric study and multi-criteria optimization during turning of X210Cr12 steel using the desirability function and hybrid Taguchi-WASPAS method. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 2022;236:09544062221086171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar BS, Padmanabhan G, Krishna PV. Experimental investigations of vegetable oil based cutting fluids with extreme pressure additive in machining of AISI 1040 steel. Manuf Sci Technol. 2015;3(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Padmini R, Krishna PV, Rao GK. Effectiveness of vegetable oil based nanofluids as potential cutting fluids in turning AISI 1040 steel. Tribol Int. 2016;94:490–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Chen M, Shen Z. Experimental studies on machinability of six kinds of nickel-based superalloys. IJMMM. 2006;1(3):287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Vardhaman A, Amarnath M, Jhodkar D, et al. Influence of coconut oil on tribological behavior of carbide cutting tool insert during turning operation. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2018;40(9):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Q, Ding W, Kuang W, et al. Comparison on grindability and surface integrity in creep feed grinding of GH4169, K403, DZ408 and DD6 nickel-based superalloys. J Manuf Processes. 2020;49:175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugulothu S, Pasam VK. Experimental investigation to study the performance of CNT/mohybrid nanofluid in turning of AISI 1040 stee. Aust J Mech Eng. 2020;20:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua Y, Liu Z. Experimental investigation of principal residual stress and fatigue performance for turned nickel-based superalloy Inconel 718. Materials. 2018;11(6):879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair A, Kumanan S. Multi-performance optimization of abrasive water jet machining of Inconel 617 using WPCA. Mater Manuf Process. 2017;32(6):693–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahir IS, Schoop J, Kaynak Y, et al. Progress toward modeling and optimization of sustainable machining processes. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2020;142(11).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan K, Ramanujam R. Improvement of machinability using laser-aided hybrid machining for Inconel 718 alloy. Mater Manuf Process. 2016;31(14):1825–1835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Majumder H. Multi-attribute optimisation of submerged arc welding process parameters using Taguchi GRA-PCA hybrid approach. Aust J Mech Eng. 2020;1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abas M, Salah B, Khalid QS, et al. Experimental investigation and statistical evaluation of optimized cutting process parameters and cutting conditions to minimize cutting forces and shape deviations in Al6026-T9. Materials. 2020;13(19):4327. DOI:10.3390/ma13194327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi FH, Fallahnejad R. Imprecise Shannon’s entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy. 2010;12(1):53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi GT, Li G, Cheng YQ. The human all-round development evaluation model based on AHP and standard deviation and empirical study. Chin J Manag. 2010;7:301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J, et al. Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessmen. Elektron Elektrotech. 2012;122(6):3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashgari S, Antuchevičienė J, Delavari A, et al. Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies J. Bus Econ Manag. 2014;15(4):729–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slebi-Acevedo CJ, Pascual-Muñoz P, Lastra-González P, et al. Multi-response optimization of porous asphalt mixtures reinforced with aramid and polyolefin fibers employing the CRITIC-TOPSIS based on Taguchi methodology. Materials. 2019;12(22):3789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuş A, Adalı EA. The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. Opsearch. 2019;56(2):528–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar