Exploring the sign language proficiency of university undergraduate students in a preservices preparation program for teachers of deaf students

References

• Abed, M.G., & Shackelford, T.K. (2020). Educational support for Saudi students with learning disabilities in higher education. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(1), 36–44. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Zoubi, S.M. (2018). The impact of exposure to English language on language acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(4), 151–162. Retreived from http://jallr.ir/index.php/JALLR/article/view/851
   Google Scholar
• Al-Fityani, K., & Padden, C. (2010). Sign languages in the Arab world. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages (pp. 433–450). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511712203.020
   Google Scholar
• Alajlan, M. (2017). Knowledge and attitudes of faculty members at a Saudi university toward deaf and hard of hearing students in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). University of New Orleans], New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2288/
   Google Scholar
• Alamri, G. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs and attitudes about Saudi Arabia sign language. (Order No. 10616872) (Doctoral dissertation). Lamar University-Beaumont. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Alawajee, O. (2021). Influence of Covid-19 on students’ sign language learning in a teacher-preparation program in Saudi Arabia: Moving to e-learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), 1–13. doi:10.30935/cedtech/10886
   Google Scholar
• Aldabas, R.A. (2015). Special education in Saudi Arabia: History and areas for reform. Creative Education, 6(11), 1158–1167. doi:10.4236/ce.2015.611114
   Google Scholar
• Alnahdi, G., & Anastasiou, D. (2020). Recruitment practices for special education faculty: Implications for Saudi universities. SAGE Open, 10(3), 215824402094884. doi:10.1177/2158244020948844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alofi, A.S., Clark, M.D., & Marchut, A.E. (2019). Life stories of Saudi deaf individuals. Psychology, 10(11), 1506–1525. doi:10.4236/psych.2019.1011099
   Google Scholar
• Alotaibi, H.B. (2020). Modern trends for the development of the deanship in the management of students’ affairs in Saudi universities in light of the booming global experiences: A comparative analytical study. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 644–663. Retrieved from https://www.ejmcm.com/article_3188_44dbe87f0dff32e2d7f598b43672f02d.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alshutwi, S.M., Ahmad, A.C., & Lee, L.W. (2020). The impact of inclusion setting on the academic performance, social interaction and self-esteem of deaf and hard of hearing students: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(10), 248–264. doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.10.14
   Google Scholar
• Andzik, N.R., Schaefer, J.M., Nichols, R.T., & Chung, Y.C. (2018). National survey describing and quantifying students with communication needs. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 21(1), 40–47. doi:10.1080/17518423.2017.1339133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, G., Cagle, K., Kurz, K.B., Newell, W., Peterson, R., & Zinza, J.E. (2012). Standards for learning American Sign Language: A project of the American Sign Language Teacher’s Association. Retrieved from http://www.aslta.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/National_ASL_Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ball, C. (2007). The history of American Sign Language interpreting education. (Order No. 3258295) (Doctoral dissertation). Capella University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bambaeeroo, F., & Shokrpour, N. (2017). The impact of the teachers’ non-verbal communication on success in teaching. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(2), 51–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Walters, R.H. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, J.S., & Faniel, K. (2019). Hearing L2 sign language learners. Sign Language Studies, 19(2), 204–224. doi:10.1353/sls.2018.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, J. (2020). University American sign language (ASL) second language learners: Receptive and expressive ASL performance. Journal of Interpretation, 28(1), Article 1. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/joi/vol28/iss1/1/
   Google Scholar
• Beal-Alvarez, J.S., & Scheetz, N.A. (2015). Preservice teacher and interpreter American sign language abilities: Self-evaluations and evaluations of deaf students’ narrative renditions. American Annals of the Deaf, 160(3), 316–333. doi:10.1353/aad.2015.0027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, D., Lee, L., DiCarlo, C., & Burnett, G. (2020). Enhancing brain development in infants and young children: Strategies for caregivers and educators. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, S.B. (2003). Sensitive period effects on the acquisition of language: A study of language development. (Order No. 3118939) (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Connecticut. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis and second language acquisition. In W.E. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 141–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Biwer, F., Oude Egbrink, M.G., Aalten, P., & de Bruin, A.B. (2020). Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education–a mixed-methods study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 186–203. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyes-Braem, P. (1986). Two aspects of psycholinguistic research: Iconicity and temporal structure. Proceedings of the Second European Congress on sign language research; signs of life, Amsterdam, Netherlands. University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, M.T., Ross, D.D., Colón, E.P., & McCallum, C.L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. The Journal of Special Education, 38(4), 242–252. doi:10.1177/00224669050380040601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caselli, N.K., & Pyers, J.E. (2020). Degree and not type of iconicity affects sign language vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(1), 127–139. doi:10.1037/xlm0000713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerney, B.E. (2004). Relayed interpretation from English to American Sign Language via a hearing and a deaf interpreter. (Order No. 3160268) (Doctoral dissertation). Union Institute and University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Pichler, D., & Koulidobrova, H. (2015). Acquisition of sign language as a second language. In M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies in language (pp. 218–229). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190241414.013.14
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V.J. (2010). The relationship between first and second language acquisition revisited. In E. E. Macaro (Ed.), The continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 137–157). London, UK: Continuum. Retrieved from https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/169104
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., & Willingham, D.T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Smith, D. (2019). All learning is social and emotional: Helping students develop essential skills for the classroom and beyond. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• General Authority for Statistics. (2017). Disability survey. Author. Retrieved from https://www.stats.gov.sa/sites/default/files/disability_survey_2017_ar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M.L., Hall, W.C., & Caselli, N.K. (2019). Deaf children need language, not (just) speech. First Language, 39(4), 367–395. doi:10.1177/0142723719834102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamouda, S.B., & Gabsi, W. (2021, November). Arabic sign language recognition: Towards a dual way communication system between deaf and non-deaf people. In 2021 IEEE/ACIS 22nd international conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), Taichung, Taiwan (pp. 37–42). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M.K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126–134. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, M.S. (2018). Deaf/hard of hearing preschool students’ acquisition of language through dyadic and triadic communication contexts. (Order No. 10831186) (Doctoral dissertation). Illinois State University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A.H., & Mercer, S. (Eds). (2020). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters. doi: 10.21832/HIVER3606
   Google Scholar
• Hsing, M.H., & Lowenbraun, S. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions and actions in carrying out communication policies in a public school for the deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 142(1), 34–39. doi:10.1353/aad.2012.0250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, N., & Marshall, K. (2012). Exceptional children and youth (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobowitz, E.L. (2005). American sign language teacher-preparation programs in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 6(1), 76–110. doi:10.1353/sls.2006.0003
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., Satapathy, S.C., Yang, L., Wang, S.H., & Zhang, Y.D. (2020). A survey on artificial intelligence in Chinese sign language recognition. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(12), 9859–9894. doi:10.1007/s13369-020-04758-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B.E., Clark, G.M., & Soltz, D.F. (1997). Characteristics and practices of sign language interpreters in inclusive education programs. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 257–268. doi:10.1177/001440299706300209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargozari, H.R., & Faravani, A. (2018). Behaviorism. In M. Zeraatpishe, A. Faravani, H.R. Kargozar, & M. Azarnoosh (Eds.), Issues in applying SLA theories toward reflective and effective teaching (pp. 3–8). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, M. (1998). Why is learning American sign language a challenge? American Annals of the Deaf, 143(3), 255–259. doi:10.1353/aad.2012.0157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholis, N., Purwowibowo, P., & Ibra, M.A. (2020, March). The total communication learning model to support the effectiveness of social interaction for deaf children. In The 2nd. Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2019) (pp. 482–484). Atlantis Press. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200225.104
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, D.M., Bavanraj, K., Thavananthan, S., Bastiansz, G.M.A.S., Harshanath, S.M.B., & Alosious, J. (2020, December). EasyTalk: A translator for Sri Lankan sign language using machine learning and artificial intelligence. In 2020 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC), Malabe, Sri Lanka (Vol. 1, pp. 506–511). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Leeson, L., Wurm, S., & Vermeerbergen, M., Eds. (2014). Signed language interpreting: Preparation, practice and performance. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315760209.
   Google Scholar
• Leeson, L., van den Bogaerde, B., Rathmann, C., & Haug, T. (2016). Sign languages and the common European framework of reference for languages. In Common reference level descriptors. European Centre for Modern Languages. Retrieved from https://www.ecml.at/portals/1/mtp4/pro-sign/documents/common-reference-level-descriptors-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S.K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American sign language. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lillo-Martin, D., & Henner, J. (2021). Acquisition of sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7(1), 395–419. doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-043020-092357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long, G., Stinson, M., Kelly, R.R., & Liu, Y. (1999). The relationship between teacher sign skills and student evaluations of teacher capability. American Annals of the Deaf, 354–364. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44392629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, R.L., & McKee, D. (1992). What’s so hard about learning ASL? Students’ & teachers’ perceptions. Sign Language Studies, 75(1), 129–157. doi:10.1353/sls.1992.0000
   Google Scholar
• Meir, I., Aronoff, M., Börstell, C., Hwang, S.-O., Ilkbasaran, D., Kastner, I., … Sandler, W. (2017). The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition, 158, 189–207. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A. (2018). Twice-exceptionality in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Policy recommendations for advances in special education. International Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 397–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaraizi, M. (2000). The need for specialist training in the education of deaf children in Greece: Listening to teachers’ perceptions. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 19–38. Retrieved from https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/18912
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, G., Sumer, B., & Ozyurek, A. (2014). Type of iconicity matters: Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition. 36th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (CogSci 2014) (pp. 1114–1119). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-88CB-4
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, G. (2017). Iconicity and sign lexical acquisition: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, S., & Kim, N. (2021). Analysis of worldwide research trends on the impact of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability, 13(14), 7941. doi:10.3390/su13147941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastratis, I., Chatzikonstantinou, C., Konstantinidis, D., Dimitropoulos, K., & Daras, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence technologies for sign language. Sensors, 21(17), 5843. doi:10.3390/s21175843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, R.C., Walker, V.L., & Tapp, M.C. (2021). Teacher preparation in communication instruction for students with extensive support needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(3), 239–254. doi:10.1177/0888406420978606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereltsvaig, A. (2020). Languages of the world. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.4324/9780203430163.
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P., Thompson, R.L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(227), 2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polat, F. (2003). Factors affecting psychosocial adjustment of deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 325–339. doi:10.1093/deafed/eng018.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinto-Pozos, D. (2011). Teaching American sign language to hearing adult learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 137–158. doi:10.1017/S0267190511000195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, R.S. (2014). Between-learners’ outside-of-classroom uses of American sign language as a foreign language. Sign Language Studies, 14(3), 360–381. doi:10.1353/sls.2014.0011.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D.D. (2004). Introduction to special education: Teaching in an age of opportunity. Boston, MA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, W.C. (1976). The study and use of sign language. Sign Language Studies, 10(1), 1–36. doi:10.1353/sls.1976.0005
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum-Baruchi, C., & Feder-Bubis, P. (2018). New sign language new(S): The globalization of sign language in the smartphone era. Disability & Society, 33(2), 309–312. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1383034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub, S.F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511509629.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of. Medical Education, 2, 53. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verkler, K.W. (1994). Middle school philosophy and second language acquisition theory: Working together for enhanced proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 27(1), 19–36. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1994.tb02306.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, L.W. (2006). Case studies of the literacy interactions of preschool deaf children with their parents in the home (Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/msit_diss/9
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, J.L. (2011). Examining the relationship between learning styles, instructor type, and academic performance in American Sign Language. (Order No. 10243836) (Doctoral dissertation). University of Phoenix. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7
   Google Scholar