Case study of designing and evaluating an independent open learner model tool

References

• Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–24. doi:10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bodily, R., Kay, J., Aleven, V., Jivet, I., Davis, D., Xhakaj, F., & Verbert, K. (2018). Open learner models and learning analytics dashboards: A systematic review. In 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 41–50). ACM. doi:10.1145/3170358.3170409
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D., & Shepherd, C. (2010). Student perceptions of ePortfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295–314. doi:10.1080/01587919.2010.513955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, S., Gakhal, I., Grundy, D., Johnson, M., Mabbott, A., & Xu, J. (2010). Preferences in multiple-view open learner models. In M. Wolpers, P. Kirschner, M. Scheffel, S. Lindstaedt, & V. Dimitrova Eds., (pp. 476–481). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_40
   Google Scholar
• Bull, S., & Gardner, P. (2009). Highlighting learning across a degree with an independent open learner model. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems That Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling (AIED), 200, 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, S., Johnson, M., Alotaibi, M., Byrne, W., & Cierniak, G. (2013). Visualising multiple data sources in an independent open learner model. In H. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow, & P. Pavlik (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 199–208). Memphis, United St: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_21
   Google Scholar
• Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2013). Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 349–365). New York: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_23
   Google Scholar
• Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2016). SMILI☺: A framework for interfaces to learning data in open learner models, learning analytics and related fields. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 293–331. doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0090-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, S., Wasson, B., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Johnson, M., Moe, E., Hansen, C., & MeisslEgghart, G. (2012). Assessing English as a second language: From classroom data to a competence-based open learner model. In Proc. International Conference on Computers in Education, 26-30 November 2012, Singapore (pp. 618–622).
   Google Scholar
• Cain, A. (2013). Constructive alignment for Introductory Programming [ Thesis]. Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chynał, P., Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A., & Piet, M. (2017). Personalisation of learning process in intelligent tutoring systems using behavioural measures. In Multimedia and network information systems (pp. 407–417). Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43982-2_35
   Google Scholar
• Conati, C., Porayska-Pomsta, K., & Mavrikis, M. (2018). AI in education needs interpretable machine learning: Lessons from open learner modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:180700154.
   Google Scholar
• Conejo, R., Trella, M., Cruces, I., & Garcia, R. (2011). INGRID: A web service tool for hierarchical open learner model visualization. Adjunct Proc (UMAP) Poster and Demo Track, Advances in User Modeling. 11-15 July 2011 Girona, Spain (pp. 406–409).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2014). Exploring the use of a deep approach to learning with students in the process of learning to teach in D. In V.D. Gijbels, Richardson, J.T.E., and Vermunt, J. Eds., Learning patterns in higher education. Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 187–213). London and New York: Routledge. EARLI Book Series
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., with Rutherford, S., Vieira, F., Erasmus+ team. (2021). A self-regulatory approach to assessment. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Somyurek, S., & Brusilovsky, P. (2016). An intelligent interface for learning content: Combining an open learner model and social comparison to support self-regulated learning and engagement. 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 7–10 March 2016, Sonoma, California (pp. 152–163).
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B., Yu, S., & Pintrich, P. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: from teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57–85). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, I., Bakalov, F., Brusilovsky, P., & König-Ries, B. (2011). Open social student modeling: Visualizing student models with parallel introspectiveviews. International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (pp. 171–182). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_15
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Kummerfeld, B., & Lauder, P. (2002). Personis: A server for user models. In P.D. Bra, P. Brusilovsky, & R. Conejo (Eds.), LNCS 2347 Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web Based Systems, Second Int. Conference (pp. 203–212). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., & Heffernan, N. (2015). Developing self-regulated learners through an intelligent tutoring system. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22-26 June 2015, Madrid, Spain (pp. 840–843).
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi, H., Demartini, G., Sadiq, S., & Gasevic, D. (2021). Charting the design and analytics agenda of learnersourcing systems. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 12-16 April 2021, Irvine, CA, USA (pp. 32–42).
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Mal, J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 28–41. doi:10.14742/ajet.3749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Cui, W., Wu, Y., & Liu, M. (2014). A survey on information visualization: Recent advances and challenges. The Visual Computer, 30(12), 1373–1393. doi:10.1007/s00371-013-0892-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Y., & Aleven, V. (2017). Enhancing learning outcomes through self-regulated learning support with an open learner model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(1), 55–88. doi:10.1007/s11257-016-9186-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Crespo, G., Blanco-Gandía, M., Valdivia-Salas, S., Fidalgo, C., & Sánchez-Pérez, N. (2022). The educational e-portfolio: Preliminary evidence of its relationship with student’s self-efficacy and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5233–5248. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10827-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabbott, A., & Bull, S. (2004). Alternative views on knowledge: Presentation of open learner models. In J. Lester, R. Vicari, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 7th International Conference ITS (pp. 689–698). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mahasneh, O. (2020). A proposed model for the university students’ e-portfolio. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7, 28–33. doi:10.20448/journal.509.2020.71.28.33
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. (2021). Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID-19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 199–203. doi:10.1002/hbe2.218
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2018). Tools to support self-regulated learning in online environments: Literature review. In V. Pammer-Schindler, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, H. Drachsler, R. Elferink, & M. Scheffel (Eds.), Lifelong technology-enhanced learning (pp. 16–30). Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. (1983). Progress self-monitoring: Effects on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 51(2), 89–93. doi:10.1080/00220973.1982.11011845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 83–110). New York: Springer Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_4
   Google Scholar
• Self, J. (1990). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier (Eds.), IntelligenT tutoring systems: At the crossroads of artificial intelligence and education (pp. 107–123). Norwood, N.J: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Shroff, R., Trent, J., & Ng, E. (2013). Using e-portfolios in a field experience placement: Examining student-teachers’ attitudes towards learning in relationship to personal value, control and responsibility. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29. doi:10.14742/ajet.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siadaty, M., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., Pata, K., Milikić, N., Holocher-Ertl, T., Jeremić, Z., Ali, L., Giljanović, A., & Hatala, M. (2012). Self-regulated workplace learning: A pedagogical framework and semantic web-based environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15, 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slepcevic-Zach, P., & Stock, M. (2018). ePortfolio as a tool for reflection and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 19(3), 291–307. doi:10.1080/14623943.2018.1437399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirouard, M., Bernaert, O., Dhorne, L., Bianchi, S., Pidol, L., & Petit, Y. (2015). Learning by doing: Integrating a serious game in a MOOC to promote new skills. European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit 2015, 18-20 May 2015, Belgium (pp. 92–96).
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J.D., & Donche, V. (2017). A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: State of the art and moving forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 269–299. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J.D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9(3), 257–280. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Rivera, J.D. (2021). Open student modeling research and its connections to educational assessment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(3), 380–396. doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00206-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Rivera, J.D., & Greer, J. (2004). Inspectable Bayesian student modelling servers in multi-agent tutoring systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(4), 535–563. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. Davidson & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 233–262). UK: Cabidge niversity Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615771.009
   Google Scholar