Rethinking the essay: student perceptions of collaborative digital multimodal composition in the college classroom

References

• Alliance for Networking Visual Culture. (2020). About scalar. https://scalar.me/anvc/scalar/
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K.P., Powell, B., & Green, S.C. (2012). Understanding modal affordances: Student perceptions of potentials and limitations in multimodal composition. Basic Writing E-Journal, 1–21. https://bwe.ccny.cuny.edu/AlexanderPowellGreenUnderstandingModalAffordances.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K.A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, L., & Williams, R. (2021). Must history students write history essays? Journal of American History, 107(4), 926–941. doi:10.1093/jahist/jaaa464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). Implementing collaborative writing in teacher-centered classroom contexts: Student beliefs and perceptions. Language Awareness, 28(4), 247–267. doi:10.1080/09658416.2019.1675680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, H. (2019). Digital writing tools from the student perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1563–1581. doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9844-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePalma, M.-J., & Alexander, K.P. (2015). A bag full of snakes: Negotiating the challenges of multimodal composition. Computers and Composition, 37, 182–200. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Deveci, T. (2018). Student perceptions of collaborative writing in a project-based course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 721–732. doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.060415
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, D. (2017). Imagining the essay as digital assemblage: Collaborative student experiments with writing in Scalar. Prompt, 1(1), 35–46. doi:10.31719/pjaw.v1i1.13
   Google Scholar
• Folk, A.L. (2018). Drawing on students’ funds of knowledge. Journal of Information Literacy, 12(2), 44–59. doi:10.11645/12.2.2468
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (2017). Beyond the essay? Assessment and English literature. In B. Knights (Ed.), Teaching literature: Text and dialogue in the English classroom (pp. 99–114). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-31110-8_7
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, C. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685. doi:10.1002/tesq.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, C. (2015). Remix culture and English language teaching: The expression of learner voice in digital multimodal compositions. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 486–509. doi:10.1002/tesq.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K.D. (2013). Play, collaborate, break, build, share: ‘Screwing around’ in digital pedagogy. Polymath: An Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Journal, 3(3). https://ojcs.siue.edu/ojs/index.php/polymath/article/view/2853
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, T. (2013). Crafting digital writing: Composing texts across media and genres. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, E., Reinking, D., & Kaminski, R. (2015). Writing as creative design: Constructing multimodal arguments in a multiliteracies framework. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 16(1), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Isuster, M.Y. (2020). From students to authors: Fostering student content creation with Scalar. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 27(2–4), 133–148. doi:10.1080/10691316.2020.1830908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., & Luk, J. (2016). Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System, 59, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Yu, S., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Incorporating digital multimodal composing through collaborative action research: Challenges and coping strategies. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 31(1), 45–61. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2021.1978534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, L.F. (2000). New technologies, new literacies: Focus discipline research and ESL learning communities. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 96–116. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2331
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Belcher, D. (2020). Multimodal composing and traditional essays: Linguistic performance and learner perceptions. RELC Journal, 51(1), 86–100. doi:10.1177/0033688220906943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Kang, S., Nam, Y., & Skalicky, S. (2022). Peer interaction, writing proficiency, and the quality of collaborative digital multimodal composing task: Comparing guided and unguided planning. System, 106, 106. doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, C. (2009). Contending with terms: ‘Multimodal’ and ‘multimedia’ in the academic and public spheres. Computers and Composition, 26(4), 225–239. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Mohan, B.A., & Early, M. (1998). Issues of cooperative learning in ESL classes: A literature review. TESL Canada Journal, 15(2), 13–23. doi:10.18806/tesl.v15i2.698
   Google Scholar
• Lynam, S., & Cachia, M. (2018). Students’ perceptions of the role of assessments at higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 223–234. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1329928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion, P., Siegel, M., Li, Z., Pham, Q.N., & Alshaikhi, A. (2019). Technology-enhanced L2 writing: A systematic literature review and analysis/synthesis. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 4(1), 127–150. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208870/
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K.A., & Unsworth, L. (2018). The multimodal construction of race: A review of Critical Race Theory research. Language and Education, 32(4), 313–332. doi:10.1080/09500782.2018.1434787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Writing Project with Dànielle Nicole DeVoss, Elyse Eidman-Aadahl, and Troy Hicks. (2010). Because digital writing matters: Improving student writing in online and multimedia environments. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group, T., & New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 60–92. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1992). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, T.A. (2007). Planning your qualitative research project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ohito, E. (2020). ‘The creative aspect woke me up’: Awakening to multimodal essay composition as a fugitive literary practice. English Education, 52(3), 186–222.
   Google Scholar
• Riva, M. (2017). An emerging scholarly form: The digital monograph. DigitCult, Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures, 2(3), 63–74. https://digitcult.lim.di.unimi.it/index.php/dc/article/view/53
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning: How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145–158. doi:10.1177/1469787402003002004
   Google Scholar
• Saklofske, J., Clements, E., & Cunningham, R. (2012). They have come, why won’t we build it? On the digital future of the humanities. In B.D. Hirsch (Ed.), Digital humanities pedagogy: Practices, principles and politics (pp. 311–330). Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sample, M., & Schrum, K. (2013). What’s wrong with writing essays: A conversation. In D.J. Cohen & T. Scheinfeldt (Eds.), Hacking the academy: New approaches to scholarship and teaching from digital humanities (pp. 87–97). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286–305. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skains, R.L. (2017). The adaptive process of multimodal composition: How developing tacit knowledge of digital tools affects creative writing. Computers and Composition, 43, 106–117. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2015). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Stowe, S. (2012). Student perceptions and use of multimodal and traditional forms of composition. All Theses. Clemson University. 1396. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1396
   Google Scholar
• Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325–341. doi:10.1080/02602930500099102
   Google Scholar
• Sun, P., & Yuan, E. (2017). Understanding collaborative language learning in novice-level foreign language classrooms: Perceptions of teachers and students. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 189–205. doi:10.1080/10494820.2017.1285790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayoshi, P., & Selfe, C.L. (2007). Thinking about multimodality. In C. Selfe Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers, pp. 1–12. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. http://techstyle.lmc.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Takayoshi-Selfe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, D.G. (2016). Assessing digital humanities tools: Use of Scalar at a research university. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(1), 163–189. doi:10.1353/pla.2016.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, D., & Hoiem, E.F.M. (2017). Teaching digital humanities tools at a distance: A librarian-instructor partnership integrating Scalar into a graduate distance course. At the Helm: Leading Transformation: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2017 Conference March 22-25. Baltimore, MD, 704–713.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, Y., & Shonfeld, M. (2018). Students’ willingness to practice collaborative learning. Teaching Education, 31(2), 127–143. doi:10.1080/10476210.2018.1508280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, D. (2013). What is open pedagogy? Improving Learning. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2975
   Google Scholar
• Womack, P. (1993). What are essays for? English in Education, 27(2), 42–48. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.1993.tb01101.x
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.F.D. (2012). Multimodal composing in digital storytelling. Computers and Composition, 29(3), 221–238. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2012.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146–165. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar